ROUND 1 | TEAM | ORIGINAL | PLAYER | DETAILS |
---|
1 | - | The obvious selection. High ceiling, top line center | ||
2 | - | Easily the second best player. Elite shooting from the wing. | ||
3 | - | Lots of options on D, but I think Levshunov is the best available. Great offensive upside | ||
4 | - | Very strong, capable Power forward who can drive around or through defenders | ||
5 | - | Habs have no need for a defencemen, so Catton is the best forward available. Great passer who would slot in excellently behind or ahead of Suzuki. | ||
6 | - | High upside RHD with an insane offensive ceiling. | ||
7 | - | Simple best player available. Strong 2-way game with the ability to control the game with long stretch passes | ||
8 | - | Very safe pick. Not the highest potential but a surefire bet to be at least a top-6 option | ||
9 | - | Strong skater with a good shot from distance. Unrivaled production from an NCAA defenceman. | ||
10 | - | Long reach with strong rush defence. Can chip in offensively. | ||
11 | - | Longer reach, but weaker allround. Has a higher ceiling but a lower floor. | ||
12 | - | The second coming of Iggy can easily turn into a strong 2nd liner with a little seasoning. | ||
13 | - | Washington loves their Boom or Bust picks; (Miro and Cristall) Eiserman is very high risk but his ceiling is near unrivaled in the class. | ||
14 | - | Nygard impressed at the WJC for a weak Norwegian team. Top 6 upside | ||
15 | Productive in the OHL, smart player with an easily translatable skill set. | |||
16 | - | |||
17 | - | |||
18 | - | |||
19 | - | |||
20 | - | |||
21 | ||||
22 | - | |||
23 | - | |||
24 | ||||
25 | ||||
26 | ||||
27 | - | |||
28 | ||||
29 | - | |||
30 | ||||
31 | - | |||
32 | - |