SalarySwishSalarySwish

retool

Created by: noted
Team: 2024-25 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 12, 2024
Published: Mar. 12, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,000,000
2$1,000,000
2$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$6,000,000
Trades
1.
2.
STL
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (FLA)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYI
2025
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2026
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,700,000$82,723,095$0$412,500$4,976,905
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$835,833$835,833
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$950,000$950,000
RW, C
RFA
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,800,000$5,800,000
LW, RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
UFA
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,571,429$3,571,429
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$852,500$852,500
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
RFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$950,000$950,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$800,000$800K)
C
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Mar. 12 at 4:55 p.m.
#1
Good Opinion Haver
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 939
Signing Chandler Stephenson for his age 30-35 seasons at 6 million per when he's been one of the worst defensive players all year and is not scoring nearly as much as he used to to justify it- gonna be a big yikes from be dawg.

This is where the "staying competitive" and the "building for the future" thing that the Blues are trying to do seems really incongruent. That's a contract you sign when you're in win-now mode, you just need a passable center to get you over the hump. But they can't afford to have 33 year old Chandler Stephenson taking up cap space for when Dalibor Dvorsky and Jimmy Snuggerud need his money and roster spot (especially if we're already still going to have Brayden Schenn taking up that money and a roster spot lower in the lineup).
jfkst1 liked this.
Mar. 12 at 5:38 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 933
Edited Mar. 12 at 6:12 p.m.
Quoting: TheEarthmaster
Signing Chandler Stephenson for his age 30-35 seasons at 6 million per when he's been one of the worst defensive players all year and is not scoring nearly as much as he used to to justify it- gonna be a big yikes from be dawg.

This is where the "staying competitive" and the "building for the future" thing that the Blues are trying to do seems really incongruent. That's a contract you sign when you're in win-now mode, you just need a passable center to get you over the hump. But they can't afford to have 33 year old Chandler Stephenson taking up cap space for when Dalibor Dvorsky and Jimmy Snuggerud need his money and roster spot (especially if we're already still going to have Brayden Schenn taking up that money and a roster spot lower in the lineup).


I could agree with this. I almost want to do complete rebuild and trade everyone but Thomas and 1st / 2nd year players but don’t think Blues will ever do that.
TheEarthmaster liked this.
Mar. 12 at 6:14 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 933
Quoting: TheEarthmaster
Signing Chandler Stephenson for his age 30-35 seasons at 6 million per when he's been one of the worst defensive players all year and is not scoring nearly as much as he used to to justify it- gonna be a big yikes from be dawg.

This is where the "staying competitive" and the "building for the future" thing that the Blues are trying to do seems really incongruent. That's a contract you sign when you're in win-now mode, you just need a passable center to get you over the hump. But they can't afford to have 33 year old Chandler Stephenson taking up cap space for when Dalibor Dvorsky and Jimmy Snuggerud need his money and roster spot (especially if we're already still going to have Brayden Schenn taking up that money and a roster spot lower in the lineup).


The Blues will have $11M to do something with. Wouldn't be the worst thing if they didn't spend to cap next season...
Mar. 12 at 6:27 p.m.
#4
Good Opinion Haver
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 939
Quoting: noted
The Blues will have $11M to do something with. Wouldn't be the worst thing if they didn't spend to cap next season...


So that's the thing- people are always like "oh well the Blues can't possibly afford to go through a rebuild financially" and I'm sure on some sense there may be truth to that given that the playoffs is where smaller market teams make most of their money. Even two home games can have a big impact on the bottom line.

But an easy way to make missing the playoffs multiple years in a row (as seems likely to be happening this year) much more affordable is not spending to the cap every year. Bank that 11 million for the future. For awhile this team NEVER spent to the cap, and so the Stillman group has made a big show of being guys that spend to the cap every year. And that's fantastic when the team needs to make big moves. But there are plenty of times when spending to the cap doesn't make sense, and I think unless they're getting payed in the form of picks or prospects to take on onerous deals from other teams right now is probably one of those times.

I liked their low-risk bets on Vrana and Kapanen, Hayes less so because of his term but like he's been fine. But it's hard to square "they have no money for a rebuild" with them spending 9 million on those three guys this year for basically no noticeable improvement in the standings compared to last year.
noted liked this.
See All