LongtimeLeafsufferer
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,501
Likes: 23,236
Doubt if Rask would ever waive his NMC to go to an out of the playoffs Western Conference. I like your idea of moving a big contract to help in other areas. Also wonder if many teams would be interested in sending the Bruins any assets back for a 29 year goalie on a long term 7 m a year deal. You might call me insane, but the most realistic deal to get rid of long term contracts is to put the player on waivers. No assets coming back, but no bad contracts either. Is this a way to get around NMCs? Gives a team to spend in Boston's case, 7m a year to spend elsewhere.