SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

REALISTIC Saros trade w Buffalo

Created by: AntiAnalytics
Team: 2023-24 Nashville Predators
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 23, 2024
Published: Feb. 23, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
NSH
  1. Krebs, Peyton
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (BUF)
BUF
    Preds are NOT getting more than this for a goalie having a bad season- goalies don’t get great returns to begin with
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the BUF
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the DAL
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the DAL
    2025
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the NSH
    2026
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the NSH
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    24$83,500,000$76,306,699$0$552,500$7,193,301
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $8,500,000$8,500,000
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    C
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $850,000$850,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $3,185,000$3,185,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $2,857,143$2,857,143
    C, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $797,500$797,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
    RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $1,700,000$1,700,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    C, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $775,000$775,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $775,000$775,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $800,000$800,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $775,000$775,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $789,167$789,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $775,000$775,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $9,059,000$9,059,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $6,750,000$6,750,000
    LD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    RD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Feb. 23 at 4:52 p.m.
    #51
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    Quoting: mv21227
    We’ve been clear that this has been a down season for Saros. But one down season doesn’t mean he’s not elite anymore.

    For example, since you’re a Buffalo fan I’ll use their players, do the down seasons Thompson and Cozens are having mean their values have crashed to a 2nd round pick and a 4th line player, and that they’ll never bounce back to what they did last season?


    No, but it does mean their value has most likely DROPPED,
    just like Saros has

    And Saros having a “down year” does- IN FACT- mean that he literally isn’t playing at an “elite” level
    It’s possible he gets back to an elite level,
    but YOUR OWN WORDS ADMIT that he isn’t currently “elite”

    Just bc u THINK he will bounce back,
    it doesn’t mean he will
    All we know is how he’s playing now,
    and it’s NOT “elite”

    Wow dude
    Words matter
    Feb. 23 at 7:40 p.m.
    #52
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 2,150
    Likes: 287
    Quoting: mv21227
    Except he’s actually 31st out of 87 goalies in GSAx this season, and among goalies with 25+ GP he’s ahead of Thompson, Merzlikins, Georgiev, Kuemper, Kochetkov, Hart, Dostal, Oettinger, Vasilevskiy, Fleury, Vejmelka, Wedgewood, Samsonov, Gustavsson, Vanecek, and Korpisalo


    Quoting: AntiAnalytics
    And he’s BEHIND how many?
    Oh yeah, THIRTY

    Hmmmmmmm….?


    I said "starting goalies" there aren't 87 starting goalies.

    And even if we are going by all goalies the 31st placed goalie would be the second worst starter.

    You can manipulate your numbers as much as you want. The facts keep proving you wrong.
    AntiAnalytics liked this.
    Feb. 23 at 7:43 p.m.
    #53
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    Quoting: fangm
    I said "starting goalies" there aren't 87 starting goalies.

    And even if we are going by all goalies the 31st placed goalie would be the second worst starter.

    You can manipulate your numbers as much as you want. The facts keep proving you wrong.


    But moving the goalposts is the only way to remotely make any sense at all of his narrative 🤣🤣🤣
    Feb. 23 at 7:57 p.m.
    #54
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 10,446
    Likes: 9,568
    Quoting: fangm
    I said "starting goalies" there aren't 87 starting goalies.

    And even if we are going by all goalies the 31st placed goalie would be the second worst starter.

    You can manipulate your numbers as much as you want. The facts keep proving you wrong.


    You said the only starters he has more GSAx than we’re Korpisalo, Gustavsson, Vanecek, and Samsonov. Yet the facts prove that he’s also ahead of Merzlikins, Oettinger, Vasilevskiy, Hart, and Kuemper as well. Not to mention numerous other goalies who have played 25+ games. So you were proven wrong by facts
    Feb. 23 at 7:58 p.m.
    #55
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 2,150
    Likes: 287
    Quoting: mv21227
    You said the only starters he has more GSAx than we’re Korpisalo, Gustavsson, Vanecek, and Samsonov. Yet the facts prove that he’s also ahead of Merzlikins, Oettinger, Vasilevskiy, Hart, and Kuemper as well. Not to mention numerous other goalies who have played 25+ games. So you were proven wrong by facts


    Those goalies aren't considered "starters" cause they haven't played enough. Either due to injury or being in jail.
    Feb. 23 at 8:06 p.m.
    #56
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    Quoting: mv21227
    You said the only starters he has more GSAx than we’re Korpisalo, Gustavsson, Vanecek, and Samsonov. Yet the facts prove that he’s also ahead of Merzlikins, Oettinger, Vasilevskiy, Hart, and Kuemper as well. Not to mention numerous other goalies who have played 25+ games. So you were proven wrong by facts


    The FACT is that it’s LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE to have 87 starting goalies for 32 teams
    Holy hell dude

    You’re digging yourself a pit you’ll never get out of

    25+ games played doesn’t make you a “starter”
    That’s just an arbitrary number you’re using
    The “starting” goalie is simply the goalie who plays the most
    There are 32 starting goalies
    If u wanna stretch the meaning of “starting” then u could try to argue some teams have co-starters who essentially split time- but there aren’t 87 of them
    Feb. 23 at 8:09 p.m.
    #57
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 10,446
    Likes: 9,568
    Quoting: fangm
    Those goalies aren't considered "starters" cause they haven't played enough. Either due to injury or being in jail.


    So by your logic are there only 15 starting goalies in the league? Because Oettinger is 16th in games played among goalies. Vasilevskiy is 21st
    Feb. 23 at 8:10 p.m.
    #58
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 10,446
    Likes: 9,568
    Quoting: AntiAnalytics
    The FACT is that it’s LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE to have 87 starting goalies for 32 teams
    Holy hell dude

    You’re digging yourself a pit you’ll never get out of

    25+ games played doesn’t make you a “starter”
    That’s just an arbitrary number you’re using
    The “starting” goalie is simply the goalie who plays the most
    There are 32 starting goalies
    If u wanna stretch the meaning of “starting” then u could try to argue some teams have co-starters who essentially split time- but there aren’t 87 of them


    Show me where I said there are 87 starting goalies in the league? I said out of the 87 total goalies. Then I showed the goalies that have played 25+ games (a reasonable workload to compare with) that he’s ahead of
    Feb. 23 at 8:13 p.m.
    #59
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    Quoting: mv21227
    Show me where I said there are 87 starting goalies in the league? I said out of the 87 total goalies. Then I showed the goalies that have played 25+ games (a reasonable workload to compare with) that he’s ahead of


    What is the point of comparing Saros to the backups of the league when trying to say how good he is???
    Makes no sense

    If u wanna try & say he’s elite, he needs to be compared to the best- NOT the average & mediocre
    Feb. 23 at 8:20 p.m.
    #60
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 10,446
    Likes: 9,568
    Quoting: AntiAnalytics
    What is the point of comparing Saros to the backups of the league when trying to say how good he is???
    Makes no sense

    If u wanna try & say he’s elite, he needs to be compared to the best- NOT the average & mediocre


    So clearly you either can’t read or totally ignored the part where I compared him to goalies who have played minimum 25 games up to full time starters.

    And do you not think Sorokin, Shesterkin, Vasilevskiy, or Oettinger are elite either? Sorokin has only been slightly better than Saros, Shesterkin has been very similar, while Oettinger and Vasilevskiy have both been worse than Saros this year
    Feb. 23 at 8:27 p.m.
    #61
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    Quoting: mv21227
    So clearly you either can’t read or totally ignored the part where I compared him to goalies who have played minimum 25 games up to full time starters.

    And do you not think Sorokin, Shesterkin, Vasilevskiy, or Oettinger are elite either? Sorokin has only been slightly better than Saros, Shesterkin has been very similar, while Oettinger and Vasilevskiy have both been worse than Saros this year


    Bc someone has been elite in their PAST, that doesn’t mean they’ll stay elite in their future- or even are STILL in the present

    And comparing Saros to a widened base to make him look better is a desperate tactic from the defeated side of a debate
    Nice try though (not really)
    Feb. 23 at 8:31 p.m.
    #62
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 10,446
    Likes: 9,568
    Quoting: AntiAnalytics
    Bc someone has been elite in their PAST, that doesn’t mean they’ll stay elite in their future- or even are STILL in the present

    And comparing Saros to a widened base to make him look better is a desperate tactic from the defeated side of a debate
    Nice try though (not really)


    I’m just asking since you clearly think Saros isn’t good anymore if you have the same opinion about those goalies. Because they’re playing at a similar or worse level than Saros is. But you seem too scared to answer it because you’ll be exposed as a hypocrite. Or you actually think guys like UPL, Daccord, Ingram, and Mrazek are better than those goalies which would show a severe lack of hockey knowledge on your end
    Feb. 23 at 8:42 p.m.
    #63
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    Quoting: mv21227
    I’m just asking since you clearly think Saros isn’t good anymore if you have the same opinion about those goalies. Because they’re playing at a similar or worse level than Saros is. But you seem too scared to answer it because you’ll be exposed as a hypocrite. Or you actually think guys like UPL, Daccord, Ingram, and Mrazek are better than those goalies which would show a severe lack of hockey knowledge on your end


    I’m not afraid, it’s just a nonsense way to frame the argument
    The problem is that u seem to be defining how good a player is by their body of work
    While I’m more concerned with how they’re currently playing

    It doesn’t mean UPL will continue to play better,
    but it does mean he is CURRENTLY playing better
    It’s not that complicated

    I can’t predict the future like u though
    I’ll go by what i can see currently and what i can reasonably project based on how players have been trending,
    not how they played 2 or 3 or 5 years ago


    Your thinking has gone the way of the dinosaur
    But good luck with it
    Feb. 23 at 9:10 p.m.
    #64
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 2,150
    Likes: 287
    Quoting: mv21227
    I’m just asking since you clearly think Saros isn’t good anymore if you have the same opinion about those goalies. Because they’re playing at a similar or worse level than Saros is. But you seem too scared to answer it because you’ll be exposed as a hypocrite. Or you actually think guys like UPL, Daccord, Ingram, and Mrazek are better than those goalies which would show a severe lack of hockey knowledge on your end


    Dude you are just as irrational as every other Canucks fan.
    Feb. 23 at 9:15 p.m.
    #65
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 10,446
    Likes: 9,568
    Quoting: fangm
    Dude you are just as irrational as every other Canucks fan.


    You’ve been proven on this site to be more irrational than every other Leafs fan. Even more so if you really think Saros has been a bottom 5 goalie this season
    Feb. 23 at 9:18 p.m.
    #66
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    Quoting: mv21227
    You’ve been proven on this site to be more irrational than every other Leafs fan. Even more so if you really think Saros has been a bottom 5 goalie this season


    We get it….
    Saros is better than the 30 something backups in the league
    Congrats on proving the obvious

    And at the risk of stating the obvious once again…
    who freaking cares if Saros is better than backups???
    That doesn’t prove he’s STILL good

    U can move the goalposts from side to side all u want,
    but it does t get u closer to the end zone
    Feb. 23 at 9:25 p.m.
    #67
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    Quoting: nativewulf
    I don't have to guess. GUESS who votes on the Vezina trophy? 32 NHL GMs. And Saros was 4th last year. So even in a down year I doubt their opinion of him has fallen that much.

    I've given you truth. You just don't want to admit that both of our opinions have merit.


    Lol
    Masquerading your OPINION as the “truth” eliminates any MERIT to your arguments
    Sorry
    Feb. 23 at 9:28 p.m.
    #68
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    Edited Feb. 23 at 10:14 p.m.
    Quoting: nativewulf
    This isn’t about his trade value for me. I could care less what a team is willing to trade for him. This is about him being a top 6 goalie in the league. I won’t deny he’s having a down year, but he is viewed around the league as at least a top 10 goalie. Not analytically this year I’ll admit that. But positionally I’d struggle to find 6 or 10 guys better than Juuse Saros, that I’d rather have going into next season


    And trying to frame this debate around what YOU would personally have going into next year also removes any sort of merit at all from your points
    Just stop
    Feb. 23 at 9:42 p.m.
    #69
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2020
    Posts: 333
    Likes: 216
    Quoting: AntiAnalytics
    And trying to frame this debate around what YOU would personally have going into next year also removes any sort of merit at all from your points
    Just go away


    Alright bud have a good night
    Feb. 23 at 9:53 p.m.
    #70
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 2,150
    Likes: 287
    Quoting: mv21227
    You’ve been proven on this site to be more irrational than every other Leafs fan. Even more so if you really think Saros has been a bottom 5 goalie this season


    Fans of all teams are calling you out for being an idiot lol.

    Like not even for failing to understand hockey but for failing to understand basic middle school logical reasoning.
    AntiAnalytics liked this.
    Feb. 23 at 10:11 p.m.
    #71
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    Quoting: fangm
    Fans of all teams are calling you out for being an idiot lol.

    Like not even for failing to understand hockey but for failing to understand basic middle school logical reasoning.


    But Saros is better than backup goalies !!!
    🤣🤣🤣
    Feb. 23 at 10:19 p.m.
    #72
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 2,150
    Likes: 287
    Quoting: AntiAnalytics
    But Saros is better than backup goalies !!!
    🤣🤣🤣


    Maybe if he likes Saros so much the Canucks can trade Demko to Toronto for two 1sts and they can spend 10 1sts or whatever he wants on Saros.
    Feb. 23 at 10:38 p.m.
    #73
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    Quoting: fangm
    Maybe if he likes Saros so much the Canucks can trade Demko to Toronto for two 1sts and they can spend 10 1sts or whatever he wants on Saros.


    Wow…. U really think Saros is worth ONLY ten 1sts???
    Pssh! That’s a low ball offer if i ever heard one 🤣🤣🤣
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll