SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ideal next season roster

Created by: SomeonesOffended
Team: 2024-25 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 18, 2023
Published: Oct. 18, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
3$3,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$10,000,000
5$2,500,000
5$6,500,000
2$3,000,000
2$3,000,000
2$2,000,000
Trades
TOR
    Tanev 50% retained
    CGY
    1. Järnkrok, Calle
    2. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the NYI
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the OTT
    2025
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2026
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$87,700,000$85,526,333$0$0$2,173,667
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $13,250,000$13,250,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $10,903,000$10,903,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $925,000$925,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,000,000$11,000,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $10,000,000$10,000,000
    RW
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    C, RW
    UFA
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $845,833$845,833
    C, LW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $935,833$935,833
    LW, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $850,000$850,000
    LW, RW
    RFA
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,400,000$2,400,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,350,000$1,350,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $7,500,000$7,500,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    RD
    UFA
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $766,667$766,667
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LD/RD
    UFA
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    RD
    RFA
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    G
    UFA
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,100,000$1,100,000
    RD
    RFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $850,000$850,000
    LD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $850,000$850,000
    LW, RW
    RFA

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Oct. 18, 2023 at 11:57 a.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2021
    Posts: 2,170
    Likes: 903
    Let's see if we can really put this idea to bed cause it's just getting tiresome.

    Jarnkrok is 32 getting paid 2.1 million until he is 34.
    The Flames, whose ownership notoriously doesn't retain on deals are eating 2.25M for a player they really like on the roster that they have engaged in extension talks.
    The Leafs 1st round picks in the last 3 years have been 28, 25, 25, with the expectation that they should be lower than that this year.
    The Flames are not tanking this year, they are looking to compete, whether that is right or wrong Chris Tanev helps that, and Tanev helps a D core that's struggling in their own zone while switching systems.
    If the Flames were tanking, there is not a world where Tanev is moved for anything other than future assets that build their prospect pool, not Calle Jarnkrok
    Jarnkrok has a M-NTC, a lot of players have most of Canada on those lists, and there is a good chance he doesn't want to return to the place he had the worst half year of his career.
    If Tanev was on the market at 50% retained 30 teams would put together a better offer than this one.
    Jarnkrok doesn't fill a need for the Flames at any position really, he's exactly what they already have too much of, middling bottom 6 forwards that can slot up and down.
    My best guess is that Tanev will finish the season in Calgary and then move on through free agency, there is nothing wrong with letting your 2nd pair D man fulfill his contract and move on.
    Oct. 18, 2023 at 11:59 a.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    FKA Bigtittielarper
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 7,728
    Likes: 2,226
    Quoting: yycofred
    Let's see if we can really put this idea to bed cause it's just getting tiresome.

    Jarnkrok is 32 getting paid 2.1 million until he is 34.
    The Flames, whose ownership notoriously doesn't retain on deals are eating 2.25M for a player they really like on the roster that they have engaged in extension talks.
    The Leafs 1st round picks in the last 3 years have been 28, 25, 25, with the expectation that they should be lower than that this year.
    The Flames are not tanking this year, they are looking to compete, whether that is right or wrong Chris Tanev helps that, and Tanev helps a D core that's struggling in their own zone while switching systems.
    If the Flames were tanking, there is not a world where Tanev is moved for anything other than future assets that build their prospect pool, not Calle Jarnkrok
    Jarnkrok has a M-NTC, a lot of players have most of Canada on those lists, and there is a good chance he doesn't want to return to the place he had the worst half year of his career.
    If Tanev was on the market at 50% retained 30 teams would put together a better offer than this one.
    Jarnkrok doesn't fill a need for the Flames at any position really, he's exactly what they already have too much of, middling bottom 6 forwards that can slot up and down.
    My best guess is that Tanev will finish the season in Calgary and then move on through free agency, there is nothing wrong with letting your 2nd pair D man fulfill his contract and move on.


    I haven’t seen anyone trying to get tanev not a single person only leaf’s fans
    Oct. 18, 2023 at 12:13 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2019
    Posts: 841
    Likes: 342
    Quoting: SomeonesOffended
    I haven’t seen anyone trying to get tanev not a single person only leaf’s fans


    Most teams who think they are stanley cup contenders are willing to wait a few games to see how their back end shakes out. Toronto already knows it needs a serious upgrade. Closer to trade deadline, if Calgary is out of the running, you can bet there will be multiple suitors for Tanev.
    Oct. 18, 2023 at 12:14 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2021
    Posts: 2,170
    Likes: 903
    Quoting: SomeonesOffended
    I haven’t seen anyone trying to get tanev not a single person only leaf’s fans


    Kinda tells you that he's not really on the market right now then doesn't it?

    Please see points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 of the above comment again.
    Oct. 18, 2023 at 12:22 p.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    FKA Bigtittielarper
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 7,728
    Likes: 2,226
    Quoting: gmurrayt
    Most teams who think they are stanley cup contenders are willing to wait a few games to see how their back end shakes out. Toronto already knows it needs a serious upgrade. Closer to trade deadline, if Calgary is out of the running, you can bet there will be multiple suitors for Tanev.


    I’m sure the leafs would add a 3rd if they’re getting out bid but he isn’t worth more than that he isn’t even worth that that’s already the equivalent of a 1st and a 3rd going for him
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll