SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bye bye rask

Created by: Drew
Team: 2016-17 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 7, 2016
Published: Jul. 7, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I'll be waiting for my phone call Don. Lol
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
2$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
Vesey, Jimmy
2$900,000
Trades
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2017
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the FLA
2018
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2019
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$73,000,000$61,393,334$0$415,000$11,606,666
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
$625,000$625,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Vesey, Jimmy
$900,000$900,000
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
$925,000$925,000
RW
UFA - 1
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 5
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$950,000$950,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$2,300,000$2,300,000
RW
UFA - 2
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
$600,000$600,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$6,916,667$6,916,667
LD
NMC
UFA - 2
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$2,300,000$2,300,000
G
UFA - 3
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
UFA - 4
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 3
$1,200,000$1,200,000
G
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
LD
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 7, 2016 at 11:05 p.m.
#1
I'm Savage okay?
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 30
Likes: 2
I think all ur free agency signings are highly possible. This is nice to see smile

My only constructive criticism is the Rask trade, and here's my problem with it:
The Ducks just traded Andersen to the leafs with the intent of looking long term with Gibson. For a team that is employing a longer term ideology why would they acquire a goalie who is already 29 (turning 30 soon) and seen by many as 'past his prime.' Thus, i feel in this situation u are undervaluing Gibson who in his first season showed high potential and will be most likely considered 'elite' in a few years.

Thanks for sharing, & all the best!
Jul. 8, 2016 at 12:08 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: hockeyfan98
I think all ur free agency signings are highly possible. This is nice to see smile

My only constructive criticism is the Rask trade, and here's my problem with it:
The Ducks just traded Andersen to the leafs with the intent of looking long term with Gibson. For a team that is employing a longer term ideology why would they acquire a goalie who is already 29 (turning 30 soon) and seen by many as 'past his prime.' Thus, i feel in this situation u are undervaluing Gibson who in his first season showed high potential and will be most likely considered 'elite' in a few years.

Thanks for sharing, & all the best!


I think it makes sense actually. Getzlaf and perry aren't getting any younger and need an elite goalie to help propel them to the cup. Gibson , while good, is not elite as of yet. Boston on the other hand is trying to retool with a younger core, I like this move for both teams
Jul. 8, 2016 at 12:51 a.m.
#3
I am death
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 422
Likes: 10
Quoting: mhockey91
Quoting: hockeyfan98
I think all ur free agency signings are highly possible. This is nice to see smile

My only constructive criticism is the Rask trade, and here's my problem with it:
The Ducks just traded Andersen to the leafs with the intent of looking long term with Gibson. For a team that is employing a longer term ideology why would they acquire a goalie who is already 29 (turning 30 soon) and seen by many as 'past his prime.' Thus, i feel in this situation u are undervaluing Gibson who in his first season showed high potential and will be most likely considered 'elite' in a few years.

Thanks for sharing, & all the best!


I think it makes sense actually. Getzlaf and perry aren't getting any younger and need an elite goalie to help propel them to the cup. Gibson , while good, is not elite as of yet. Boston on the other hand is trying to retool with a younger core, I like this move for both teams


Anaheim has an internal budget and the sole reason they want to trade Fowler is to save up money especially with Lindholm (Sens or Oilers please offersheet the F out of him), and Ricardo Rakell in need of new contracts.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll