SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Soft Sell to prepare for the summer

Created by: STLBlues17
Team: 2023-24 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 13, 2024
Published: Feb. 13, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
Trades
1.
STL
  1. Kyrou, Christian
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (DAL)
DAL
  1. Faulk, Justin
Additional Details:
Not exactly sure how to balance the cap out, but could take back Faksa or some other expensive short term contracts.
2.
STL
  1. 2024 7th round pick (CHI)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2026
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$76,965,179$20,000$0$6,534,821

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,800,000$5,800,000
LW, RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$925,000$925,000
RW, C
RFA
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$835,833$835,833
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,571,429$3,571,429
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$883,750$883,750
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,275,000$3,275,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
LD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$816,667$816,667
C
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 13 at 11:29 a.m.
#1
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,266
Likes: 11,347
Not really interested in the first one, don't see the point of the second one. I'm not against shopping Faulk by any means, but I'm not stranding Colt on RD for a tiny Dman prospect. He already has enough weight on his shoulders.
Feb. 13 at 11:32 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Sam
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,240
Likes: 2,188
Quoting: mokumboi
Not really interested in the first one, don't see the point of the second one. I'm not against shopping Faulk by any means, but I'm not stranding Colt on RD for a tiny Dman prospect. He already has enough weight on his shoulders.


The 6.5 million in cap-space is more valuable to me than having Faulk on the roster. Faulk is alright, but that money can be used to get a younger and more impactful player. Team has been fine without him.
Feb. 13 at 11:49 a.m.
#3
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,266
Likes: 11,347
Quoting: STLBlues17
The 6.5 million in cap-space is more valuable to me than having Faulk on the roster. Faulk is alright, but that money can be used to get a younger and more impactful player.

Team has been fine without him.


1 - My first point is, fine, I'm totally with you on the general concept. But that doesn't change the fact that we could ask for something that fits our needs, especially since he's moving in the division.

Also, what player are you eying with such lavish new cap space? Roy? Carrier?

2 - Ehhh I would not go that far. These wins have been more "gut it out, want it more, capitalize better, game state, goaltending" wins than dominant outings.
STLBlues17 liked this.
Feb. 13 at 12:02 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Sam
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,240
Likes: 2,188
Quoting: mokumboi
1 - My first point is, fine, I'm totally with you on the general concept. But that doesn't change the fact that we could ask for something that fits our needs, especially since he's moving in the division.

Also, what player are you eying with such lavish new cap space? Roy? Carrier?

2 - Ehhh I would not go that far. These wins have been more "gut it out, want it more, capitalize better, game state, goaltending" wins than dominant outings.


Just cap-space in general. I want the freedom to pounce if an exciting young player becomes available.
Feb. 13 at 12:06 p.m.
#5
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,266
Likes: 11,347
Quoting: STLBlues17
Just cap-space in general. I want the freedom to pounce if an exciting young player becomes available.


Hmm. So not even a minutes replacer in mind? We'd need someone. Jokiharju?
Feb. 13 at 12:14 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Sam
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,240
Likes: 2,188
Quoting: mokumboi
Hmm. So not even a minutes replacer in mind? We'd need someone. Jokiharju?


Sure, he could make sense. I'm not sure who else is UFA this summer but I'm sure there's someone who is capable enough. I would prefer an offensive leaning guy considering Colt and Kessel are very heavy defense leaning.
Feb. 13 at 12:23 p.m.
#7
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,266
Likes: 11,347
Quoting: STLBlues17
Sure, he could make sense. I'm not sure who else is UFA this summer but I'm sure there's someone who is capable enough. I would prefer an offensive leaning guy considering Colt and Kessel are very heavy defense leaning.


Is Kessel really defensive leaning? Or is it just that he doesn't have any offense for this level? Lots of people act like he's been a revelation, but he does make some bad mistakes in our zone. It's not like he's been anything resembling flawless or outstanding. He's been okay as a temporary fill-in. Not as a replacement by any stretch. We'd absolutely need a capable 2RD who's a reliable + in our zone.
Feb. 13 at 12:27 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Sam
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,240
Likes: 2,188
Quoting: mokumboi
Is Kessel really defensive leaning? Or is it just that he doesn't have any offense for this level? Lots of people act like he's been a revelation, but he does make some bad mistakes in our zone. It's not like he's been anything resembling flawless or outstanding. He's been okay as a temporary fill-in. Not as a replacement by any stretch. We'd absolutely need a capable 2RD who's a reliable + in our zone.


Yeah I'd say he has been quite good defensively, especially given he is playing with Krug. I prefer a guy who makes mistakes at this age though because he will learn quickly what he can and can't get away with.
Feb. 13 at 2:13 p.m.
#9
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,266
Likes: 11,347
Quoting: STLBlues17
Yeah I'd say he has been quite good defensively, especially given he is playing with Krug. I prefer a guy who makes mistakes at this age though because he will learn quickly what he can and can't get away with.


He's been okay. Do no harm, at best. And much better when he was on the 3rd pairing than when he is on the 2nd. I think it's more fair to say that Krug has calmed his little ass down with Faulk out of there, acting more responsibly to simplify things for Kessel.
Feb. 13 at 2:30 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Sam
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,240
Likes: 2,188
Quoting: mokumboi
He's been okay. Do no harm, at best. And much better when he was on the 3rd pairing than when he is on the 2nd. I think it's more fair to say that Krug has calmed his little ass down with Faulk out of there, acting more responsibly to simplify things for Kessel.


I think Faulk is also extremely weak defensively and Kessel being OKAY has made a difference.
Feb. 13 at 2:41 p.m.
#11
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,266
Likes: 11,347
Edited Feb. 13 at 2:52 p.m.
Quoting: STLBlues17
I think Faulk is also extremely weak defensively and Kessel being OKAY has made a difference.


Most of Faulk's problems this season are a matter of puck handling. He still lifts a lot of defensive weight, even with his recent mistakes. Besides, Faulk has not been fully fit for a couple months now. Hopefully, this shutdown will let him heal up right.

Edit: Oh hell, Pesce will also be a UFA. Forgot him.
Feb. 13 at 3:05 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Sam
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,240
Likes: 2,188
Quoting: mokumboi
Most of Faulk's problems this season are a matter of puck handling. He still lifts a lot of defensive weight, even with his recent mistakes. Besides, Faulk has not been fully fit for a couple months now. Hopefully, this shutdown will let him heal up right.

Edit: Oh hell, Pesce will also be a UFA. Forgot him.


Hopefully, but he bled chances and goals really bad last year too
Feb. 13 at 3:12 p.m.
#13
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,266
Likes: 11,347
Quoting: STLBlues17
Hopefully, but he bled chances and goals really bad last year too


"He bled" chances/goals? Or chances/goals were bled while he was on the ice with others making the mistakes? These are not the same thing. Krug was scandalously bad in our zone last season. Horrifically bad. Can't remember exactly where, but he was top 10 or even top 5 in D zone giveaways.
Feb. 13 at 3:17 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Sam
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,240
Likes: 2,188
Quoting: mokumboi
"He bled" chances/goals? Or chances/goals were bled while he was on the ice with others making the mistakes? These are not the same thing. Krug was scandalously bad in our zone last season. Horrifically bad. Can't remember exactly where, but he was top 10 or even top 5 in D zone giveaways.


Yes they were/are both very poor defensive players and the combination of them together has yielded awful results.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll