SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

TuuksMcGooks

Member Since
Jun. 9, 2016
Favourite Team
Boston Bruins
Forum Posts
43
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 14, 2016 at 10:25 p.m.
Thread: Why I should be Bruins GM 4.0
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsForTheWin</b></div><div><i>I can't believe you made a trade for Hartnell. The guy is overpaid and hes steadily declined since getting that extension. Murray would need to be a #1 dman for that to not be brutal. Also the Wizz is worth less than half of what you offered. He's a 2M type player at this point.</i></div></div>
Hartnell has steadily declined? Take a peak at his stats man. He put up his 3rd consecutive 50 point, 100 PIM season, all while being put in a position to fail by john tortorella. And if wisniewski was a 2million type player, he would have signed by now. Besides, as I said in the previous comment, it's a 1 year deal. Have a clue of what your talking about before you rip apart somebodys proposal
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 8, 2016 at 7:25 p.m.
Thread: 98.5 Dream Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsForTheWin</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>zleach77</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TuuksMcGooks</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsForTheWin</b></div><div><i>I think they are way better than you give them credit for. Sweeny is worse in terms of value gained vs value lost. It's not even an argument, Sweeny is terrible at measureing player value, just like Benning, who both had Chiarelli teach them. As for that trade we rip them off royally. Fowler = Rask. Kesler = Krejci. Gibson &gt; 1st Silfverberg &gt;&gt;&gt; Morrow.</i></div></div>

Rask does not = Cam Fowler, and it's not even close. And krejci is 10x better than the heavily declining ryan kesler. Doesn't matter what trade proposal rask is involved in, we lose unless we're getting an elite starter back in return. Tuuks is going nowhere.</i></div></div>

I agree 100%. That was some dum dum analysis. Rask would be almost impossible to get a fair return on. And have you looked at Fowler's possession numbers? In no way is he equal value to Rask in any sense.</i></div></div> Appearently you guys missed last year. Rask was like goalie #20 in the league and is being paid like #3. Tuukka laid a huge deuce last year and has crap value now. He's not even worth a young top 4 dman, but I was being nice. Maybe you guys totally missed Rask fishing the puck out of the net all year at an astounding rate for a guy whos paid 7M.</i></div></div>
If you had any clue about what's going on with the B's, then you'd realize last year was not on Rask. Look at the team playing in front of him dude. Rask had to bail out his d on multiple occasions every game, there's only so much he could do. He also finished the season with an above average save% (.918) playing behind arguably the worst defence core in the entire league. Any argument behind trading Rask is a stupid one as far as I'm concerned, We'd spend 5-10 years looking for a better or equivalent goalie
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2016 at 6:31 p.m.
Thread: Fire Sweeney, Hire Brekel Part I
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tuukkatimebaby</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div><i>Just wondering who gave me a 1 star ratings for this. Maybe back it up by telling me your reasoning behind it.</i></div></div>

Might have something to do with you splitting up 37 and 63. Also signing strictly 4th liners in the offseason. I'd give a lower than 1 rating if possible</i></div></div>

Brouwer a 4th liner? The Bruins need is defense. They actually don't have a lot of holes in the offense. That's why the bottom 6 was addressed in this mock. I also addressed the defense. And whoa man, i accidentally moved Marchand off Bergeron's wing. Holy smokes!! Call the police, that's a crime. Get real, little troll. You resigned Chris Kelly in your only ACGM on here, I think you shouldn't talk.

You call out anyone who, "keeps the status quo" in their ACGM, yet do the same thing. lolololol</i></div></div>

Brouwer isn't a 4th liner, no, but you're overpaying him massively. You talk about moving on from Chris Kelly, then why on earth would you sign Matt Cullen, especially for TWO MORE YEARS?!! Kelly is a leader in the Bruins locker room, and leadership was something that was missing last season. No coincidence that was the case while Kelly was hurt all season.

Also, how can you say you "addressed the defence" by only bringing in Matt Dumba. You're in over your head if you think bringing in an unporven young dman is going to fix the Bruins defence problems. They are more than one piece away.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 9, 2016 at 7:54 p.m.