SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Beauterham

Member Since
Jun. 27, 2018
Favourite Team
St. Louis Blues
Forum Posts
120
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 22 at 3:41 p.m.
Thread: My preferred roster
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>cooperr</b></div><div>Im so lost on this concept. Mitch Marner would be the leading scorer on the Blues pretty easily. The Blues didnt make the playoffs and didnt even average 3 goals a game. Not to mention the Blues have some great goal scorers on the team (Kyrou, Neighbours, &amp; Buchnevich) that could use a guy to pass them the puck. They also have Leddy, Faulk, &amp; Krug who play a ton of minutes. if I was a Blues fan I would want that Parayko contract off the books. He will legit be making $6.5 until he is damn near 40.

As a Leafs fan, I dont even want Parayko. Hes a great player but that contract is way too long.</div></div>

He turns 37 at the end of the season his contract runs out I hardly call that 'damn near 40'. Parayko is the Blues best defenseman by a mile and will still be for several years. You might not value him a lot, but Blues fans absolutely do and it will require an overpay for us to even consider to move him. Doesn't mean I don't like Marner, it's just that this trade doesn't make any sense for the Blues.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 14 at 5:32 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 11 at 11:57 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 3:02 p.m.
Thread: Based on Fans of Other Teams
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>You said St Louis, do you speak for the team/fanbase? That’s literally all I’m saying it’s ur opinion that St. Louis doesn’t do this not the teams opinion. GM’s say one thing then do another all of the time it’s called working the media</div></div>

Sigh...

Ok, If you're dead set on twisting my words, let me rephrase it in that case if it makes you happy. St.Louis Blues General Manager Doug Armstrong stated he isn't interested in deals like this in his his post season press conference. So it is to be expected that the St.Louis Blues (the team, not the fans and definitely not me) aren't interested in a trade as mentioned not only in this tradetopic, but also the other one you were refering to. Can he change his mind? Sure... Is it to be expected? Probably not.

Having said that. You do you, but I don't feel like playing these kind of childish games so I'm done responding to you. Have fun!
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 2:02 p.m.
Thread: Based on Fans of Other Teams
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>Yeah you can have ur own opinion but u can’t say Blues don’t want this and speak for the whole fanbase lol. You can’t say u can have ur own opinion but then say another Blues fan’s opinion is wrong lol</div></div>

Can anyone here speak for an entire fanbase? Can you?

I never mentioned I was talking for a fanbase or whoever, you're the one who's making that up. I merely said, and I quote: "Yeah, St.Louis isn't interested in a deal like this. The Sanheim to STL-deal died when Krug refused to waive his NTC". Can you point to me where I was talking for the fanbase in that sentence? I'm merely stating facts. Again Doug Armstrong specifically mentioned he wasn't interested in moving 1st round picks this time in the retool in his post season press conference (the trade offer included our 24 1st). If you don't believe me, check the piece about his press conference in the Athletic from last week. And yes, it's also my personal opinion this would be a bad trade for the Blues due to our timeline.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 1:37 p.m.
Thread: Based on Fans of Other Teams
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>This trade is based on a trade a St Louis fan made literally an hour ago that multiple St Louis fans on here liked so I’m not sure that’s so accurate maybe in ur opinion it is but doesn’t sound like others agree with you</div></div>

There was literally just one Blues fan in that topic who was happy with the trade (was the first post) and even then it wasn't clear if he was talking specifically about the Sanheim trade (could be) or one of the other proposal deals. The other people that liked the deal aren't Blues fans or were refering to other deals.

But even if there are multiple Blues fans (as you stated) claiming otherwise, thankfully we're all allowed our own opinion and my opinion is that this would be a bad trade for the Blues. At least, at this time during the retool. It would also contradict what Doug Armstrong said last week where he specifically said he wasn't interested in moving 1st round picks and prospects for established players to add to our current core. He did say he hoped to find some good players and do some trades to try to stay competitive, so I guess a player for player trade is possible (potentially with none 1st round picks or top prospects added).