SalarySwishSalarySwish

Probably dumb idea

Created by: MNCountryClub
Team: 2021-22 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 3, 2022
Published: Mar. 4, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Likely a dumb thought, but I’d like the wild to get bigger and tougher on the blueline.
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Goligoski, Alex ($2,500,000 retained)
2.
PHI
  1. Benn, Jordie
  2. 2023 6th round pick (MIN)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2024
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$76,886,921$0$815,000$4,613,079
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,100,000$5,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$825,833$825,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,666,667$3,666,667
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,575,000$7,575,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,125,000$1,125,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000 ($875,000$875K$875,000$875K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Mar. 4, 2022 at 1:55 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 449
Nakita is worse than Alex with worse contract. Literally Nikita makes Minnesota worse
Mar. 4, 2022 at 2:17 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: GophersBenJ
Nakita is worse than Alex with worse contract. Literally Nikita makes Minnesota worse


Care to explain? Zadorov beats Goligoski in a lot of defensive advanced stats (xGF%, HDCF%, HDCA, HDGA). His contract is also better, though that is negated with the retention here (which I am fine with).

I think that trade is pretty good for us and considering Calgary has cap issues this season I think it actually works out pretty well for both teams.
MNCountryClub and Morzski liked this.
Mar. 4, 2022 at 2:23 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,920
Quoting: TanSor
Care to explain? Zadorov beats Goligoski in a lot of defensive advanced stats (xGF%, HDCF%, HDCA, HDGA). His contract is also better, though that is negated with the retention here (which I am fine with).

I think that trade is pretty good for us and considering Calgary has cap issues this season I think it actually works out pretty well for both teams.


That’s precisely what my thought process and rationale was. At the very least, I think it’s a somewhat interesting framework.
TanSor liked this.
Mar. 4, 2022 at 2:25 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: drmantalban
That’s precisely what my thought process and rationale was. At the very least, I think it’s a somewhat interesting framework.


I really like it. Zadorov is basically being wasted on their 3rd pairing. This gives the Flames a more affordable, but still good, defenseman for cap flexibility and the Wild get an objective upgrade with added toughness to the blue line that we need. I'd even be fine throwing in a sweetener if we had to
MNCountryClub liked this.
Mar. 4, 2022 at 2:38 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,920
Quoting: TanSor
I really like it. Zadorov is basically being wasted on their 3rd pairing. This gives the Flames a more affordable, but still good, defenseman for cap flexibility and the Wild get an objective upgrade with added toughness to the blue line that we need. I'd even be fine throwing in a sweetener if we had to


Yeah I’d be curious to see what Flames fans think. IMO, they seem big enough and deep enough where they can afford to move Zadorov if it means bringing in a better offensive d man and gaining a bit of cap.
TanSor liked this.
See All