YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON HERE COMPARING HANIFIN TO PASTRNAK

I compared Lindholm to Pastrnak, obviously Pasta is better since he's a top 5 RW, but Lindholm is arguably a top 10 RW and definitely top 15. That difference is why I put in better players in the package

"Carlo can be ignored, because I also ignored Hanifin, thought that was obvious.
So it boils down to Studnicka + Kase + Vaak + 1st + 2nd for Lindholm. I agree Boston probably shouldnt do that. But I also don't think its a good trade for Calgary. Quality > Quantity

Tell me would you trade Pastrnak for Mangiapane + Pelletier + Valimaki + 1st + 2nd?
REPORT
"

OOOOOF Goodbye LMAOOOOO (You were the first one to bring him up lmao)
glad everyone can now clearly see I was right this whole time lmao

Wtf are you even talking about? You literally copy/pasted my exact words of "Carlo = Hanifin so take them out of the equation" yet still couldnt comprehend it. It must be hard walking around with blinders on, I feel bad for you.

I said "go back to Pasta vs Hanafin... Hanafin isnt even a top 10 LHD ... Pasta is a top 3 RW..."
You said "YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON HERE COMPARING HANIFIN TO PASTRNAK"
I then pointed out at you, IN FACT, did bring it up first.

You are literally wrong here, and the only one with blinders on. Again im enjoying every second of this cuz im so clearly right lmaooooo

How can I be wrong if you are creating your own narrative you clown?

"Carlo can be ignored, because I also ignored Hanifin" This means Carlo equals Hanifin, which also means Hanifin equals Carlo (crazy how math works)

"Studnicka + Kase + Vaak + 1st + 2nd for Lindholm" This is what the rest of the original trade equals That is why I asked "Pastrnak for Mangiapane + Pelletier + Valimaki + 1st + 2nd"

Now tell me would you trade Pastrnak for Mangiapane + Pelletier + Valimaki + the 2 picks? Because I would not trade Lindholm for Studnicka + Kase + Vaak + the 2 picks.

LMAO this is humor indeed

Please elaborate, what is so funny?