SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realistic

Created by: Hype1298
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 6, 2018
Published: Jul. 6, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$950,000
2$950,000
7$7,000,000
7$6,500,000
8$10,000,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
3$2,000,000
3$2,000,000
1$700,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,500,000
2$950,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
Trades
TOR
  1. Faulk, Justin ($1,200,000 retained)
CAR
  1. Bracco, Jeremy
  2. Kapanen, Kasperi
  3. Sparks, Garret
  4. 2020 2nd round pick (TOR)
  5. 2021 3rd round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
If Toronto wins cup in 2020, 2nd round pick becomes a first
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$79,500,000$75,038,333$0$0$4,461,667

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 6
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 5
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW
UFA - 5
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
$700,000$700,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
$2,950,000$2,950,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LD
UFA - 4
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 2
$950,000$950,000
RD
UFA - 1
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Special Teams

Penalty Kill 1
 
 
 

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 6, 2018 at 1:18 a.m.
#1
Toronno Maple Leafs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 688
Likes: 174
Quite a bit for Faulk.
Jul. 6, 2018 at 1:34 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 951
Yeah i would take it,

would rather have Connor Brown but that's enough
Jul. 6, 2018 at 2:00 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 5,120
Likes: 1,850
Sabres fan here

You’re giving up way too much for Faulk
But as an anti-Leafs guy, i hope u guys do this trade
Faulk isn’t the answer to fixing your defense, as he’s been pretty bad in his own zone
Unless u really think u need him for your PP (i don’t think you do), then giving up assets s for him is a bad move imo

PS.
Screw u guys for getting Tavares
Ugh
Jul. 6, 2018 at 9:50 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Hype1298
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
He’s not the ideal player we need I’d agree with that, but having a puck moving defender with potential for 50points on the right side would make our breakout way less predictable, power play is alright but losing 2/3 of our #2 power play could hurt us.....I mean defending isnt important anyways
Jul. 6, 2018 at 9:51 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Hype1298
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Quoting: Jdfitz77
Sabres fan here

You’re giving up way too much for Faulk
But as an anti-Leafs guy, i hope u guys do this trade
Faulk isn’t the answer to fixing your defense, as he’s been pretty bad in his own zone
Unless u really think u need him for your PP (i don’t think you do), then giving up assets s for him is a bad move imo

PS.
Screw u guys for getting Tavares
Ugh


He’s not the ideal player we need I’d agree with that, but having a puck moving defender with potential for 50points on the right side would make our breakout way less predictable, power play is alright but losing 2/3 of our #2 power play could hurt us.....I mean defending isnt important anyways
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll