SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Duchene Trade

Created by: HockeyNM1510
Team: 2017-18 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 28, 2017
Published: Jun. 28, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$825,000
2$825,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$900,000
2$825,000
Trades
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2019
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2020
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$75,000,000$64,942,583$0$0$10,057,417

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
$8,625,000$8,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 5
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 1
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 5
$670,000$670,000
RW
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
LW
UFA - 1
$1,750,000$1,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$637,500$637,500
RW, C
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 5
$925,000$925,000
RD
UFA - 1
$2,300,000$2,300,000
G
UFA - 2
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 1
$894,166$894,166
LD
UFA - 3
$825,000$825,000
LD
UFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
$900,000$900,000
RD
UFA - 2
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 28, 2017 at 12:38 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
This has been discussed to death. Duchene isn't going to be a Duck. COL doesn't need Vatanen because they have Barrie. They've already reportedly turned down a better package from NYI in Pulock + Barzal + 1st. If ANA did make contact with COL asking about Duchene, I'm sure the ask would be Lindholm or Fowler. Personally, that's an easy "no" for me. No need to move out D-men that we need for luxury centre depth that we really don't need.
goldie078 liked this.
Jun. 28, 2017 at 12:53 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 229
Quoting: mytduxfan
This has been discussed to death. Duchene isn't going to be a Duck. COL doesn't need Vatanen because they have Barrie. They've already reportedly turned down a better package from NYI in Pulock + Barzal + 1st. If ANA did make contact with COL asking about Duchene, I'm sure the ask would be Lindholm or Fowler. Personally, that's an easy "no" for me. No need to move out D-men that we need for luxury centre depth that we really don't need.


Well if they are asking for Lindholm then I can see why Sakic can't trade Duchene or anyone for that matter. Vatanen can play the left side.
Jun. 28, 2017 at 1:21 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 493
Likes: 30
Replace Nattinen and Petterson with 2 first round picks to turn an easy COL no into a yes.

Sakic may become desperate, but he doesn't have to be a genius to pick the best offer available
Jun. 28, 2017 at 4:22 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 217
Likes: 7
Quoting: HockeyNM1510
Quoting: mytduxfan
This has been discussed to death. Duchene isn't going to be a Duck. COL doesn't need Vatanen because they have Barrie. They've already reportedly turned down a better package from NYI in Pulock + Barzal + 1st. If ANA did make contact with COL asking about Duchene, I'm sure the ask would be Lindholm or Fowler. Personally, that's an easy "no" for me. No need to move out D-men that we need for luxury centre depth that we really don't need.


Well if they are asking for Lindholm then I can see why Sakic can't trade Duchene or anyone for that matter. Vatanen can play the left side.


Barrie can play on the left side as well. I think Ritchie+Vatanen is a solid trade core.
Jun. 28, 2017 at 6:10 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
Quoting: HockeyNM1510
Quoting: mytduxfan
This has been discussed to death. Duchene isn't going to be a Duck. COL doesn't need Vatanen because they have Barrie. They've already reportedly turned down a better package from NYI in Pulock + Barzal + 1st. If ANA did make contact with COL asking about Duchene, I'm sure the ask would be Lindholm or Fowler. Personally, that's an easy "no" for me. No need to move out D-men that we need for luxury centre depth that we really don't need.


Well if they are asking for Lindholm then I can see why Sakic can't trade Duchene or anyone for that matter. Vatanen can play the left side.


Since when? Vatanen is a RH, right side D-man. Yeah, Vatanen can play left side, but not well and nowhere near as good as right side.

Lindholm and Fowler would be the ask from ANA. I'm sure a variety of different offers are being explored.
Jun. 28, 2017 at 6:12 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
Quoting: Campbell
Quoting: HockeyNM1510


Well if they are asking for Lindholm then I can see why Sakic can't trade Duchene or anyone for that matter. Vatanen can play the left side.


Barrie can play on the left side as well. I think Ritchie+Vatanen is a solid trade core.


Don't see it personally. Too many PMDs on COL backline and not enough good quality D-first guys.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll