SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Helping teams to help ourselves

Created by: Rob32sjsharks
Team: 2023-24 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 26, 2023
Published: Oct. 26, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I get these deals will be argued over and a lot of fans say “no way” or “not a chance”. But it’s not ACGM without controversy.

I fee these trades all help the teams in the trades and sharks recoup a hefty bit of draft capitol.
Win win in my mind and taking in the cap dumps isn’t an issue cause we won’t be relevant till 26/27 anyways.
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Eller, Lars
  2. Ruhwedel, Chad
  3. 2026 2nd round pick (PIT)
PIT
  1. Benning, Matthew
  2. Sturm, Nico
Additional Details:
Pittsburgh gets 2 solid upgrades to help their Bottom 6 and bottom pair D.
2.
SJS
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
Depth offense 50% retained for a late 2nd.
NYR
  1. Duclair, Anthony ($1,500,000 retained)
3.
SJS
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (SJS)
ANA
  1. Rutta, Jan
Additional Details:
Not sure where or for what but GM typically over value RD
4.
SJS
  1. Campbell, Jack
  2. Janmark, Mattias
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (EDM)
  4. 2025 1st round pick (EDM)
  5. 2026 2nd round pick (EDM)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WSH
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$74,601,668$25,000$1,145,000$8,898,332
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$916,667$916,667
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,450,000$2,450,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$775,000$775,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$789,167$789,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$775,000$775,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$762,500$762,500 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 26, 2023 at 7:46 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 603
Likes: 155
Edmonton does that all day long
Oct. 26, 2023 at 8:01 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 602
Likes: 180
I dont think the rangers do this, even though its fair value.
From what Im seeing the whole in the lineup is at 3rd RW, where wheeler is. I dont think duclair fits that spot at all.
Oct. 26, 2023 at 8:18 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,463
Likes: 4,799
Quoting: slater417
I dont think the rangers do this, even though its fair value.
From what Im seeing the whole in the lineup is at 3rd RW, where wheeler is. I dont think duclair fits that spot at all.

Duclair can play off wing! But I get it, just send a lot of Duclair to NYR so I sent him there
Oct. 26, 2023 at 8:20 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,463
Likes: 4,799
Quoting: JesikaMorris
Edmonton does that all day long


I only do it because we can have him back up this season and next then buy out the last 2 years and it’s not horrid especially with the cap space sharks have in 24/25 & 25/26
JesikaMorris liked this.
Oct. 26, 2023 at 8:23 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 603
Likes: 155
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I only do it because we can have him back up this season and next then buy out the last 2 years and it’s not horrid especially with the cap space sharks have in 24/25 & 25/26


Well said sir
Oct. 26, 2023 at 9:16 p.m.
#6
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 18,793
Likes: 6,835
Rangers aren’t interested in depleting their draft pool any further. Likely route is they waive/trade Wheeler and call up Othmann to fill their W issue.
Oct. 26, 2023 at 9:29 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,463
Likes: 4,799
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Rangers aren’t interested in depleting their draft pool any further. Likely route is they waive/trade Wheeler and call up Othmann to fill their W issue.


Probably smarter but I’ve seen a lot of Duclair to NYR is all. Could honestly be to anyone.
Oct. 26, 2023 at 9:52 p.m.
#8
RecycleShark
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 346
Sharks need more from Edmonton. The other trades are fair.
Oct. 26, 2023 at 10:00 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 442
I think it's a little early into Eller's tenure as a Penguin to give up on him, but I think the Pens would accept closer to the trade deadline if he doesn't get better.
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
Oct. 26, 2023 at 10:34 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,463
Likes: 4,799
Quoting: RecycleShark
Sharks need more from Edmonton. The other trades are fair.


If you look at Campbells buyout it’s very reasonable after this year or next! This is probably the max they even consider and it gives the sharks a bunch more pieces to rebuild their arsenal
Oct. 27, 2023 at 9:53 a.m.
#11
CCM46
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 638
Likes: 246
I honestly don't feel like Sturm is an upgrade over Eller.

In looking it seems that are somewhat same kind of level of production around 30ish points at their peak. Yes Sturm maybe a couple years younger, but in looking at how Eller is currently playing as 3C for the Pens I am not sure that I would want to break up that chemistry because at times the 3rd line has seemed like the best line and can be thrown out into an situation.

Benning would definitely be an upgrade to Ruh..... but would it really be worth a 2nd that Im not sure of especially when there could possibly be better options available for that package .

Based off that I would say Pens decline mainly due to Eller, and could possibly revisit and rework a Benning for Ruh deal with maybe a 3rd or 4th instead of a 2nd.
Oct. 27, 2023 at 12:17 p.m.
#12
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,166
Likes: 990
Quoting: CCM46
I honestly don't feel like Sturm is an upgrade over Eller.

In looking it seems that are somewhat same kind of level of production around 30ish points at their peak. Yes Sturm maybe a couple years younger, but in looking at how Eller is currently playing as 3C for the Pens I am not sure that I would want to break up that chemistry because at times the 3rd line has seemed like the best line and can be thrown out into an situation.

Benning would definitely be an upgrade to Ruh..... but would it really be worth a 2nd that Im not sure of especially when there could possibly be better options available for that package .

Based off that I would say Pens decline mainly due to Eller, and could possibly revisit and rework a Benning for Ruh deal with maybe a 3rd or 4th instead of a 2nd.


I mean when you're looking at a 3rd/4th line role, Sturm fits that mold MUCH better. Sturm is a high energy player, great on the forecheck, ELITE penalty killer. He doesn't have that offensive upside that Eller does but I don't think Pitt is really looking for that right now. Also slightly better cap hit and the age is more of a factor for next year. You can reliably count on Sturm being the same player next year, whereas at 34 Eller could really drop off next year
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
Oct. 27, 2023 at 12:18 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,463
Likes: 4,799
Quoting: CCM46
I honestly don't feel like Sturm is an upgrade over Eller.

In looking it seems that are somewhat same kind of level of production around 30ish points at their peak. Yes Sturm maybe a couple years younger, but in looking at how Eller is currently playing as 3C for the Pens I am not sure that I would want to break up that chemistry because at times the 3rd line has seemed like the best line and can be thrown out into an situation.

Benning would definitely be an upgrade to Ruh..... but would it really be worth a 2nd that Im not sure of especially when there could possibly be better options available for that package .

Based off that I would say Pens decline mainly due to Eller, and could possibly revisit and rework a Benning for Ruh deal with maybe a 3rd or 4th instead of a 2nd.

Sturm is better, better PK and in a deeper stronger team will have more offensive opportunity. I just heard Dorian is trying to fix the bottom 6 and bottom pair D
Oct. 27, 2023 at 12:19 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,463
Likes: 4,799
Quoting: AStovetop
I mean when you're looking at a 3rd/4th line role, Sturm fits that mold MUCH better. Sturm is a high energy player, great on the forecheck, ELITE penalty killer. He doesn't have that offensive upside that Eller does but I don't think Pitt is really looking for that right now. Also slightly better cap hit and the age is more of a factor for next year. You can reliably count on Sturm being the same player next year, whereas at 34 Eller could really drop off next year


I would argue he already has.
Oct. 30, 2023 at 1:28 p.m.
#15
CCM46
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 638
Likes: 246
Quoting: AStovetop
I mean when you're looking at a 3rd/4th line role, Sturm fits that mold MUCH better. Sturm is a high energy player, great on the forecheck, ELITE penalty killer. He doesn't have that offensive upside that Eller does but I don't think Pitt is really looking for that right now. Also slightly better cap hit and the age is more of a factor for next year. You can reliably count on Sturm being the same player next year, whereas at 34 Eller could really drop off next year


I'll keep it real I really haven't watched Sturm enough to know what his fit would look like, however what I have watched of Eller on the 3rd line for the Pens would not be easily replaceable in terms of chemistry. The way him, Big Z, and O'Connor work together has made them into a line that can be trusted in all situations defensively and offensively. My fear would be you lose the offensive side when you add in Sturm. Additionally, you would lose Ellers presence in the locker room which he appears to be in a leadership role (in terms of pecking order probably 5th behind Sid, Geno, Tanger, and Karlsson).

As far as next year I even stated in my original Sturm is a few years younger, but isn't really a prospect level talent isn't really developing anymore, so what you have to look at is what is the likelihood someone like Eller falls off tremendously. Which given Eller's style of play (which isn't really physical and has never been the best skater on any team) I wouldn't expect him to fall off as rapidly as someone who posses that physical or speed game.

The slightly better cap hit you're looking at 450K difference which isn't even league minimum.

All of this I still feel like no need to make the move for Sturm at least with Eller as the piece returning to the Sharks.

The only possible move I see that would vastly improve Penguins situation is finding a way to not dress 77 night in and night out and addressing the 3rd pair defense.
Oct. 30, 2023 at 7:05 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,463
Likes: 4,799
Quoting: CCM46
I'll keep it real I really haven't watched Sturm enough to know what his fit would look like, however what I have watched of Eller on the 3rd line for the Pens would not be easily replaceable in terms of chemistry. The way him, Big Z, and O'Connor work together has made them into a line that can be trusted in all situations defensively and offensively. My fear would be you lose the offensive side when you add in Sturm. Additionally, you would lose Ellers presence in the locker room which he appears to be in a leadership role (in terms of pecking order probably 5th behind Sid, Geno, Tanger, and Karlsson).

As far as next year I even stated in my original Sturm is a few years younger, but isn't really a prospect level talent isn't really developing anymore, so what you have to look at is what is the likelihood someone like Eller falls off tremendously. Which given Eller's style of play (which isn't really physical and has never been the best skater on any team) I wouldn't expect him to fall off as rapidly as someone who posses that physical or speed game.

The slightly better cap hit you're looking at 450K difference which isn't even league minimum.

All of this I still feel like no need to make the move for Sturm at least with Eller as the piece returning to the Sharks.

The only possible move I see that would vastly improve Penguins situation is finding a way to not dress 77 night in and night out and addressing the 3rd pair defense.


I don’t agree with your assessment.
1st. While Sturm is what he is (9-13G 20-35P) he is also fast hood skater well above average face off guy and one of the best PK guys in the league, to me he is clearly better than Ellers and will be even more so next year. (Sharks suck so you gotta use the eye test not the numbers!)
And Benning is a big upgrade. But if you guy pass that’s not an issue as another team would jump on this! RD and depth C who are both good on PK are always people of interest to clubs.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 10:06 a.m.
#17
CCM46
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 638
Likes: 246
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I don’t agree with your assessment.
1st. While Sturm is what he is (9-13G 20-35P) he is also fast hood skater well above average face off guy and one of the best PK guys in the league, to me he is clearly better than Ellers and will be even more so next year. (Sharks suck so you gotta use the eye test not the numbers!)
And Benning is a big upgrade. But if you guy pass that’s not an issue as another team would jump on this! RD and depth C who are both good on PK are always people of interest to clubs.


You may not agree with my assessment and that's perfectly fine, however as I mentioned I haven't watched any Sharks games and probably will only watch 2 of their games all year. That being said I still see Sturm and Eller as similar in production levels throughout their careers and think that moving Eller would end up hurting more than helping unless he is moved for a more scoring option that still brings a defensive side to their game. I do not see Sturm being an option for that.

I wouldn't mind acquiring Benning and would be open to doing a swap of Ruhwedel for him and say add a 3rd/4th round pick to the deal.

I do not think it is necessary for the Pens to give up their only really depth scoring option and get back a player who does not shoot the puck (which would only add to Pens depth problems of not having any scoring). Especially when I have seen Calgary posts sending Dube to the Pens which imo is more upside than trading for a guy like Sturm
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll