SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Keep it simple

Created by: Rags21
Team: 2023-24 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 16, 2024
Published: Feb. 16, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Acquire RW1 and 3C. Extra picks for depth
Trades
1.
NSH
  1. 2024 1st round pick (NYR)
  2. 2024 6th round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
Maybe low end prospect too
2.
NYR
  1. Smith, Reilly ($2,500,000 retained)
PIT
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (NYR)
  2. 2025 5th round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
Or go after Eberle
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2025
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2026
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$80,062,416$610,892$582,500$3,437,584
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,325,000$2,325,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,641,667$3,641,667
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$762,500$762,500
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,872,000$3,872,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,666,667$5,666,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$100,000$100K)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$825,000$825,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New York Rangers
$812,500$812,500
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,437,500$4,437,500
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RW
NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 16 at 10:29 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 5,427
Likes: 3,450
I’d take a first for Novak but apparently your GM doesn’t want to move his 2024 first cause he wants to be apart of the draft in the Sphere
Feb. 16 at 10:33 a.m.
#2
lgr
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 31
Likes: 3
Have you watched the games recently? That third line (50-22-24) has been incredible. No point in sending away the first for a bottom six that is not suffering whatsoever.

The Smith deal is okay. I personally would like Duclair.

Point being - we can do well this deadline without parting ways with our premier assets (Kakko, the 1st, Othmann, Sykora, Gabe, etc.).

Make a move for the 1RW and perhaps a depth forward.
Feb. 16 at 10:37 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 5,363
Likes: 2,352
Quoting: Ennis
I’d take a first for Novak but apparently your GM doesn’t want to move his 2024 first cause he wants to be apart of the draft in the Sphere


That claim by Dreger was false. Larry brooks disputed it and said they won’t spend a 1st on a guy who they don’t think is worth it
Feb. 16 at 10:39 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 5,363
Likes: 2,352
Quoting: nyr_buck
Have you watched the games recently? That third line (50-22-24) has been incredible. No point in sending away the first for a bottom six that is not suffering whatsoever.

The Smith deal is okay. I personally would like Duclair.

Point being - we can do well this deadline without parting ways with our premier assets (Kakko, the 1st, Othmann, Sykora, Gabe, etc.).

Make a move for the 1RW and perhaps a depth forward.


Brodzinski isn’t gonna be your 3C next year lol you have to plan on Chytil being done for his career and if they could sign Novak to a $3m 3 year deal that would be great

Also brodzinski would strengthen the 4th line and cuylle/Kakko have shown they can play with and carry anyone

I’m not high on Duclair. He isn’t good and Smith is a known playoff performer
Feb. 16 at 11:11 a.m.
#5
aecliptic
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 1,284
Quoting: nyr_buck
Have you watched the games recently? That third line (50-22-24) has been incredible. No point in sending away the first for a bottom six that is not suffering whatsoever.

The Smith deal is okay. I personally would like Duclair.

Point being - we can do well this deadline without parting ways with our premier assets (Kakko, the 1st, Othmann, Sykora, Gabe, etc.).

Make a move for the 1RW and perhaps a depth forward.


I understand that line is playing well now, but what happens a month from now? Is Brodz the long term answer there? No way.
Feb. 16 at 11:15 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 5,363
Likes: 2,352
Quoting: aecliptic
I understand that line is playing well now, but what happens a month from now? Is Brodz the long term answer there? No way.


If anything Cuylle/Kakko carry other players very well. Plus brodzinski helps the 4th line and you get a possible 3C in Novak next year if Chytil is done for
Feb. 16 at 11:18 a.m.
#7
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,114
Likes: 1,389
Unless they are rebuilding, Dubas isn't retaining that much on Smith. Remove the retention and reduce the return by a lot.
Feb. 16 at 11:20 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 5,363
Likes: 2,352
Quoting: jfkst1
Unless they are rebuilding, Dubas isn't retaining that much on Smith. Remove the retention and reduce the return by a lot.


Then I’d go for Eberle. No room for Smith at full cap
jfkst1 liked this.
Feb. 16 at 11:25 a.m.
#9
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,114
Likes: 1,389
Quoting: Rags21
Then I’d go for Eberle. No room for Smith at full cap


I understand. Just can't see a justification from PIT's perspective. Maybe a swap with Goodrow, but again, that would require Dubas rebuilding.
Rags21 liked this.
Feb. 16 at 12:08 p.m.
#10
Hockey IQ
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 1,495
Quoting: jfkst1
Unless they are rebuilding, Dubas isn't retaining that much on Smith. Remove the retention and reduce the return by a lot.


It PIT is retaining for this year and next, id counter with a 2nd and a 3rd or a prospect
Feb. 16 at 12:54 p.m.
#11
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,114
Likes: 1,389
Quoting: Pens3lieve
It PIT is retaining for this year and next, id counter with a 2nd and a 3rd or a prospect


I don't think Smith in general is worth retaining on. And if they were retaining that much dead money, they would only do so in a full rebuild. In which case they need to be justifying it with a better return which isn't likely to be Smith in the first place because there are much more valuable players to move on retention.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll