Play McDavid, bench Crosby, cut Ovi
Play Barkov, bench Tarasenko, cut Tavares
Play Larkin, bench point, cut Marner
Play Trouba, bench Reilly, cut Dumba
Play Hedman, bench Doughty, cut Burns
Play Fleury, bench Rask, cut Lundqvist
Play Mcdavid, bench Ovi , cut Crosby
Play Tavares, Bench Barkov, cut Tarasenko
Play Dumba, Bench Trouba ,Cut Reilly
Play Hedman, Bench Burns , Cut Doughty
Play Fleury, Bench Rask , Cut Lundqvist
Play Marner, Bench Larkin , Cut Point
I think you're doing this wrong based on the description provided, but not sure.
Even then --- you're choosing Larkin over Marner and Point? Woof.
Marner: 21 years old + 0.82 pts/gm, 0.26 goals/gm
Point: 22 years old + 0.71 pts/gm, 0.33 goals/gm
Larkin: 22 years old + 0.58 pts/gm, 0.23 goals/gm
The only real advantage of Larkin is that he's likely to be on the cheapest contract of those three players. He gets more defensive zone starts too, so that's a consideration. But Marner and Point haven't been asked to play a defensive role because of how potent they are offensively. Give me the guys who put up 41% (Marner) and 22% (Point) more points, respectively, versus Larkin.
I think you're doing this wrong based on the description provided, but not sure.
Even then --- you're choosing Larkin over Marner and Point? Woof.
Marner: 21 years old + 0.82 pts/gm, 0.26 goals/gm
Point: 22 years old + 0.71 pts/gm, 0.33 goals/gm
Larkin: 22 years old + 0.58 pts/gm, 0.23 goals/gm
The only real advantage of Larkin is that he's likely to be on the cheapest contract of those three players. He gets more defensive zone starts too, so that's a consideration. But Marner and Point haven't been asked to play a defensive role because of how potent they are offensively. Give me the guys who put up 41% (Marner) and 22% (Point) more points, respectively, versus Larkin.
nope I got it.. and I was choosing Larkin. guess Im just not a Leafs fan haha.