DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Wildfan24
Member Since
Apr. 5, 2016
Favourite Team
Minnesota Wild
2nd Favourite Team
New York Islanders
Forum Posts
979
Posts per Day
0.3
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 9:08 p.m.
Thread:
second attempt
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sensonfire</b></div><div>I think you're vastly overestimating my level of interest in trading Brady Tkachuk ...</div></div>
That's nice.
It very likely equals my level of interest in trading Boldy.
So we're even. Sound fair?
However, my prior comment has f***all to do with your's and my level of interest in moving our teams players. Instead, it dealt with one factor, and one factor only. Perceived player values.
You made a asinine comment in regards to what it would cost to acquire Tkachuk. My response was made entirely to disabuse you of that notion, and set the record straight.
You don't want to move Brady? That's fine.
Wanna state that it'd take an overpay to pry him out of Ottawa? Also fine.
But asking for THREE total equivalent 1st round talents in value back for him when one of those pieces involved is one that carries the EXACT SAME LEVEL of value of Brady himself is where I draw the line. Asking for anything more than that, especially two top prospects in this case, is going to get you ripped to shreds. Everytime.
Just saying.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 7:14 p.m.
Thread:
second attempt
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RazWild</b></div><div>Sorry.
But Tkachuk =/= Boldy. That's STRICTLY a 1v1 swap.
There's NO scenario where Brady gets Lambos and/or Rossi ontop of Boldy. Don't be daft.</div></div>
I think you're vastly overestimating my level of interest in trading Brady Tkachuk ...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 6:22 p.m.
Thread:
second attempt
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sensonfire</b></div><div>You have three options:
1. You can have Tkachuk and nothing else for Boldy + Lambos + Rossi.
2. You can have Boston's 1st and nothing else for Rossi.
3. You can stop posting AGMs on Capfriendly where Minnesota gets Tkachuk.
The choice is your's ...</div></div>
Sorry.
But Tkachuk =/= Boldy. That's STRICTLY a 1v1 swap.
There's NO scenario where Brady gets Lambos and/or Rossi ontop of Boldy. Don't be daft.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 5:52 p.m.
Thread:
second attempt
You have three options:
1. You can have Tkachuk and nothing else for Boldy + Lambos + Rossi.
2. You can have Boston's 1st and nothing else for Rossi.
3. You can stop posting AGMs on Capfriendly where Minnesota gets Tkachuk.
The choice is your's ...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 5:31 p.m.
Thread:
second attempt
It seems to me that Tkachuk and Kaprizov at LW (as <a href="/users/RazWild" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@RazWild</a> says) is pretty much a wash with Kaprizov at LW and Boldy at RW (as RazWild says), so I don't see this trade as a good idea for Minnesota at all. You guys already know what you have in Rossi and Lambos, whereas you have no idea what will be available at the Boston pick, and he certainly won't be a significant roster player in 2024-2025 as you already know Marco Rossi will be, never mind prime prospect Carson Lambos.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 5:09 p.m.
Thread:
second attempt
Can we NOT trade for Brady, please.
He's never has been or played a single second of time at RW on his off-hand side for the entirety of his career. He's strictly a LW.
So playing him there is asinine.
Boldy on the other hand IS and always has played RW whenever he wasn't being experimented at center. RW is his NATURAL position.
Furthermore, Boldy is quite literally in the same class of player/tier as Brady, with similar levels of production over the last three years and damn near the same PPG. Brady just hits more. Well good for him. BOLDY COSTS $1.2M LESS, FOR TWO YEARS LONGER.
Even if this were to happen. That's not a trade I'd consider, as it'd strictly be a 1v1, so throwing BOTH Lambos AND Rossi into the deal for a VERY late 1st is questionable at best.
We're much much better off keeping both Boldy and Rossi, and their combined future production, than packaging them in a gross overpay for a player we neither need or should want over what we already have.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 10:31 p.m.
Thread:
bored
No interest in that from the Jackets; both of those guys are doing their jobs ably and well here and we don't want to spend what it would take to get replacements.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 1:48 p.m.
Thread:
bored
Well, this team would leave bruises, but idk how good at hockey it is.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 1:41 p.m.
Thread:
bored
You're gonna have to pay to be rid of Gaudreau's contract and EDM isn't the team that'd ever consider taking him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 1:20 p.m.
Thread:
bored
Minnesota can have Tkachuk for Boldy + Lambos + their 1st.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 1:15 p.m.
Thread:
bored
No, they are not close.
The fact that Ottawa needs to add a 1st on top of Tkachuk is ridiculous.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 1:14 p.m.
Thread:
bored
I'm firmly in the "the Sens simply aren't trading Tkachuk" camp, but if the Staios had a gun to his head and was told to trade him, I wouldn't be mad about that trade being to Minnesota for Boldy+
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 8:53 p.m.
Thread:
not my team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wildfan24</b></div><div>I'd figure that.. But I think that's the only way Edmonton trades there best 2 or top 2 prospects (if I'm correct on this) and first</div></div>
To Anaheim they’re both throw ins
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 22 at 9:51 a.m.
Thread:
nothing to do
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wildfan24</b></div><div>that sounds like you think it's a over payment?? what would your fair offer be?m</div></div>
Boqvist is probably worth a 2nd or 3rd, particularly since it’s known CBJ are trying to move him. I would not give up assets to take on Guds, even with retention.
Its hard to put together an offer when I really don’t think Guds is an asset you would want to take on, even if he is a great locker-room guy who is having a bit of a bounce-back season.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 22 at 10:14 a.m.
Thread:
nothing to do
I would not put Provorov and Merrill on the same team, for one. Take him and at least one second out of the deal. The depth winger is meaningless to the deal, too. The remaining third for Boqvist and the second to pay for that much retention is fine. In fact, I don't know that Columbus agrees to the retention or moving of Gudbranson at all.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 21 at 1:48 p.m.
Thread:
nothing to do
I mean…holy fracking shizz, CBJ take that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 21 at 1:46 p.m.
Thread:
nothing to do
Flower isn’t enough of an upgrade
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 6, 2023 at 1:19 p.m.
Thread:
not my team
Habs replly with "you can keep Janmark"
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 6, 2023 at 1:29 p.m.
Thread:
not my team
Watching Campbell somehow outsuck last seasons suckfest makes me want more than that from a nashville perspective
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 6, 2023 at 1:05 p.m.
Thread:
not my team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wildfan24</b></div><div>What would you like ?</div></div>
Seeler will fetch either a 3rd or 4th without having to take on a cap dump back
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 6, 2023 at 12:19 p.m.
Thread:
not my team
It's the simplest trade, but yes from Columbus. Only hangup is if they want to keep Bean so we have 3 LD; other option is play Peeke or Boqvist (or Gudbranson) on the left.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 6, 2023 at 12:30 p.m.
Thread:
not my team
So the Flyers take ur cap dump and give you Seeler and get nothing in return? Yeah that’s not happening lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 1, 2023 at 5:32 p.m.
Thread:
its fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wildfan24</b></div><div>Besides the ranking of rossi Whats your thoughts on the trade and or value?</div></div>
I’m a big Lindholm fan and your package for him is fair, but I don’t like the timing of this trade. Lindholm is 28 years old and realistically the Wild aren’t anywhere near a legit Cup contender and probably won’t be until he is past his prime.
To make a franchise altering trade like this, I wouldn’t target anyone who is older than Kaprizov…but that’s just me.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 28, 2023 at 4:10 p.m.
Thread:
its fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CJ1909</b></div><div>Lindholm would be amazing and the value is probably what it would take, but I feel the team is better balanced when Ek plays 3C and that line can be the big line (BEEF) with Hartman doing so well at 1C as he doesn't really fit anywhere else, Lindholm/MoJo/Boldy would be a great second line scoring option. Freddy G gets placed as 4C which is probably best for him anyway.</div></div>
No that value is not enough, especially with retention. Yurov or Faber would need to be added. Right now that offer is on par with Hagel
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 28, 2023 at 3:57 p.m.
Thread:
its fun
The juice would not be worth the squeeze on lindholm. Just way too much to give up.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com