SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Oilers 2021 Offseason Proving a Point to Haipho

Created by: younggreybeard
Team: 2021-22 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 30, 2021
Published: Jun. 30, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
What I hope the Oilers do this offseason. Mainly to prove a point to my friend.

Buyout Koski.
Resign Larsson to $4Mx4.
Sign Oleksiak to $2.5Mx2.
Resign Khaira to $1Mx2.
Sign Ullmark or trade for Kuemper.
Sign Saad to $5Mx3.
Sign Yamamoto to $3Mx2 bridge deal.

Bring up Holloway.
Bring up Benson.
Bring up Broberg for the first 9.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$3,000,000
1$1,800,000
1$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,500,000
1$4,000,000
3$3,500,000
3$5,000,000
Trades
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the EDM
2022
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2023
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$73,190,172$669,339$2,157,500$8,309,828

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,175,000$1,175,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$834,167$834,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$850,000$850,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,600,000$5,600,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 4
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$785,000$785,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 30, 2021 at 5:37 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 748
I think the value of your contracts are a little off and with that much cap room we definitely need to go after a better 3C
younggreybeard and CD282 liked this.
Jun. 30, 2021 at 5:58 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Quoting: Smokingun71
I think the value of your contracts are a little off and with that much cap room we definitely need to go after a better 3C


Yeah probably! I mostly made this to argue with my friend and know literally almost nothing about GM stuff. Any contract in particular you think is off?
Jun. 30, 2021 at 6:00 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,101
Likes: 7,774
Why didn't you protect Jones in the expansion draft?
younggreybeard liked this.
Jun. 30, 2021 at 6:04 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Quoting: CD282
Why didn't you protect Jones in the expansion draft?


I like Jones, but I figured he was a likely candidate for Seattle to take and Nurse&Bear, Larsson&Oleksiak, Russell&Bouchard would be a good d-core to run with. With Lagesson and Broberg (hopefully) coming up I figured we could afford to take the hit on losing Jones.
Jun. 30, 2021 at 6:37 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,101
Likes: 7,774
Quoting: younggreybeard
I like Jones, but I figured he was a likely candidate for Seattle to take and Nurse&Bear, Larsson&Oleksiak, Russell&Bouchard would be a good d-core to run with. With Lagesson and Broberg (hopefully) coming up I figured we could afford to take the hit on losing Jones.


Who did you protect though? I'm not seeing a logical protection plan that leaves out Jones.
younggreybeard liked this.
Jun. 30, 2021 at 6:41 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Quoting: CD282
Who did you protect though? I'm not seeing a logical protection plan that leaves out Jones.


Oh! I actually just took it from a projected protected list from Bob Stauffer. Which may or may not have been a bad idea haha.

https://twitter.com/Bob_Stauffer/status/1409525726198472707

Edit: When I say I don't know much about GM stuff I'm being very, very serious.
Jun. 30, 2021 at 7:03 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,101
Likes: 7,774
Quoting: younggreybeard
Oh! I actually just took it from a projected protected list from Bob Stauffer. Which may or may not have been a bad idea haha.

https://twitter.com/Bob_Stauffer/status/1409525726198472707

Edit: When I say I don't know much about GM stuff I'm being very, very serious.


Yeah, as Stauffer points out you could hold off the Larsson signing until July 18 and protect Jones. He's better than Russell IMO and would strengthen your bottom pairing. But if Larsson is signed ahead of the expansion draft then it makes sense to protect him.
younggreybeard liked this.
Jun. 30, 2021 at 7:18 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Quoting: CD282
Yeah, as Stauffer points out you could hold off the Larsson signing until July 18 and protect Jones. He's better than Russell IMO and would strengthen your bottom pairing. But if Larsson is signed ahead of the expansion draft then it makes sense to protect him.


Yeah that's a very good point. It seemed like the organization and the coaching staff had zero faith in Jones last season, which was disappointing to see. So Jones and Bouchard for the 3rd pairing? Would we still sign another D for our second pairing, or run Russell-Larsson? Or would you want Russell to be our 7th d-man?

Thanks for commenting! It seems like you're very knowledgeable and it's cool to get feedback and learn more about armchair gm-ing smile
Jun. 30, 2021 at 9:43 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 748
Quoting: younggreybeard
Yeah probably! I mostly made this to argue with my friend and know literally almost nothing about GM stuff. Any contract in particular you think is off?


I would say that you overpaid Yamamoto and Benson by about 1M each, they have no arbitration rights and will have to take a small bridge deal to prove themselves more. Both Oleksiak and Ullmark are about 500k-1M low. Other then that you did a fairly good job.
younggreybeard liked this.
Jun. 30, 2021 at 10:41 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Quoting: Smokingun71
I would say that you overpaid Yamamoto and Benson by about 1M each, they have no arbitration rights and will have to take a small bridge deal to prove themselves more. Both Oleksiak and Ullmark are about 500k-1M low. Other then that you did a fairly good job.


That's definitely a fair point! I had a tough time figuring out Yamo's contract as he was so good in his rookie year, but definitely hit a sophomore slump. $2M bridge sounds more likely. Benson as well sounds about right.

Take ~1M from Yamo and Benson, give 1M to Ullmark and Oleksiak. and my mistakes cancel each other out. Thanks for your input and positivity!
Jul. 2, 2021 at 8:35 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,101
Likes: 7,774
Quoting: younggreybeard
Yeah that's a very good point. It seemed like the organization and the coaching staff had zero faith in Jones last season, which was disappointing to see. So Jones and Bouchard for the 3rd pairing? Would we still sign another D for our second pairing, or run Russell-Larsson? Or would you want Russell to be our 7th d-man?

Thanks for commenting! It seems like you're very knowledgeable and it's cool to get feedback and learn more about armchair gm-ing smile


Yeah, for sure this team needs a 2nd pairing LHD. A short-term solution is fine (1-2 years) as Broberg and Samorukov are pushing for a job this fall and one of them may be ready for a top-4 job as soon as 2022.

Russell should be the 7th man at this point.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll