SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

FutureBruin63

Future Bruin 63
Member Since
Aug. 17, 2016
Favourite Team
Boston Bruins
Forum Posts
48
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 26, 2018 at 2:25 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 25, 2018 at 2:05 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 25, 2018 at 1:56 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 23, 2018 at 7:27 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 20, 2018 at 1:45 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 14, 2018 at 3:38 p.m.
Thread: Da Nuge?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>i don’t think EDM wants to pay their C3 7.25 a year. If they would and Krug is going i’d want Klefbom back. Which probably means adding Heinen to the deal which i don’t like.

Would not mind replacing Krejci with RNH at C2. I just think it would require a seperate deal with another team to take Krejci, a 3 way, or they’d want us to take Looch or Sekera. No matter how it went down, not sure you’d be happy with the end results.</div></div>

Yeah that's fair, I would like Klefbom back also but I dont wanna lose a guy like Heinen, which is why I left him out. I think we could muster up a 3 way deal that would be advantageous to us, but right now I have no clue what that could be. I would have to gauge the interest in Krejci around the league first. It would be our best option though, because there's no way we could afford to take on Lucic or Sekera's contract
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 13, 2018 at 5:33 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 12, 2018 at 6:28 p.m.
Thread: Would this help?
I'm not sure the Sens would want Krejci, a 32 year old centre, considering their current position. They would be even less eager to swap him for a 27 year old centre who is still in his prime. Furthermore, Krejci has a no movement clause on his contract and I seriously doubt he would waive it to go to Ottawa right now. I like the idea of getting Duchene, but it wouldn't happen in this deal. Take out Krejci and add in prospects or young NHLers and maybe it would fly, but otherwise no.

Also, Duchene isn't exactly a player we need as of now. We have a bit of a logjam at centre, so if we were to get him he would most likely end up being a winger. The better options for us right now would be to trade for a winger, like Skinner perhaps, instead of trading for a centre and playing him out of his natural position.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 10, 2018 at 6:48 p.m.
Thread: Patches?
Even though the price wont be very high, itll probably be higher than that.

Patches is a legitimate 35+ goal man, and regardless of the comments by the Canadiens he will command a decent return. Probably gonna have to give up a higher upside prospect and a 1st or 2nd rounder, especially if youre including McQuaid.

On top of all that, Boston is a division rival. As unwise as Bergevin is, he knows enough to either avoid trading a player of Pacioretty's caliber to a rival, or ask for a lot in return for him.

Dont get me wrong, I think Patches would fill our need of a scoring winger, and I'd love to get him, but I just dont see it happening in that deal. Either we overpay to get him now or take our chances in free agency next year. With other wingers like Skinner available now, I'd rather sit out on Pacioretty until the summer.
Forum: Boston BruinsJul. 9, 2018 at 6:02 p.m.
Thread: 2018 Boston Bruins Offseason Thread
Thoughts on trading for a winger this offseason? Panarin and Skinner are the 2 obvious choices, and personally I would rather Skinner.

Obviously Panarin is the more talented player, but it would cost us much more to get him. Asking price from CBJ would most likely be a high end prospect, roster player and a 1st, and that just seems like too much for a player who may not even resign with us at the end of the season. The goal would be to make a trade for a high end winger in order to compete with Tampa and Toronto, while at the same time keeping our window open for as long as possible. By trading for Panarin I think we would be sacrificing too much of our future, when we could give up less for Skinner and still get a very skilled winger to play alongside Krejci and DeBrusk. Asking price for Skinner is reportedly a 1st and a prospect, and we could negotiate a bit, maybe add a 2nd to the deal and end up giving up a less valuable prospect. Overall it just seems like trading for Skinner makes much more sense for us at this point, rather than cleaning house and getting Panarin.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 9, 2018 at 5:48 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 9, 2018 at 3:12 p.m.