SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

DirtyDanglesTroll

Hockey Expert
Member Since
Jun. 17, 2016
Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
2nd Favourite Team
Vancouver Canucks
Forum Posts
30
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 2, 2016 at 1:18 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 2, 2016 at 1:12 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 31, 2016 at 6:20 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DirtyDangles</b></div><div><i>You are giving up Lindholm a great 2 way Dman for a rover who can't play D. You also think that a guy who gets 0.5 PPG in the AHL can play on the top line in the NHL. Tanguay is old and slow. You have zero secondary scoring. This team is awful</i></div></div>

Pretty sure Karlsson can play D, maybe watch a few Sens games and you'll see. Karlsson has 385 points in 479 nhl games... 82 points last season to put him 5th in league scoring. Elite is an understatement. This guy is an absolute game changer, no other team has a guy like this on their back end. So yes giving up a solid young D in Lindholm, a decent player in Rackell (You don't know what he will be yet - not elite, maybe 2nd 3rd line role. Stats inflated from playing with Getzlaf/Perry) and 2 1st round picks (likely high first round picks) is absolutely worth giving up.

Also you don't think Kerdiles and his 0.5 PPG in the AHL can play top line minutes? Fair enough but you gotta thionk for a young kid to slide in on line with Getzlaf/Perry it might be a little easier transitioning to the NHL. this is all hypothetical as well. Just something fun I came up with. Maybe he has a great camp and they feel he can slot in, how do you know that it would never happen?

Also Tanguay can still play, and is worth 1 Mill. He's a guy that can slide up and down the lineup. His 35pts in 70 games last season says he can. I'd take a flyer on him for 1 mill as a depth guy.

Good thing this is for fun and imagination. You know what wouldn't be fun... being a flyers fan, LOL!
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 24, 2016 at 12:55 p.m.