Great idea. Bring on another big long term contract with an nmc at an already logjammed position. Youre not thinking clearly are you?

I’ll make ur mom think clearly

Tampa passes, McDonagh is one of the reasons why Tampa just won back to back cups. McDonagh isn't going anywhere.

They might leave him exposed, they've had internal discussions ab it (i think they should protect him but who knows)

Theyre not that log jammed at LD, if he played the right side then it'd be a problem

Really in the next year theyll have lindgren, miller, jones, robertson, reunanen, and now would be mcdonagh. The right side has better pieces, the left side has more pieces. Either way the rangers arent trading for a dman wo moving one out.
That being said i think a mcdonagh-fox pairing would be scary as hell but thats a different story.

Not all of those guys are gonna be in the NHL and a number of them could be involved in trades for a center

All are projected to be in the nhl by next year and yes some could be traded for a c but then again so could a RHD, so we obviously werent talking about that.

Idk ab you but I'm taking McDonagh over all the LD prospects on the team next year. Atleast one of them would most likely go back in a trade so its really not a big deal

The trade literally is right at the top of this page. None of those guys that mcdonagh would be taking their spot is in the trade.

Literally labor hajek if you forgot how to read

It seems like you forgot how to read as hes not taking a spot from hajek. If you read my post it clearly says lindgren, miller, jones, robertson, reunanen.

If you forgot what the rangers line up looks like, hajek plays the left side and was playing there this season, so yes he would be taking his spot..... isles fan tryna talk to me ab the rangers lmao

Do you not understand what you read? Mcdonagh hhas 5 years left on his deal, hajek isnt in their long term plans. Yes maybe this year hajek wouldve played some games and now he isnt bc of mcdonagh but that wasnt the point. The point is when youre looking at the next 3-4 years, and towards the long term future, whos spot is he taking. If it was a 1 year deal i would have no problem with it bc hes only "taking a spot" from hajek, but its a long term deal and it causes problems when lindgren, miller, robertson, jones, and now mcdonagh all have to play. Logjam is only a problem when there are guys that have to play. If libor hajek ends up wo a spot, who cares. Hes not part of any long term plan and therefore doesnt have to play.

McDonagh would have his own spot then Lindgren and Miller, everyone else could be traded for picks or a center or something like that. Its not that hard to figure out dude. The rangers have a logjam problem rn so swapping him out McDonagh doesn't change anything other than give the rangers a solid and dependable player instead of a bunch of maybes

You completely didnt get it did you. Rn the rangers have 4-5 guys (not including hajek) that are gonna need a spot on the team. What im saying is theyre not going to trade for another guy who needs a spot for the next 5 years wo sending back 1 of those players. Hajek is at best a 6/7 d. He doesnt require opening a spot for him to play. Guys like lindgren, miller (jones and robertson when theyre ready) will require a spot to play everyday. Therefore any trade that brings in mcdonagh is gonna have 1 of them going back.

Wowwwww no way they have to send back one of them, which is what I literally said above!!! Hmmmmm who would've ever thought that one???

If you scroll up just a little maybe it will remind you of what actually happened in this conversation as you obviously have a hard time remembering.

That is very funny coming from you