SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trying scenarios out

Created by: gegemoroo
Team: 2023-24 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 7, 2023
Published: Nov. 7, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Unprotected '24 1st round pick or,
'24 and '25 protected 1st round picks for taking Campbell.
It's a risky move for Edmonton, but they get depth in offence, defence and a goaltender.
Duclair = Finals last year, forward that will score with a good offensive team.
Rutta = Stanley Cup winning 3rd pair RD, perfect for Edmonton
Blackwood = Played out of his mind for this awful Sharks team.

I understand if Oilers fans get mad, but I feel like they will bounce back after a rocky start. They need to get rid of that Campbell contract asap.

Columbus:
Hertl is their future 2nd line C with Fantilli growing. Columbus loses depth pieces and a bad contract in a process.
Adam Boqvist and 1st are the main pieces coming back to Sharks, since we need an RD that has some potential.
Also Sharks trust that they can draft Celebrini with their own 1st round pick and draft bunch of defencemen with their other 1st round picks.
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Campbell, Jack
  2. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
2.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WSH
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
26$83,500,000$80,743,334$25,000$1,285,000$2,756,666
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$789,167$789,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$762,500$762,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 7, 2023 at 7:18 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 2,363
Likes: 1,221
Suggesting that Blackwood has played “out of his mind” is a stretch, but it is hard to even truly judge a goalies performance level while playing behind that team. Nonetheless, I’m sure EDM would be fine with bringing him back if it meant Campbell is moved. However, I’m sure they’d have no interest in Rutta. Why clear cap space just to throw it away at an over the hill bottom pair d man? With Rutta removed, sure, this proposal is in the realm of possibility. IMHO.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 7:22 a.m.
#2
not a he )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 3,373
Likes: 4,695
I think Columbus declines the deal as presented, even if we fans think that would be foolish. Kuraly and Gudbranson wear letters, and somehow Gudbranson was the best defenseman on the team last night (genuinely, too, not just by default). Young teams like Columbus need veterans like Kuraly and Gudbranson. Roslovic and Peeke, though?
Nov. 7, 2023 at 7:22 a.m.
#3
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 574
Nobody in the league is taking the Campbell contract. Any Campbell trade starts at two firsts minimum before adding anything going back the other way. Edit* My bad I saw the description with the first being unprotected but I still think thats way too light - what would be a mid first is still not enough to dump Campbell

Quoting: JuanDamienNebraska
Suggesting that Blackwood has played “out of his mind” is a stretch, but it is hard to even truly judge a goalies performance level while playing behind that team. Nonetheless, I’m sure EDM would be fine with bringing him back if it meant Campbell is moved. However, I’m sure they’d have no interest in Rutta. Why clear cap space just to throw it away at an over the hill bottom pair d man? With Rutta removed, sure, this proposal is in the realm of possibility. IMHO.


Blackwood has played out of his mind and that is not a stretch at all.
squashmaple liked this.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 7:26 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 2,363
Likes: 1,221
Quoting: sharcuda22
Nobody in the league is taking the Campbell contract. Any Campbell trade starts at two firsts minimum before adding anything going back the other way. Edit* My bad I saw the description with the first being unprotected but I still think thats way too light - what would be a mid first is still not enough to dump Campbell



Blackwood has played out of his mind and that is not a stretch at all.


I’m not saying the trade is correct or incorrect. I didn’t propose it. Simply commenting on some aspects of it.

His numbers and what I’ve seen from him suggest otherwise, but again, it’s hard to fault him or get a real gauge on him while playing on that team.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 7:28 a.m.
#5
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 574
Quoting: JuanDamienNebraska
His numbers and what I’ve seen from him suggest otherwise, but again, it’s hard to fault him or get a real gauge on him while playing on that team.


If you dont watch him and only look at stats sure (the sharks just conceded 20 goals in two games). He hasn't let in anything soft. He hasn't let in anything he shouldn't have essentially and has had the team in front of him quit to the point where there are essentially free screens or other team just passes around him. If you dont watch the sharks I dont blame you but dont slander the only good thing to come from this season so far for us. I think around the league everyone has been pretty universal in the Blackwood is back to best statements
Burnzie8_88_4Cup liked this.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 7:36 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 2,363
Likes: 1,221
Quoting: sharcuda22
If you dont watch him and only look at stats sure (the sharks just conceded 20 goals in two games). He hasn't let in anything soft. He hasn't let in anything he shouldn't have essentially and has had the team in front of him quit to the point where there are essentially free screens or other team just passes around him. If you dont watch the sharks I dont blame you but dont slander the only good thing to come from this season so far for us. I think around the league everyone has been pretty universal in the Blackwood is back to best statements


Strange of you to assume I haven’t watched any Sharks this year after I clearly stated “from what I’ve seen of him”. Why so defensive? I’m not slandering him. I’m stating simple facts, and doing so objectively. I’ve witnessed him let in horrendous goals and numbers don’t tell the full story, but they tell a damn good portion of it. For the third time, I don’t necessarily fault him while playing on such a bad team. I have no care in the world to go out of my way to “slander” any player, let alone Mackenzie Blackwood?
Nov. 7, 2023 at 7:45 a.m.
#7
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 574
Quoting: JuanDamienNebraska
Strange of you to assume I haven’t watched any Sharks this year after I clearly stated “from what I’ve seen of him”. Why so defensive? I’m not slandering him. I’m stating simple facts, and doing so objectively. I’ve witnessed him let in horrendous goals and numbers don’t tell the full story, but they tell a damn good portion of it. For the third time, I don’t necessarily fault him while playing on such a bad team. I have no care in the world to go out of my way to “slander” any player, let alone Mackenzie Blackwood?


he hasn't let in any horrendous goals while playing for teal except for maybe his first preseason start - I see youre a gains fan?
Quoting: JuanDamienNebraska
Strange of you to assume I haven’t watched any Sharks this year after I clearly stated “from what I’ve seen of him”. Why so defensive? I’m not slandering him. I’m stating simple facts, and doing so objectively. I’ve witnessed him let in horrendous goals and numbers don’t tell the full story, but they tell a damn good portion of it. For the third time, I don’t necessarily fault him while playing on such a bad team. I have no care in the world to go out of my way to “slander” any player, let alone Mackenzie Blackwood?


I mean I see youre a guins fan so I was just assuming you've only watched the one game lol. Youre telling me you consistently watch the sharks this season -_- be real.

The only bad performance Blackwood has had with us is his first preseason start
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll