DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
7
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Go_Canucks_Go69
Canucks for the cup
Member Since
Jan. 28, 2022
Favourite Team
Vancouver Canucks
Forum Posts
170
Posts per Day
0.2
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 7:34 a.m.
Thread:
Caps
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Logicalicesports</b></div><div>He doesn't want to be traded. He came out and said that after the playoff loss. Personally if he wanted to go to a different team for his final years (if the package were in the Caps favor) I would do it for him. But he literally just said he wants to finish his NHL career with the Capitals and then play a season in Russia for the Dynamo.
Additionally, keeping our firsts and seconds is not tanking. Selling the guys over 25 and getting futures is tanking so you are not correct with saying the capitals are tanking by being smart with their future options for when Ovi does indeed retire.</div></div>
Im sure he did cause i doubt they're willing to give up building
Leonard looked NHL ready like a Men among Boys in the NCAA
Dowd trade cancelled out Van Riemsdyk trade with a 2nd going out and coming in
WSH would be giving up a 1st in this scenario when WSH would trade down from a 13th OA pick in round 1 for a 17th OA pick in the 3rd round.
So they'd be dropping 2 rounds and 4 picks
WSH in this scenario seems to be Trading down vs trading away.
Dowd can be replaced by Monahan among a plethora of others and you have 7m to play with to do it.
Trevor Van Riemsdyk can also be replaced via free agency but really is being upgraded to Barron.
Barrons NHL numbers were no different then Harris, Struble,Xhekaj or Kovacevic
He went down cause laval needed RD not LD after an injury to Bowey i believe it was?
Harris and Kovacevic wasnt Waiver Exempt
That left Struble, Xhekaj or Barron. Struble's basically David Savard 2.0 so we needed him blocking shots.
Xhekaj was playing good hockey after his return from a slow start after his AHL call up so sending him back down wouldnt work.
Barron went down cause for the first time everyone was healthy on our blue line and he had the most flexibility but would also play the biggest role in AHL filling a need after an injury.
Fans on here maybe gave up on him
But MSL nor Coach Houle seem to be counting Barron out at all.
Personally i'd rather just trade you Mike Matheson for a 1st and Sutter straight up(Sutter's a good AHL leader, i want Bourque replaced)
Give WSH their boost on the back end and the Power Play so if nothing else he helps Ovi become the NHL's All Time Goal Scorer doing it all in WSH
I'd much rather keep Barron who was can build into a Matheson in time rather then just give barron away to trade up 2 rounds
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 1 at 7:31 p.m.
Thread:
Pens
If that first is unprotected I'd do that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 1 at 7:28 p.m.
Thread:
Pens
That's an awfully expensive blue line. I don't think the Penguins are looking to give up top picks for a guy like Chychrun. He's great, don't get me wrong, but if they were to trade away those draft choices at all, it'd be for a much larger fish.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 1 at 7:26 p.m.
Thread:
Flyers
Torts would cut NAK by the end of preseason lol. Even AV didn’t like his penalty taking and AV checked out.
I don’t want to trade a 2nd for a meh defenseman when we have Parekh, Andrae, and Bonk waiting to come up in this scenario.
Flyers don’t need Manson and are weak at C so not trading Poehling.
If a 2023 1st wasn’t good enough to trade Laughton, a 2026 1st definitely isn’t good enough. If we are adding a 3rd it would be their 2024 1st.
Scandella signing is also useless they would just keep Zamula up
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 5:02 p.m.
Thread:
Preds
Tampa Bay might consider that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 4:10 p.m.
Thread:
Devils
Devils would potentially lose out on a lot of value if they did it this way, and there is more than one way to skin a cat. Markstrom as a rental is probably worth a 1st to whomever needs him, either now or at the deadline. A top 10 pick is worth significantly more than Markstrom as a rental and a top 10 pick is worth significantly more than where VANs pick will end up in the 20s. Together I think the value is somewhat close, but you probably keep you top 10 pick and see if there is another way to get it done if youre the devils. E.g. the devils 2025 1st round pick and either a player or prospect for markstrom by himself.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 28 at 11:26 p.m.
Thread:
Canucks
Those picks only cover the cost of moving Mikheyev to Chicago, so basically you want the Hawks to give Kurashev to Vancouver for free.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 28 at 6:02 p.m.
Thread:
Canucks
Hawks easily decline. Take out Kurashev to the Canucks and the Hawks might consider it though. But the cap next season is $87.7m, so Mikheyev still fits on the roster!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 28 at 5:37 p.m.
Thread:
Canucks
Chicago rejects... If Kurashev can keep up his current production into next year, His price tag is going to be steep, especially due to his contract
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 5, 2023 at 3:12 p.m.
Thread:
Big D
THIS IS BRUTAL... TANEV IS WASHED NOT WORTH TIMMINS AND A FIRST AND LEAFS WON'T MOVE TOPI FOR A DUSTER LIKE ANDERSON BRUTAL TRADE WAKE UP.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 30, 2022 at 3:53 p.m.
Thread:
Benning in Boston
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>cMac73</b></div><div>Yeah that first trade is not happening</div></div>
Sure it will. Hire Jim Benning and you too can make an awful trade for OEL!!!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 19, 2022 at 11:06 p.m.
Thread:
Elias Pettersson for Noah Dobson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TML_Tika</b></div><div>This is total insanity for the Canucks........Stand Pat Allvin and Retired Rutherford would be out of a job tomorrow if this trade happened.</div></div>
No it isn't. Pettersson was just drafted in the 3rd round. Dobson is already a top pairing dman
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 23, 2022 at 8:32 p.m.
Thread:
Ghost in the shell
Terrible trade for the Canucks by trading for Gostisbehere and giving away Garland. We don’t need another LD who plays the same role as OEL. We need a RD. Also Garland is a gem, he is a great player not sure why Nucks fans want to give him up. He will bounce back next season under Bruce.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 23, 2022 at 8:46 p.m.
Thread:
Ghost in the shell
Paying a first for Gostibehere???????
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 20, 2022 at 12:37 p.m.
Thread:
holl
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jedihonesy</b></div><div>what do you think Holl is worth?</div></div>
a 4th
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 17, 2022 at 3:48 p.m.
Thread:
NHL 22 Franchise Mode Year 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>xxToothxx</b></div><div>Must have done this team just before nap time.... little fella is very tired. Get some rest Go_Canucks_Go.... you've got alot to learn.</div></div>
I’m pretty sure he did this in a video game where trades are always unrealistic
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 12, 2022 at 7:22 p.m.
Thread:
Vancouver FA 2022-23
Gotta get more back for miller and we already signed Spencer Martin to be the backup we don’t need lindgren
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 12, 2022 at 7:21 p.m.
Thread:
Vancouver FA 2022-23
Kuzmenko is going to be in the top 6, I don't see a real need in Palat, I would rather keep the money to get a better third C and keep caps for next year's signature + why would we sign Linddgren while we have Martin already signed that did the exact same thing this year
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 30, 2022 at 1:48 p.m.
Thread:
Back2Back
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sabresparaavida</b></div><div>Why would the Sabres trade Krebs for a late first a year away?</div></div> <div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wojme</b></div><div>Ya, sabres aren't making that trade</div></div> <div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DirtyDangle</b></div><div>thats not getting krebs...</div></div> <div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TampaBayLightning22</b></div><div>Buffalo passes, On the Krebs trade...</div></div> A possible Sabre line up for next year:
Skinner-Thompson-Tuch
Olofsson - Cozens-Quinn
Asplund - Mittelstadt - Hinostroza
Girgensons - Krebs - Okposo
I do not envision Mittelstadt nor Krebs as a fourth line center, do any of you?
So where do you think Krebs will play next year, move Left handed Olofsson to RW and Krebs to LW?
I suppose that would work well except 5 on 5, Krebs is terrible in his own end and he is known to be a better passer than scorer.
What do you think would be Krebs offensive ceiling?
20 goals, 60 pts?
That would be a dream as only two Sabres exceeded 60 pts last year, 17 goals 45 pts is probably closer.
Over his career Compher averages 17 goals 34 pts for 82 games while being a top PK forward for the Avalanche for the last four years.
Not knowing if Compher would sign beyond next season is <strong>The ONLY reason </strong>I would pass on the trade.
This works for me ONLY if JT had an extension in place before he was traded.
I get a top defensive center who won 51.4% of his face offs last year, who has a Stanley Cup Ring, who has proven he can score in the NHL and I get a first round pick.
OK beat me up and tell me Krebs has a much higher ceiling than JT, and you would be correct, but can Payton PK and score?
Well that is my take on this trade, as IMO Buffalo could use another forward who can play defense and score.
<strong>EDIT:</strong>
Think of this as an extension of the Eichel trade.
Top 6 RW, Tuch
Mid 6 PK center, Compher
<strong>two NHL forwards who are very good</strong>
2022 first round pick 16th OA (at the time of the trade thought it would be 25th or higher)
2023 first round pick
2023 2nd round pick
Three good chances for another NHL player.
That is a return one could only dream of getting for Jack.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 1, 2022 at 9:56 a.m.
Thread:
Back2Back
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gretzkyghosts</b></div><div>A possible Sabre line up for next year:
Skinner-Thompson-Tuch
Olofsson - Cozens-Quinn
Asplund - Mittelstadt - Hinostroza
Girgensons - Krebs - Okposo
I do not envision Mittelstadt nor Krebs as a fourth line center, do any of you?
So where do you think Krebs will play next year, move Left handed Olofsson to RW and Krebs to LW?
I suppose that would work well except 5 on 5, Krebs is terrible in his own end and he is known to be a better passer than scorer.
What do you think would be Krebs offensive ceiling?
20 goals, 60 pts?
That would be a dream as only two Sabres exceeded 60 pts last year, 17 goals 45 pts is probably closer.
Over his career Compher averages 17 goals 34 pts for 82 games while being a top PK forward for the Avalanche for the last four years.
Not knowing if Compher would sign beyond next season is <strong>The ONLY reason </strong>I would pass on the trade.
This works for me ONLY if JT had an extension in place before he was traded.
I get a top defensive center who won 51.4% of his face offs last year, who has a Stanley Cup Ring, who has proven he can score in the NHL and I get a first round pick.
OK beat me up and tell me Krebs has a much higher ceiling than JT, and you would be correct, but can Payton PK and score?
Well that is my take on this trade, as IMO Buffalo could use another forward who can play defense and score.
<strong>EDIT:</strong>
Think of this as an extension of the Eichel trade.
Top 6 RW, Tuch
Mid 6 PK center, Compher
<strong>two NHL forwards who are very good</strong>
2022 first round pick 16th OA (at the time of the trade thought it would be 25th or higher)
2023 first round pick
2023 2nd round pick
Three good chances for another NHL player.
That is a return one could only dream of getting for Jack.</div></div>
I think the Sabres future that KA envisions does not have a traditional forwards group, and is more going to be a roll 3-4 very good lines. Tage, Skinner, and Tuch all belong in the top 6. Oloffson is a solid 2nd line winger. Cozens, mitts, JJP, Quinn, and Krebs should all (or almost all) develop to be capable 2nd line players or better. That’s 9 guys who could play in a top 6 (maybe not now, but in a couple of years.) Then you throw in Rosen, and whoever we draft this year with the 3 firsts/whoever surprises that is currently in prospect pool. There is definitely the potential to run at least 3, if not 4 lines of 2nd line calibre+ players. This team may not end up with elite talent in the forward group, but should have ridiculous depth that will chip away at you. And then there is the star power on defense with Dahlin/Power. If KA wants to run 4 scoring lines, we will need very strong center depth to do that, and getting rid of Krebs would seriously diminish that potential. You’re unlikely to get a prospect of Krebs potential with a likely very late first in 2023, so for both speed and quality of the rebuild, keeping Krebs is the move.
In 2-3 years we could have:
Skinner-Tage-Oloffson (high goal scoring line)
Asplund-Cozens-Tuch (very tough to play against with solid scoring touch)
JJP-Mitts-Quinn (a “3rd” line that would score like a 2nd line)
Rosen-Krebs-? (Oh look another line that can score a decent bit) *? =forward taken 9/16/28/41 OA or someone who steps up like bloom,nadeau, kisakov, or poltapov.
Then the depth keeps coming as this years picks mature/the 3 2nds/our first from next year start to mature.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 1, 2022 at 10:31 a.m.
Thread:
Back2Back
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sabresparaavida</b></div><div>...<strong>going to be a roll 3-4 very good lines. Tage, Skinner, and Tuch all belong in the top 6</strong>...and getting rid of Krebs would seriously diminish that potential... <strong>I cannot disagree more, Compher actually makes this more possible as he is a strong two way player who has already demonstrated the capability to score 17 goals a season. Krebs appears to be a set up forward and not a finisher.</strong></div></div> I agree Buffalo does not have any truly top line players nearly as good as Huberdeau, Tarasenko, Aho, Gaudreau, Matthews, Crosby, Ovechkin, MacKinnon, Kucherov, Panarin or McDavid.
First, it makes sense to roll with four lines.
Second, IMO we will see Granato playing lefties at LW and righting at RW.
Third, I think you actually agree with me as Compher on the fourth line will still average 17 goals/82 games as he has his entire career and he is MUCH better defensively than Krebs.
Skinner Thompson Tuch
Olofsson Cozens Quinn
Asplund Mittelstadt Hinostroza
Girgensons Compher Okposo
Finally, Compher would PK which would be a huge asset.
EDIT, plus Buffalo get another first round pick.
I think you are underestimating Compher and over estimating Krebs.
You of course feel the opposite.
Let's agree to disagree, as I think Buffalo actually gets better with Compher as fourth line center spear heading the PK.
Second edit:
I forgot to add, Adams was floundering and clueless before Karmanos became Associate GM.
Look at who he signed as FA his first year.
Over paid Hall, Eakin over Larsson, passing on Pysyk when the team actually was trying to make the playoffs.
Every one thought Johansson for Staal was a great deal.
Well Staal is out of the NHL but was traded for a 3rd and 5th.
Meanwhile Johansson was recently traded for Sprong, 2022 4th and 2023 6th.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 1, 2022 at 11:40 a.m.
Thread:
Back2Back
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gretzkyghosts</b></div><div>I agree Buffalo does not have any truly top line players nearly as good as Huberdeau, Tarasenko, Aho, Gaudreau, Matthews, Crosby, Ovechkin, MacKinnon, Kucherov, Panarin or McDavid.
First, it makes sense to roll with four lines.
Second, IMO we will see Granato playing lefties at LW and righting at RW.
Third, I think you actually agree with me as Compher on the fourth line will still average 17 goals/82 games as he has his entire career and he is MUCH better defensively than Krebs.
Skinner Thompson Tuch
Olofsson Cozens Quinn
Asplund Mittelstadt Hinostroza
Girgensons Compher Okposo
Finally, Compher would PK which would be a huge asset.
EDIT, plus Buffalo get another first round pick.
I think you are underestimating Compher and over estimating Krebs.
You of course feel the opposite.
Let's agree to disagree, as I think Buffalo actually gets better with Compher as fourth line center spear heading the PK.
Second edit:
I forgot to add, Adams was floundering and clueless before Karmanos became Associate GM.
Look at who he signed as FA his first year.
Over paid Hall, Eakin over Larsson, passing on Pysyk when the team actually was trying to make the playoffs.
Every one thought Johansson for Staal was a great deal.
Well Staal is out of the NHL but was traded for a 3rd and 5th.
Meanwhile Johansson was recently traded for Sprong, 2022 4th and 2023 6th.</div></div>
There are also reports that KA wanted to rebuild starting that year, but Eichel would demand a trade if that was the case, and KA (or the Pegulas) didn’t want to pull that yet.
While Compher might be a better fit next year, in the future, once Krebs develops, and we are more ready to compete, we would wish we still had Krebs. Comphers ceiling is about 40 points, while Krebs is probably in the neighborhood of 60+. It likely won’t happen, but there’s the chance that we could end up with 4 60 point centers centering 4 lines in Krebs, Cozens, Mitts, and Tage. The other benefit of keeping Krebs, is the hedge against Cozens/Mitts staying around the level they are now, injuries, or Tage regressing. If two of them get injured/end up not that good, I would feel a lot better with Krebs at 2C than Compher. I also don’t think we need Compher for the PK. Cozens, Asplund, Girgs, Okposo, and Tuch are all solid on the PK. Girgs and Okposo may be gone after next year, but we will be fine IMO. The biggest problem with the PK currently is the goaltending.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 1, 2022 at 12:23 p.m.
Thread:
Back2Back
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sabresparaavida</b></div><div>There are also reports that KA wanted to rebuild starting that year, but Eichel would demand a trade if that was the case, and KA (or the Pegulas) didn’t want to pull that yet.
While Compher might be a better fit next year, in the future, once Krebs develops, and we are more ready to compete, we would wish we still had Krebs. Comphers ceiling is about 40 points, while Krebs is probably in the <strong>neighborhood of 60+ It likely won’t happen</strong>. but there’s the chance that we could end up with 4 60 point centers centering 4 lines in Krebs, Cozens, Mitts, and Tage. The other benefit of keeping Krebs, is the hedge against Cozens/Mitts staying around the level they are now, injuries, or Tage regressing. If two of them get injured/end up not that good, I would feel a lot better with Krebs at 2C than Compher. I also don’t think we need Compher for the PK. Cozens, Asplund, Girgs, Okposo, and Tuch are all solid on the PK. Girgs and Okposo may be gone after next year, but we will be fine IMO. The biggest problem with the PK currently is the goaltending.</div></div> 75 forwards in the NHL had 60 pts or more last year, 32 teams 3 top line players total 96 top line forwards.
I love your optimism penciling in Krebs on the top line ahead of Cozens, Quinn, Tuch and Mittelstadt presuming Olofsson, Skinner and Thompson are already in that catagory.
You are correct Compher's ceiling is 40 pts/82 I do not see Krebs much higher than that with the current players.
I would be thrilled if Krebs could average 17 goals/82 gms, same as Compher.
The Sabres PK'ed by committee (10 players all PK'ed at least 0:30/gm and no one did more then 1:30/gm) and were not very good at doing it ranking 23rd in the NHL last year.
Let me summarize my POV:
Compher would have to sign a long term contract before the trade.
Compher wins 51.4% of his faceoffs, higher than any Sabre currently on the team (Eakin's 56% was obviously higher).
Compher PK's an area that Buffalo obviously needs improvement.
Krebs is terrible in his own end.
We KNOW Compher can average 17 g/82 gms, Krebs is noted for his passing not for his finishing.
Considering Buffalo has Thompson, Cozens, and Mittelstadt as top 3 centers, I can see how Buffalo would rather have a center who PK's, wins FO, avg 17 goals/82 games.
Compher is actually a better insurance card in case Dylan or Casey cannot cut it, WE KNOW he can do it, we are still hoping Payton can.
Girgensons Compher Okposo would be an imposing shut down line.
Buffalo gets a first as well as JT.
<a href="/users/Go_Canucks_Go69" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Go_Canucks_Go69</a>
I really cannot believe that there is any doubt other than signing Compher to making this trade.
Looking at the big picture and the Eichel trade.
Tuch 19.6 goals/82 games
Compher 17.1 goals/82 games
2022 VGK first round pick.
2023 COL first round pick.
2023 VGK second round pick. Five picks in the first two rounds.
Two top 6 forwards and three chances to get another good player.
How could anyone turn this down?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 27, 2022 at 12:23 p.m.
Thread:
Yotes
Matthews dosent wanna play in an arena that has less seats then an OHL arena lol.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 1, 2022 at 1:26 p.m.
Thread:
Leafs rebuild HEHEHA
I think Jose Bautista would be a nice fit in that last d spot there.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com