SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Draft picks Dach returns soon

Created by: Bsikora780
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 23, 2021
Published: Mar. 23, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. 2022 4th round pick (PIT)
2.
CHI
  1. 2022 5th round pick (NYI)
Additional Details:
Conditional
NYI
  1. Wallmark, Lucas
Additional Details:
To anyone
3.
CHI
  1. Hinostroza, Vinnie
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (FLA)
FLA
  1. Janmark, Mattias
Additional Details:
I think Janmark value is high for a depth foward but what is his real value. I think Florida might take this but i can see this getting rejected
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$47,471,314$1,090,244$5,132,500$34,028,686
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$880,833$880,833
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,200,000$3,200,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$866,667$866,667 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$825,833$825,833 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 23, 2021 at 4:23 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
I keep seeing this Söderberg trade but the guy is 35.
How is a team that wants to play with speed gonna play that way with 35 year old guys.
It's just a bad fit. It's as bad an idea as trading for PM was last year. Thank god JR is gone. It was well past time. There is no way Hextall does this same bad idea. If they go after an older player it will be Getz in ANA. But even that is doubtful. They really can't add old centers. They already got 2 guys 33+
Mar. 23, 2021 at 5:57 p.m.
#2
Phil Swift
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 594
Likes: 104
Quoting: pharrow
I keep seeing this Söderberg trade but the guy is 35.
How is a team that wants to play with speed gonna play that way with 35 year old guys.
It's just a bad fit. It's as bad an idea as trading for PM was last year. Thank god JR is gone. It was well past time. There is no way Hextall does this same bad idea. If they go after an older player it will be Getz in ANA. But even that is doubtful. They really can't add old centers. They already got 2 guys 33+


you do realize younger doesn't mean better right? Matt Cullen was in his late 30's for the penguins for both cup runs. and there's no way penguins are getting Getz unless ANA retains half and pens don't have the assets to make that happen
Bsikora780 liked this.
Mar. 23, 2021 at 8:36 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: Yinz3r
you do realize younger doesn't mean better right? Matt Cullen was in his late 30's for the penguins for both cup runs. and there's no way penguins are getting Getz unless ANA retains half and pens don't have the assets to make that happen


Matt Cullen is a rare example of a guy who could play that late, and he had a very limited role. Or do you not realize that. They didn't ask him to do a ton, just play defense for 5-6 minutes a night. The only time he ever got real ice time was when people got hurt. They tried to save his legs as much as possible and had a 4th line role.
I hate to break it to you but Söderberg is no Cullen, and the pens aren't looking for a guy to play 4C.
And while I agree the pens probably aren't getting Getz, that really isn't the point. They aren't trying to get older either. They need the younger players with legs. They are already to the point where they are keeping their top 2 centers in the Ozone as much as possible to save their legs. They need guys who are more adapt at playing a full 200 foot game. Not a cullen player who's role was to play in his end and eating up PK for 6-8 minutes a night.

It's a complete fallacy to think Söderberg is that guy. He's not. he's slow.
Mar. 23, 2021 at 9:49 p.m.
#4
Phil Swift
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 594
Likes: 104
Quoting: pharrow
Matt Cullen is a rare example of a guy who could play that late, and he had a very limited role. Or do you not realize that. They didn't ask him to do a ton, just play defense for 5-6 minutes a night. The only time he ever got real ice time was when people got hurt. They tried to save his legs as much as possible and had a 4th line role.
I hate to break it to you but Söderberg is no Cullen, and the pens aren't looking for a guy to play 4C.
And while I agree the pens probably aren't getting Getz, that really isn't the point. They aren't trying to get older either. They need the younger players with legs. They are already to the point where they are keeping their top 2 centers in the Ozone as much as possible to save their legs. They need guys who are more adapt at playing a full 200 foot game. Not a cullen player who's role was to play in his end and eating up PK for 6-8 minutes a night.

It's a complete fallacy to think Söderberg is that guy. He's not. he's slow.


he averaged over 13 minutes of ice time with pit. and guys like Bonino and others weren't the fastest but they had other things to offer. incase you hadn't noticed the past 3 cup winners didn't win with "speed" there's more to the game than that. if speed was the only thing that mattered then sam Lafferty is a goat
Mar. 23, 2021 at 11:02 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: Yinz3r
he averaged over 13 minutes of ice time with pit. and guys like Bonino and others weren't the fastest but they had other things to offer. incase you hadn't noticed the past 3 cup winners didn't win with "speed" there's more to the game than that. if speed was the only thing that mattered then sam Lafferty is a goat


did you read what you just typed.
Bonino played with speed. That's not even a debate.
That HBK line blew people off the ice. They were simply faster than everyone else. The whole line was built around speed.
TB won with Speed. I don't know how you get to they didn't. That is one fast team and it's their greatest weapon.

Speed is one of the biggest factors in winning games today. I don't know where you get it's not. Guys like Stutzle have changed teams with pure speed. They are just dangerous on the ice with it.
The whole game is faster today and if you can't skate you're done. Which is why you don't see the old players you use to see. They are weeded out as they can't keep up.

As for his averaged 13 minutes a night, that is very misleading. He got time due to injuries. It bumped him up into 3rd line minutes. They didn't want him playing that much ice time.
Malkin played 57-62 games.
Crosby was pretty healthy only missing like 7 games one year. But Bonino also only played 63 games one year. You add it up and you're playing a lot more minutes.

So Cullen got pressed into roles that put his ice time much higher than what they wanted it. When guys were healthy, he was playing under 10 minutes a night.
Their problem was they were always banged up. If it wasn't a center than it was a winger.
But that was never the intention with him.
Mar. 24, 2021 at 10:40 p.m.
#6
Phil Swift
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 594
Likes: 104
Quoting: pharrow
did you read what you just typed.
Bonino played with speed. That's not even a debate.
That HBK line blew people off the ice. They were simply faster than everyone else. The whole line was built around speed.
TB won with Speed. I don't know how you get to they didn't. That is one fast team and it's their greatest weapon.

Speed is one of the biggest factors in winning games today. I don't know where you get it's not. Guys like Stutzle have changed teams with pure speed. They are just dangerous on the ice with it.
The whole game is faster today and if you can't skate you're done. Which is why you don't see the old players you use to see. They are weeded out as they can't keep up.

As for his averaged 13 minutes a night, that is very misleading. He got time due to injuries. It bumped him up into 3rd line minutes. They didn't want him playing that much ice time.
Malkin played 57-62 games.
Crosby was pretty healthy only missing like 7 games one year. But Bonino also only played 63 games one year. You add it up and you're playing a lot more minutes.

So Cullen got pressed into roles that put his ice time much higher than what they wanted it. When guys were healthy, he was playing under 10 minutes a night.
Their problem was they were always banged up. If it wasn't a center than it was a winger.
But that was never the intention with him.


Did you read what you just read? the hkb line had speed? NO SH*T maybe because it had two of the leagues fastest skaters on the wings? Bonino is nowhere near a speedy player if you pay attention . he's a smart, savvy player which is why they worked so well. speed isn't the end all be all.
Mar. 25, 2021 at 1:10 a.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: Yinz3r
Did you read what you just read? the hkb line had speed? NO SH*T maybe because it had two of the leagues fastest skaters on the wings? Bonino is nowhere near a speedy player if you pay attention . he's a smart, savvy player which is why they worked so well. speed isn't the end all be all.


it wasn't all the other two players. Bonino's speed is what made him a great PKer who would score on the PK.
It's just not true that he wasn't a fast player.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll