Quoting: PGHBOB69
McCann is better than Nichushkin. McCann has had back to back 35 point seasons. And 19 goals in 18-19. You are looking at his stat line wrong!! You are looking at it and not adding the 2 lines together in 18-19. It’s not 2 separate seasons..lol. He split the year between 2 teams. And McCann is only 24 years old. Made the NHL when he was 19 years old and has never looked back. And he’s been bounced around from 3C, to top 6 LW, to 3rd line LW, to 2C when Sid or Geno miss time. And this year, he’ll score 20 plus goals. They already said, they are keeping him on the LW so he can do what he does best, and just snipe!! Score goals, he has a great shot!! And young players need that consistency and routine. Like I said, he’s been jumped around to anywhere we were weak and needed him. Usually only veteran players are good at that, being a utility type player. The young players need that consistency and routine or u could ruin them. This year, he is gonna easily score 20 plus goals; he already scored 19 in a season. And he’s a good two-way player. Ya sure, Nichushkin is better defensively, he had Selke votes last year!! But McCann is a lot better offensively right now!! And much more potential.
First, pretty sure
@bhavikp27 was quoting Haula's stats (not McCann's). I was confused as all hell until I realized this, but there ya go, lol.
Second, look a little deeper at Nichushkin's stats. He was able to drive possession and put up points despite heavy defensive deployment. McCann started in the offensive zone much more often than Nichushkin, which makes his one goal lead for the season a little less impressive.
In short, I think the statement that McC is better is highly questionable. It's not necessarily wrong, as both have a lot of years left and we'll have to see how it plays out, but it's definitely debatable.
Don't get me wrong here, I like McCann and think he's a nice player. He would be bottom six for the Avs though, and I'd rather have a guy who can do what Nuke does than one who would be best suited to more of an offensive deployment. That was my main point in this thread.