SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline

Created by: TySmith4Norris
Team: 2023-24 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 5, 2024
Published: Feb. 5, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Graves, Ryan
  2. Smith, Ty
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (PIT)
2.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NYR
2025
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
2026
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$78,226,604$0$0$5,273,396
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$800,000$800,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$6,100,000$6,100,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,125,000$5,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,571,429$2,571,429
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,450,000$2,450,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$775,000$775,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,025,175$4,025,175
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,375,000$5,375,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$6,100,000$6,100,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$775,000$775,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,125,000$3,125,000
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 5 at 1:44 p.m.
#1
boltsfan71
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 696
flames decline
Feb. 5 at 1:48 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 93
Likes: 53
Yeah both those trades are very pens friendly… add a first to both trades and then you’re closer
Feb. 5 at 1:52 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 909
What asset is Calgary getting for Hanifan? All I see is a 2nd and Smith for taking on the Graves contract.

Joseph has little or no trade value per Pittsburgh's own Matt Vensel of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
nyrfan81 liked this.
Feb. 5 at 1:54 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 1,498
Blues have no reason to trade hayes for Acciari plus POJ let alone add retention.
Feb. 5 at 9:10 p.m.
#5
SkateOrDie
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 2,964
Likes: 463
Quoting: hero9154
What asset is Calgary getting for Hanifan? All I see is a 2nd and Smith for taking on the Graves contract.

Joseph has little or no trade value per Pittsburgh's own Matt Vensel of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.


Matt would be correct.
You on the other hand are not. Graves is not a cap dump. Graves is an average 2nd pairing guy on an average 2nd pairing ava.
You act like he's a cap dump, he's not.
PIT would never make that trade. It's lopsided for CGY.
Feb. 6 at 10:05 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 198
Likes: 63
Quoting: hero9154
What asset is Calgary getting for Hanifan? All I see is a 2nd and Smith for taking on the Graves contract.

Joseph has little or no trade value per Pittsburgh's own Matt Vensel of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.


This is 10000% absolutely the correct take. The Graves contract is going to age very poorly.
Feb. 6 at 10:19 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 909
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
Matt would be correct.
You on the other hand are not. Graves is not a cap dump. Graves is an average 2nd pairing guy on an average 2nd pairing ava.
You act like he's a cap dump, he's not.
PIT would never make that trade. It's lopsided for CGY.


While not a cap dump per se, Pittsburgh would not get equal value for a struggling 2nd pair defenseman which is why they are looking for defense help and someone to play with Karlsson on the second pairing. $4.5M for a soon to be 29 year old with 5 more years after this one is a lot to ask someone to take on.
Feb. 6 at 6:14 p.m.
#8
SkateOrDie
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 2,964
Likes: 463
Quoting: hero9154
While not a cap dump per se, Pittsburgh would not get equal value for a struggling 2nd pair defenseman which is why they are looking for defense help and someone to play with Karlsson on the second pairing. $4.5M for a soon to be 29 year old with 5 more years after this one is a lot to ask someone to take on.


Graves is not a cap dump. They are not "looking" for someone to play with Karlsson.
Graves is running a 50% corsi and fenwick.
He's an average 2nd pair defenseman on a roughly average 2nd pairing salary.
What exactly do you think you get out of an average defenseman in the NHL?
I hate to break it to you, but the other teams score goals too.
Feb. 7 at 10:08 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 909
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
Graves is not a cap dump. They are not "looking" for someone to play with Karlsson.
Graves is running a 50% corsi and fenwick.
He's an average 2nd pair defenseman on a roughly average 2nd pairing salary.
What exactly do you think you get out of an average defenseman in the NHL?
I hate to break it to you, but the other teams score goals too.


Just so you know, i'm not making this up. Here is the article from the Athletic with the Pittsburgh looking for defensive help and for someone to play with Karlsson. (https://theathletic.com/5234766/2024/01/31/penguins-jake-guentzel-trade-mailbag/). I believe it was Phil Bourque also reiterated this on nhl radio.

"If the Penguins go into full buyer mode, which is possible, I think they need to address the blue line. I wouldn’t have said this a couple of months ago. However, Ryan Graves’ continuing struggles are impossible to ignore. Graves actually played OK on the third pairing with Chad Ruhwedel, but he’s displayed no aptitude to play with Karlsson or Letang. So, finding someone to play top-four minutes on the left side is mandatory."

Again, not my words but people who cover the Penguins. And again, I never said he was a cap dump, that Pittsburgh won't get fair value for him due to a combination of his struggles and contract. Average defenseman is a #5 - #7 dman since there are more average players than good/great players.
Feb. 7 at 8:02 p.m.
#10
SkateOrDie
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 2,964
Likes: 463
Quoting: hero9154
Just so you know, i'm not making this up. Here is the article from the Athletic with the Pittsburgh looking for defensive help and for someone to play with Karlsson. (https://theathletic.com/5234766/2024/01/31/penguins-jake-guentzel-trade-mailbag/). I believe it was Phil Bourque also reiterated this on nhl radio.

"If the Penguins go into full buyer mode, which is possible, I think they need to address the blue line. I wouldn’t have said this a couple of months ago. However, Ryan Graves’ continuing struggles are impossible to ignore. Graves actually played OK on the third pairing with Chad Ruhwedel, but he’s displayed no aptitude to play with Karlsson or Letang. So, finding someone to play top-four minutes on the left side is mandatory."

Again, not my words but people who cover the Penguins. And again, I never said he was a cap dump, that Pittsburgh won't get fair value for him due to a combination of his struggles and contract. Average defenseman is a #5 - #7 dman since there are more average players than good/great players.


Welcome to the internet, I know you are new here.
Let me give you some pointers.
That is called clickbait.....don't press it.

Their job is to say whatever sells clicks. "IF".......
Graves has never been a 3rd pair. Anyone looking at the minutes on the ice knows this. He is consistantly 4th. Simply go to fantasy tools, depth chart, penguins. and you can clearly see he plays 19:19 a night on average while the other two there are playing 12 and 13 minutes. That has not changed.
The other option on the LD is POJ and a rotating cast because he sucks and is AHL level.
So please don't tell me about how he's been a "3rd pairing". You clearly DO NOT KNOW.

His play has been average, his stats show this, not just the basic stats where his points are ok and he's a net + player on the ice, but his advanced stats like Corsi and Fenwick.

You read some total garbage on the internet and then come sprouting opinions. Try actually watching games to form opinions instead of being a useful clickbait idiot.
Maybe some research into players stats, etc... Hell both MP and Graves are playing with two guys in Letang and EK who are known to make bone head decisions. Yes they can be very good, but in their own end their are low light reels of bad decision making. Look at the letang to malkin pass for an empty net goal for an easy example this year.
Graves has been fine. The people who have issue with graves are the ones who need "something" to complain about for clicks......and well there you.
I won't get into why they blame graves instead of pointing out the horrible 3rd pairing of AHL level talent. Or the rotating forward group of AHL level quality.
Somethings are just easier to get a click on i guess without getting backlash....
Feb. 8 at 9:46 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 909
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
Welcome to the internet, I know you are new here.
Let me give you some pointers.
That is called clickbait.....don't press it.

Their job is to say whatever sells clicks. "IF".......
Graves has never been a 3rd pair. Anyone looking at the minutes on the ice knows this. He is consistantly 4th. Simply go to fantasy tools, depth chart, penguins. and you can clearly see he plays 19:19 a night on average while the other two there are playing 12 and 13 minutes. That has not changed.
The other option on the LD is POJ and a rotating cast because he sucks and is AHL level.
So please don't tell me about how he's been a "3rd pairing". You clearly DO NOT KNOW.

His play has been average, his stats show this, not just the basic stats where his points are ok and he's a net + player on the ice, but his advanced stats like Corsi and Fenwick.

You read some total garbage on the internet and then come sprouting opinions. Try actually watching games to form opinions instead of being a useful clickbait idiot.
Maybe some research into players stats, etc... Hell both MP and Graves are playing with two guys in Letang and EK who are known to make bone head decisions. Yes they can be very good, but in their own end their are low light reels of bad decision making. Look at the letang to malkin pass for an empty net goal for an easy example this year.
Graves has been fine. The people who have issue with graves are the ones who need "something" to complain about for clicks......and well there you.
I won't get into why they blame graves instead of pointing out the horrible 3rd pairing of AHL level talent. Or the rotating forward group of AHL level quality.
Somethings are just easier to get a click on i guess without getting backlash....


I guess people with direct interaction and knowledge with the Pittsburgh organization know nothing about what their needs are...got it. I'll take the opinion of someone who has never played the game above a beer league level.

That being said, I have watched Graves play for years and this year he has had regression especially on the offensive end. His defensive numbers are still good. I don't know if he thinks he has to take on a more defensive role or not which is why his offense has suffered. Agree that Karlsson can make bonehead plays which puts his partner in a tough spot but I don't put that on Graves. My issue was with your trade not Graves...don't know where you thought I was dumping on him. Graves and a mid 2nd round pick for Hanifin is not enough. And who knows if Graves has calgary on his no trade list. The article and NHL program I referenced were not my opinions, just what was read and heard from people with direct knowledge and interaction with the organization.
Feb. 8 at 4:14 p.m.
#12
SkateOrDie
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 2,964
Likes: 463
Quoting: hero9154
I guess people with direct interaction and knowledge with the Pittsburgh organization know nothing about what their needs are...got it. I'll take the opinion of someone who has never played the game above a beer league level.

That being said, I have watched Graves play for years and this year he has had regression especially on the offensive end. His defensive numbers are still good. I don't know if he thinks he has to take on a more defensive role or not which is why his offense has suffered. Agree that Karlsson can make bonehead plays which puts his partner in a tough spot but I don't put that on Graves. My issue was with your trade not Graves...don't know where you thought I was dumping on him. Graves and a mid 2nd round pick for Hanifin is not enough. And who knows if Graves has calgary on his no trade list. The article and NHL program I referenced were not my opinions, just what was read and heard from people with direct knowledge and interaction with the organization.


A. this is not "my trade"
B. the whole convesation was about the value of graves.
C. I played college hockey.
so strike 3 on all. Good day.
Feb. 8 at 4:20 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 909
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
A. this is not "my trade"
B. the whole convesation was about the value of graves.
C. I played college hockey.
so strike 3 on all. Good day.


1. You never said it wasn't your trade
2. Conversation was Graves and the 2nd was not enough for Hanifin
3. So did i
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll