SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

VCR Deadline

Created by: westleysnipez
Team: 2023-24 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 19, 2024
Published: Jan. 20, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Some smart trades
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Lindholm, Elias
1$1,212,500
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. Lindholm, Elias ($2,425,000 retained)
CGY
  1. Brzustewicz, Hunter [Reserve List]
  2. Karlsson, Linus
  3. 2024 1st round pick (VAN)
  4. 2025 2nd round pick (VAN)
2.
VAN
    Retains 1.21M
    CBJ
    1. Lindholm, Elias
    2. 2024 4th round pick (NJD)
    3.
    MTL
    1. Bloom, Josh
    2. Friedman, Mark ($40,000 retained)
    3. 2024 3rd round pick (VAN)
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the VAN
    2025
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    2026
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$83,500,000$83,499,584$850,000$0$416
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $7,350,000$7,350,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $8,000,000$8,000,000
    C, LW, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $6,650,000$6,650,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $4,750,000$4,750,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Lindholm, Elias
    $1,212,500$1,212,500
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $825,000$825,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,900,000$1,900,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $4,950,000$4,950,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,100,000$1,100,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,600,000$1,600,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,150,000$1,150,000
    RW, C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $883,750$883,750
    C
    RFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $7,850,000$7,850,000
    LD
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $4,400,000$4,400,000
    RD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,800,000$1,800,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,250,000$3,250,000
    LD/RD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $775,000$775,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $766,667$766,667
    RD
    UFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $775,000$775,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $775,000$775,000
    LW
    UFA - 2

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jan. 20 at 12:06 a.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2022
    Posts: 3,130
    Likes: 2,235
    That feels like a lot for a 7th/8th dman
    Jan. 20 at 12:09 a.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2022
    Posts: 3,789
    Likes: 1,208
    I don’t know what’s going on in trades 1 and 2.
    MTL will rather trade Kovacevic somewhere else besides Vancouver. I can’t see Vancouver having interest in Kovacevic.
    Jan. 20 at 12:39 a.m.
    #3
    Thread Starter
    westleysnipez
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,368
    Likes: 586
    Quoting: Vancity2196
    I don’t know what’s going on in trades 1 and 2.
    MTL will rather trade Kovacevic somewhere else besides Vancouver. I can’t see Vancouver having interest in Kovacevic.


    Lindholm w/double retention (1.2125M) for a 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Bruiser + Karlsson

    The Canucks are keen on improving the size on the backend and Kovacevic meets all the criteria. Friedman is undersized and makes the most sense to move if they're going for an upgrade.
    Jan. 20 at 1:38 a.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2022
    Posts: 3,789
    Likes: 1,208
    Quoting: westleysnipez
    Lindholm w/double retention (1.2125M) for a 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Bruiser + Karlsson

    The Canucks are keen on improving the size on the backend and Kovacevic meets all the criteria. Friedman is undersized and makes the most sense to move if they're going for an upgrade.


    Do you think the Lindholm would work for both sides?
    In your opinion?
    I’m just curious to ask 🤔
    Jan. 20 at 2:00 a.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2021
    Posts: 1,013
    Likes: 262
    Re: Jim Rutherford, No BIG changes for Canucks at Deadline. There will be some good support players they go after without selling the farm. Allvin and Jimmy have been consistent. They want to build the team for the long term, which means not selling off the prospects.
    Jan. 20 at 2:31 a.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    westleysnipez
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,368
    Likes: 586
    Quoting: Vancity2196
    Do you think the Lindholm would work for both sides?
    In your opinion?
    I’m just curious to ask 🤔


    It depends on how February goes for the Flames. If the Flames still find themselves 10th in P% next month, I expect they go the sellers route rather than risk all their UFAs walking for a failed playoff berth.

    If that happens, I think this offer would be difficult to beat for another team and I think Calgary would go for it. Look at how much Horvat earned last year after many 30g-60p seasons and pacing at a career-high rate of 0.64 G/GP (52-goal pace). I think this offer of 1st + 2nd + Brz. + Karlsson > 1st + Raty + Beauvillier, and that was with Horvat retained 25%. Even if the Flames want to retool around Huberdeau, Weegar/Andersson, and Markstrom; the 1st, 2nd, and Bruiser give them assets they could move for a young NHLer the same way Ottawa did for DeBrincat or Chychrun.

    As for Lindholm, he pretty much fits any team. Top-10 in Selke voting twice (2nd-place finish two seasons ago), plays both special teams, and is a bonafide 1B center in the NHL similar to Kesler 2009-2014. He'd immediately bring back the scoring threat our 2nd line has been lacking since the return of the Lotto Line two weeks ago. Even if you want to take Pettersson back off the Lotto line, having Lindholm just gives you so many more combinations. Plus, the Canucks would have 5 centers to swap between (Miller, Pettersson, Lindholm, Sutter, and Blueger), Lindholm would free up Petey and/or Miller from PK duties (Selke nominated). There are just so many good reasons with Lindholm.
    Vancity2196 liked this.
    Jan. 20 at 2:33 a.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    westleysnipez
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,368
    Likes: 586
    Quoting: Dickie_Dunn
    Re: Jim Rutherford, No BIG changes for Canucks at Deadline. There will be some good support players they go after without selling the farm. Allvin and Jimmy have been consistent. They want to build the team for the long term, which means not selling off the prospects.


    Do you have a source for that?

    All the reports I've seen have said the Canucks plan on being aggressive at the Deadline.

    Canucks GM Patrik Allvin on being aggressive ahead of trade deadline: “I think I owe it to the players. We know that they are capable of playing at this high level. And if they continue to do that, it's on me to support them and give them opportunities to be successful.” - reported by Iain MacIntyre 01/17/24
    Jan. 20 at 12:32 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2021
    Posts: 1,013
    Likes: 262
    Listen to the interview with 650 for god sake!
    Jan. 20 at 1:21 p.m.
    #9
    Thread Starter
    westleysnipez
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,368
    Likes: 586
    Quoting: Dickie_Dunn
    Listen to the interview with 650 for god sake!


    I'm asking you for a source. Can you link the timestamp of the episode? Or a direct quote from Rutherford. Just saying "Go listen to the radio!," isn't a source.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll