SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Oilers - Flyers

Created by: Bardownskii
Published: Jun. 28, 2023 at 11:54 a.m.
Salary Cap: $83,500,000
Season Days: 185/186 (99%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has met the central registry's trade checklist

Logo of the Edmonton OilersEdmonton Oilers

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Kulak, BrettEdmonton OilersNHL-$2,735,215011---0000--
Yamamoto, KailerEdmonton OilersNHL-$3,083,333011---0000--
Broberg, PhilipWaivers ExemptEdmonton OilersNHL-$858,691011---0000--
2023 2nd round pick (Logo of the Edmonton OilersEDM)---010------
2024 2nd round pick (Logo of the Edmonton OilersEDM)---010------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Laughton, ScottPhiladelphia FlyersNHL-$2,983,871011---0000--
Sanheim, TravisPhiladelphia FlyersNHL-$6,216,398011---0000--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$5,070,000183443239
Change-$2,523,030-1-1-10-20
Final$2,546,970 (↓)17 (↓)33 (↓)42 (↓)21 (↓)9000

Logo of the Philadelphia FlyersPhiladelphia Flyers

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Laughton, ScottPhiladelphia FlyersNHL-$2,983,871011---0000--
Sanheim, TravisPhiladelphia FlyersNHL-$6,216,398011---0000--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Kulak, BrettEdmonton OilersNHL-$2,735,215011---0000--
Yamamoto, KailerEdmonton OilersNHL-$3,083,333011---0000--
Broberg, PhilipWaivers ExemptEdmonton OilersNHL-$858,691011---0000--
2023 2nd round pick (Logo of the Edmonton OilersEDM)---010------
2024 2nd round pick (Logo of the Edmonton OilersEDM)---010------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$10,372,9051536515715
Change$2,523,030111020
Final$12,895,935 (↑)16 (↑)37 (↑)52 (↑)59 (↑)15000
Jun. 28, 2023 at 11:58 a.m.
#1
Hank
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 368
Oilers decline the only way they are gonna overpay is if TK is included
Jun. 28, 2023 at 11:59 a.m.
#2
Hank
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 368
Oilers also don’t have cap space to afford a deal like this
Jun. 28, 2023 at 12:08 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 108
Likes: 23
Quoting: JKCpp
Oilers decline the only way they are gonna overpay is if TK is included


Over pay???
Broberg is the only player worth the Flyers taking in their situation.
Yamamoto may get value back with a change of scenery for a trade deadline deal but he holds no true value at this time.

Flyers need the Oilers 1st in 2024 to make this come close to working. Still may not be enough seeing as though both Laughton & Sanheim were both reportedly bringing back first rounders and then some.
Jun. 28, 2023 at 12:12 p.m.
#4
Hank
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 368
Quoting: smelly79
Over pay???
Broberg is the only player worth the Flyers taking in their situation.
Yamamoto may get value back with a change of scenery for a trade deadline deal but he holds no true value at this time.

Flyers need the Oilers 1st in 2024 to make this come close to working. Still may not be enough seeing as though both Laughton & Sanheim were both reportedly bringing back first rounders and then some.

This is 100% an overpay lol and oilers can’t afford a trade like this anyway with there cap situation
Jun. 28, 2023 at 12:16 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 108
Likes: 23
Quoting: JKCpp
This is 100% an overpay lol and oilers can’t afford a trade like this anyway with there cap situation


I get the cap part.
That you are spot on about.
However, in the Flyers eyes it is most definitely an UNDER pay.
Jun. 28, 2023 at 12:19 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 108
Likes: 23
Quoting: JKCpp
This is 100% an overpay lol and oilers can’t afford a trade like this anyway with there cap situation


Let me add this.
The Flyers would in all likely hood do themselves a disservice trying to package them both together as the package coming back in the other teams eyes would be to great.
In that regard they likely hold more value separate from each other.
So, I think we may both be correct.
JKCpp liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll