SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NYR trade

Created by: NerveFWC
Team: 2019-20 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 30, 2019
Published: Jul. 30, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
3$7,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,500,000
Trades
CGY
  1. Kreider, Chris
  2. 2020 4th round pick (NYR)
NYR
  1. Brodie, TJ
  2. Jankowski, Mark
  3. 2020 3rd round pick (CGY)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$72,270,475$0$747,500$9,229,525

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,625,000$4,625,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,500,000$7,500,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,300,000$4,300,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$755,833$755,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,375,000$1,375,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,857,143$3,857,143
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 2
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$730,833$730,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 30, 2019 at 2:31 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 672
NY has zero need for another RHD.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 2:32 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 29
Likes: 2
NYR either getting a first or a top offensive prospect
Jul. 30, 2019 at 2:40 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 618
Likes: 104
Quoting: aspina25
NY has zero need for another RHD.


Brodie is left handed
Jul. 30, 2019 at 2:41 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 55
Likes: 19
Quoting: aspina25
NY has zero need for another RHD.


Speculation that the Rangers may buy out Shattenkirk in order to create caproom. Brodie would help shore up the hole left by him and he can play on either side. Preferably the right, whenever I see him play he looks better on the right side anyways.
A trade with NYR most likely doesn't happen if Shatt isn't bought out though.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 2:43 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 55
Likes: 19
Quoting: Poorhank
NYR either getting a first or a top offensive prospect


Not for one year of Kreider, especially with a dman who can play top pairing coming the other way on a similar one year deal and both of similar age.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 2:49 p.m.
#6
ChytilMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 294
Quoting: NerveFWC
Speculation that the Rangers may buy out Shattenkirk in order to create caproom. Brodie would help shore up the hole left by him and he can play on either side. Preferably the right, whenever I see him play he looks better on the right side anyways.
A trade with NYR most likely doesn't happen if Shatt isn't bought out though.


Shattenkirk leaves no hole when he’s gone. Without him our D is
Skjei-Trouba
Hajek- DeAngelo
Staal- Fox
We don’t need him
Jul. 30, 2019 at 2:50 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 618
Likes: 104
Quoting: Poorhank
NYR either getting a first or a top offensive prospect


Brodie and Kreider are both rentals
Jul. 30, 2019 at 2:50 p.m.
#8
ChytilMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 294
The value is fine for Kreider but Rangers don’t even consider this. We have no need for Brodie. There’s no space for him either. An offer of Sam Bennett and a 1st would be acceptable.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 2:55 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 55
Likes: 19
Quoting: ChytilMania
Shattenkirk leaves no hole when he’s gone. Without him our D is
Skjei-Trouba
Hajek- DeAngelo
Staal- Fox
We don’t need him


Personally I think the Rangers could have a great year with the moves they made, I don't think they will risk going in with such a young defense corps. It's always good to have depth and experience especially at that position. If Shattenkirk is bought out or moved I can't see them running two rookies without any depth in case of injury. But I also have no idea about Hajek, and how he could do as a rookie. I think Fox will make it on the bottom pairing and will get opportunity for you guys with the 2nd pp unit.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 2:56 p.m.
#10
ChytilMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 294
Quoting: NerveFWC
Personally I think the Rangers could have a great year with the moves they made, I don't think they will risk going in with such a young defense corps. It's always good to have depth and experience especially at that position. If Shattenkirk is bought out or moved I can't see them running two rookies without any depth in case of injury. But I also have no idea about Hajek, and how he could do as a rookie. I think Fox will make it on the bottom pairing and will get opportunity for you guys with the 2nd pp unit.


You’re right but that’s why it’s unlikely that Shattenkirk is bought out or dealt. We buyout Smith and move one (or more) of Strome, Namestnikov, and Kreider.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 2:58 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 55
Likes: 19
Quoting: ChytilMania
You’re right but that’s why it’s unlikely that Shattenkirk is bought out or dealt. We buyout Smith and move one (or more) of Strome, Namestnikov, and Kreider.


Makes sense, I was just going off some rumblings of a possible Shattenkirk buyout hahah. If he stays then Rangers do not have a need on D for sure. But you have piqued my interest on Hajek. I'll have to take a look at him. Haven't heard that name before.
ChytilMania liked this.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 3:05 p.m.
#12
ChytilMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 294
Quoting: NerveFWC
Makes sense, I was just going off some rumblings of a possible Shattenkirk buyout hahah. If he stays then Rangers do not have a need on D for sure. But you have piqued my interest on Hajek. I'll have to take a look at him. Haven't heard that name before.


I have Hajek higher than many. I see him as a future top 4 guy. He was phenomenal in his few games in the big leagues, although he was not very good in the AHL.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 3:17 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 868
Likes: 130
Quoting: claytron8000
Brodie and Kreider are both rentals


Whats your point??
Both players would fetch 1st round picks at the deadline also.
Hangup today, is cap space, and it being used against those who are tight.
Both players are a 1st plus prospect... if not now then in March.
Jul. 30, 2019 at 3:59 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 55
Likes: 19
Quoting: xxToothxx
Whats your point??
Both players would fetch 1st round picks at the deadline also.
Hangup today, is cap space, and it being used against those who are tight.
Both players are a 1st plus prospect... if not now then in March.


I think the point was that if they're being traded for eachother they are of similar value.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll