SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Another Non-Fans Bruins Trades

Created by: Silkysmooth42
Team: 2020-21 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 3, 2020
Published: Jul. 3, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This is just over the past 4 days or so

Again, I UNDERSTAND that these trades happen independently of one another, and that some wouldnt happen if others did, but the point here is that: People have gotten REALLY bad at thinking about the other teams POV

Like: why would the bruins give up a 1st and their best defensive prospect (urho) to basically take on a slightly better C with a larger cap for many more years. Would clearly rather just keep krejci and resign him to smaller deals over the next 3 years lol
Or: Why would the bruins give up their entire young prospect pool (urho, Freddy, JFK, Bjork, and a 1st) for a super expensive washed up Dman, and then play him at RW where he has only played like 5 times in his career.
Lastly: Why would a CUP CONTENDER give up a top 6 winger for two late 2nd rounders. Like, hes worth more first off, but also thats just shooting themselves in the foot

Yall: Please consider the other teams' perspectives on these trades

EDIT: Forgot to mention: Krug is not getting more than 7.25 mil... but so many people wanna keep saying "ahhh bruins give him 8+" so thats why i did that lol
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,250,000
6$8,250,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Carlo, Brandon
  2. Kase, Ondrej
  3. Ritchie, Nick
  4. 2021 1st round pick (BOS)
  5. 2021 4th round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Debrusk was part of another trade so Replaced him with an underestimate of his value
2.
BOS
  1. Burns, Brent ($2,500,000 retained)
SJS
  1. Bjork, Anders [RFA Rights]
  2. Forsbacka Karlsson, Jakob [Reserve List]
  3. Frederic, Trent
  4. Vaakanainen, Urho
  5. 2022 1st round pick (BOS)
3.
TBL
  1. 2020 3rd round pick (BOS)
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Ritchie was part of another deal so replaced him with a lower value piece
4.
BOS
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (NYI)
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
Note that its the later picks lolol
OTT
  1. DeBrusk, Jake [RFA Rights]
5.
BOS
  1. Toews, Jonathan ($1,500,000 retained)
CHI
  1. Krejci, David
  2. Studnicka, Jack
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (BOS)
  4. 2020 2nd round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
THE OG trade was Krejci, Vaak, and a 1st

But i had no Vaak and no 1st, so i made it Stud and two 2nds
6.
BOS
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (ARI)
ARI
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
I mean cmon, we know hes worth more than a 3rd rn lol
7.
BOS
  1. 2020 6th round pick (ANA)
ANA
  1. Moore, John
  2. 2020 5th round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
This is the rough one.

I mean, there are still like a fewwwww people left who think he isnt a cap dump, which is good progress. But we still need to make sure people are informed!

A top 6 dman who is stuck behind 4 other top 6 dmen isnt a 7th dman
Just like a first line Center stuck behind another first line Center isnt a second line Center (Crosby x Malkin)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$84,988,889$964,222$1,250,000-$3,488,889
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,000,000$9,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,780,000$2,780,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$8,250,000$8,250,000
LD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,250,000$2,250,000 (Performance Bonus$1,250,000$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 3, 2020 at 10:17 a.m.
#1
MMBzFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 281
Now that’s a 2nd line!
Jul. 3, 2020 at 10:27 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
No way Sweeney is giving Krug over $8 million. Marner deal is nowhere near realistic. Krejci in a deal for Toews yeah the Hawks say no. You're still 3 players short and over the cap by some $5.234 million.
Jul. 3, 2020 at 10:42 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,592
Likes: 5,462
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
No way Sweeney is giving Krug over $8 million. Marner deal is nowhere near realistic. Krejci in a deal for Toews yeah the Hawks say no. You're still 3 players short and over the cap by some $5.234 million.


It's not like Marner and Toews are getting traded
Jul. 3, 2020 at 10:48 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 8,107
Likes: 4,278
That wouldn’t be fair at all!! Good luck beating this team..
Jul. 3, 2020 at 10:50 a.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: bhavikp27
It's not like Marner and Toews are getting traded


True, Not for those pieces anyways, Marner would easily cost McAvoy and then some. And Sweeney hangs up on Dubas.
Jul. 3, 2020 at 10:55 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,592
Likes: 5,462
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
True, Not for those pieces anyways, Marner would easily cost McAvoy and then some. And Sweeney hangs up on Dubas.


" and then some "
Jul. 3, 2020 at 12:13 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,800
Likes: 3,226
Too much retention on Burns to not even get one really good piece back
Jul. 3, 2020 at 12:18 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
No way Sweeney is giving Krug over $8 million. Marner deal is nowhere near realistic. Krejci in a deal for Toews yeah the Hawks say no. You're still 3 players short and over the cap by some $5.234 million.


Quoting: bhavikp27
It's not like Marner and Toews are getting traded


Lol i forgot to mention it in my description, check it now lol
Jul. 3, 2020 at 12:18 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
True, Not for those pieces anyways, Marner would easily cost McAvoy and then some. And Sweeney hangs up on Dubas.


Quoting: bhavikp27
" and then some "


Also hahahahaha
Marner costing Mcavoy and then some

try Mcavoy costs Marner, with retention, and then some. Or bruins reject easily lol
Jul. 3, 2020 at 12:19 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: papishark
Too much retention on Burns to not even get one really good piece back


They get 5 good pieces back lol
not enough retention
Bruins reject so fast
Jul. 3, 2020 at 1:25 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,800
Likes: 3,226
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
They get 5 good pieces back lol
not enough retention
Bruins reject so fast


Uh ok you want a Norris finalist for under 5 million a year and only by giving some bottom six prospects and a first back ok
Jul. 3, 2020 at 2:42 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: papishark
Uh ok you want a Norris finalist for under 5 million a year and only by giving some bottom six prospects and a first back ok


"some bottom six prospects" is the first problem

But more importantly, the value doesnt matter, bruins DONT WANT Burnsy

Urho: Solid Top 4 dman
Frederick: Great middle 6 forward prospect
Bjork: Top 6 potential Already middle 6
JFK: middle 6 to top 6
and a 1st
Jul. 3, 2020 at 3:26 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,800
Likes: 3,226
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
"some bottom six prospects" is the first problem

But more importantly, the value doesnt matter, bruins DONT WANT Burnsy

Urho: Solid Top 4 dman
Frederick: Great middle 6 forward prospect
Bjork: Top 6 potential Already middle 6
JFK: middle 6 to top 6
and a 1st


Those are some serious homer stretches, you seriously think all those guys have sky high potentials when the bruins system is usally ranked around 30th in the league? Very doubtful
dzmets liked this.
Jul. 4, 2020 at 10:39 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: papishark
Those are some serious homer stretches, you seriously think all those guys have sky high potentials when the bruins system is usally ranked around 30th in the league? Very doubtful


Lol nah those are spot on, i was gonna say im understaing them, but i know im not over or under stating them
Jul. 5, 2020 at 12:00 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,800
Likes: 3,226
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Lol nah those are spot on, i was gonna say im understaing them, but i know im not over or under stating them


You dont think you could be a little biased?
Jul. 5, 2020 at 12:38 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: papishark
You dont think you could be a little biased?


Of course, anyone can. But thats the point
Originally i thought Frederick was a top 6 C prospect, I have learned he is more of a grinder type and thus only a middle 6 (think of Shaw) type guy
Same with JFK, but he could still be if he wants to play in America (which is why i said middle 6)
Urho is top 4, thats just known\
And Bjork is currently a middle 6 forward who is coming from college and can develop into a top 6 guy still (now that he has playing time)

Anyone can be biased, but my comments here were without bias
Jul. 6, 2020 at 3:42 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Of course, anyone can. But thats the point
Originally i thought Frederick was a top 6 C prospect, I have learned he is more of a grinder type and thus only a middle 6 (think of Shaw) type guy
Same with JFK, but he could still be if he wants to play in America (which is why i said middle 6)
Urho is top 4, thats just known\
And Bjork is currently a middle 6 forward who is coming from college and can develop into a top 6 guy still (now that he has playing time)

Anyone can be biased, but my comments here were without bias


Anyone stating that a player 21 years old that will be 22 by the start of next season and has played a total of 7 games in his nhl career is definitely anything is offering a biased opinion. Urho may have top 4 potential but he has not yet proven he can even be an nhl regular
Jul. 6, 2020 at 3:55 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,618
Likes: 2,764
Quoting: dzmets
Anyone stating that a player 21 years old that will be 22 by the start of next season and has played a total of 7 games in his nhl career is definitely anything is offering a biased opinion. Urho may have top 4 potential but he has not yet proven he can even be an nhl regular


let me ask you a question... given what youve seen from the bruins. are you playing urho over chara? krug? grz? or are you keeping status quo and bringing him up when one of krug, grz or chara leaves? there is absolutely no reason any of zboril, vaak, even lauzon to a certain extent had to come up until someone left...
Silkysmooth42 liked this.
Jul. 6, 2020 at 6:57 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: dzmets
Anyone stating that a player 21 years old that will be 22 by the start of next season and has played a total of 7 games in his nhl career is definitely anything is offering a biased opinion. Urho may have top 4 potential but he has not yet proven he can even be an nhl regular


Sorry. Then i guess Kakko is a bottom 6 forward. Jack Hughes is a middle 6 guy for life. Jesse Puju is an AHLer. etc...
Jul. 6, 2020 at 7:19 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Sorry. Then i guess Kakko is a bottom 6 forward. Jack Hughes is a middle 6 guy for life. Jesse Puju is an AHLer. etc...


All of these guys have played more games in the nhl as teenagers then Urho has as a 21 year old. They very well could become first line players but none of them have proven that is what they will be.
Jul. 6, 2020 at 8:17 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: dzmets
All of these guys have played more games in the nhl as teenagers then Urho has as a 21 year old. They very well could become first line players but none of them have proven that is what they will be.


Ok sorry. i guess Kirill Kaprizov ISNT the best NHL affiliated Prospect (hes 23) and Zegras must suck.
Oh and when Panarin hadnt played an NHL game at 23 he also was a bust

You get my point. You are wrong. Urho is a top 4 dman prospect with solid potential still
Jul. 6, 2020 at 8:49 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Ok sorry. i guess Kirill Kaprizov ISNT the best NHL affiliated Prospect (hes 23) and Zegras must suck.
Oh and when Panarin hadnt played an NHL game at 23 he also was a bust

You get my point. You are wrong. Urho is a top 4 dman prospect with solid potential still


He's a top 4 d prospect but not in your words a solid top 4 dman that would be Carlo. I never said he was a bust but only a projection at this point.
Jul. 6, 2020 at 8:56 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: dzmets
He's a top 4 d prospect but not in your words a solid top 4 dman that would be Carlo. I never said he was a bust but only a projection at this point.


"Urho is top 4, thats just known". that was the projection, not his CURRENT status lol. We were talking about prospects and their projections, so that was the important context.

If thats what you are caught up on then that was just your misunderstanding and its no big deal dont worry lol

Clearly he isnt CURRENTLY a top 4 dman lol, but he is 1000% a top 4 prospect. And the point is that i was told i was maybe being biased because of that. So i was just saying people know he is a top 4 [prospect]
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll