No you didn't. In my very first reply I told you that I agreed with your assessment that Colorado is unlikely to trade for Barrie because they know him well (post #11), then in post 17 you wrote:

"you’re acting like COL doesn’t know exactly what Barrie is his strengths and weaknesses"

and then in #21:

"you keep going with Barrie is perennial 50pt guy when he isn’t and is worth a 1st rd pick, when he isn’t , or that COL would take him... when they moved him"

Either you didn't read what I wrote or you have zero reading comprehension. Which is it?


You didn't say that anywhere, you instead accused me of linking numbers from "just this year" (post #21). If you actually had clicked the links you'd see that they were for THREE years, not one, not two. So either you didn't click the links or you're too stupid to read dates. Which is it?


Barrie has scored 244 points over the past 5 seasons (7th most among NHL defensemen), which works out to 48.8 points per season. If you factor in the two shortened seasons (71 and 56 games) his scoring rate works out to 53.7 points per 82 game season. And that's not taking into account games missed due to injury or illness either. So my comment about Tyson Barrie being a "perennial 50-point RHD" is perfectly valid, while your statement that I'm "pushing patently false facts about Barrie’s scoring ability" is, in itself, false.

Consider yourself debunked.

You're welcome.