DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
gretzkyghosts
Member Since
Apr. 19, 2018
Favourite Team
Buffalo Sabres
2nd Favourite Team
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forum Posts
5352
Posts per Day
2.4
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 3 at 6:06 p.m.
Thread:
Next Year
2nd round pick is a bit too rich for Iafallo
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 3:30 p.m.
Thread:
More serious Marner to NAS
<strong>If</strong> Marner played C, I'm sure a deal could be arranged.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 2:05 p.m.
Thread:
New Look
If thats the best offer the Flames are getting id rather lose him for nothing
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 2:05 p.m.
Thread:
New Look
If the Sabres had any interest in moving Cozens, they wouldn’t have traded Mittelstadt. Moving Cozens would give the Sabres the worst center group in the league unless they signed Lindholm. We’d have Thompson, no 2C, Krebs at 3C (who I don’t like even as a 4C) and no 4C. Maybe Savoie and Ostlund could come in and play, but I view Savoie as a winger in the NHL and I certainly am not putting a rookie in as important of a role as 2C.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 2:02 p.m.
Thread:
New Look
Hearing adams talk, sounds like he expects cozens role to grow, like he's expecting him to be an all situations center, that's gonna be good at multiple things. Not a guy you give up for marner.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 1:58 p.m.
Thread:
New Look
Cozens is absolutely not being traded.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 1:56 p.m.
Thread:
New Look
Both Buffalo and Calgary decline in an instant
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 1:55 p.m.
Thread:
New Look
Cozens is the guy you don’t trade to a division rival
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 1:43 p.m.
Thread:
Marner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockeyfan1986</b></div><div>Montreal refuses.
3 years of 5.5 + 1 year of 4.45 does not make sense to take on Skinner. If Skinner would have 1-2 years left sure. They can send Anderson to the minors at the start of the year to save cap room.</div></div>
I disagree. Habs need scoring. Skinner still has some juice left and honestly getting 2 players off the roster opens up opportunities to let rookies make the team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 1:42 p.m.
Thread:
Marner
Habs accept! Good trade idea!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 12:25 a.m.
Thread:
Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Justafan79</b></div><div>No not at all being tough and durable has nothing to do with playing heavy. You can be durable and play a very finesse game you can be tough and not play a tough heavy game which again was the infected message.</div></div>
I no longer have any idea what youre talking about lol. So ill just simplify. I dont think Florida is a goon team that runs ppl over. They are tough and durable, they are also borderline hit artists and their coach whines alot. That's a very effective combination. I'd like the Sabres to be the same.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 12:18 a.m.
Thread:
Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Justafan79</b></div><div>No I'd argue you actually did."Panthers are 13th in terms of average weight of each player." Clearly gives the impression they're not a heavy play team . There's a difference in being tough and Heavy you can be tough and mentally (which is what your comments infer), and not play a heavy game which Florida does and extremely well.</div></div>
And the sentence right after I said "m not saying they aren't tough/durable. They clearly are." Which implies i agree with bolded. You either chose to ignore that cause you have a personal problem with me (unlikely you know me personally) or you're displaying cognitive bias, assuming I've got it out for the panthers. Rest assured I both a) think the panthers are a great hockey team and in a good position to win and b) couldn't possibly care less about that org lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 28 at 11:33 p.m.
Thread:
Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Justafan79</b></div><div>I never said they played heavy in Lieu of being talented ,but they're a very physical team.</div></div>
Neither did I lol. I said the team above (the ACGM) would be playing physical in lieu of talent. The panthers were a small anecdote on a discussion about the Sabres.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 28 at 11:32 p.m.
Thread:
Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tjm220</b></div><div>I’m not sure I would agree with that. When you look at the players, they did call up from Rochester (Rousek, Kulich, Rosen, technically Jost) They were all equally ineffective. You could argue that Rosen and Kulich simply weren’t ready yet, but Rousek got 15 games and managed only two points. He was completely unnoticeable for large stretches of time, unless it was him getting knocked off the puck. He just didn’t provide any energy like he had done in his few games the previous year. If you’re playing fourth line minutes, providing some energy is as simple as being the guy who throws a big hit, maybe causing a turnover. I don’t think most people expect much offense out of your fourth line, but more than almost none would still be an improvement from what we’re currently looking at.</div></div>
kulich and rosen also got basically no ice time and bad teammate quality. But if we're talking about next year, they are probably better options in the bottom six than a guy like jeannot. This team doesn't have the top end talent to get away with toughening up the bottom six at the cost of taking TOI away from kulich/rosen. If they win its going to be because they've loaded up so much first round talent coaches cant get the matchups they want.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 28 at 11:27 p.m.
Thread:
Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stadel</b></div><div>a) that's a bar (jost/robinson) that most of rochester could clear. </div></div>
I’m not sure I would agree with that. When you look at the players, they did call up from Rochester (Rousek, Kulich, Rosen, technically Jost) They were all equally ineffective. You could argue that Rosen and Kulich simply weren’t ready yet, but Rousek got 15 games and managed only two points. He was completely unnoticeable for large stretches of time, unless it was him getting knocked off the puck. He just didn’t provide any energy like he had done in his few games the previous year. If you’re playing fourth line minutes, providing some energy is as simple as being the guy who throws a big hit, maybe causing a turnover. I don’t think most people expect much offense out of your fourth line, but more than almost none would still be an improvement from what we’re currently looking at.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 28 at 11:24 p.m.
Thread:
Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Justafan79</b></div><div>They play a very heavy physical game if you say they don't you either
A) don't watch them
B) are clueless
C) are purposely lying.</div></div>
or our definitions of physical are different? They throw a lot of borderline hits and whine a lot. They are also very talented all throughout the lineup. That's the key to success. That's what I'm arguing the Sabres should do. Instead of adding physicality at the cost of talent, they should internalize the idea that its not about playing fair. That's what the panthers do well. It's not just a couple of tough guys setting the tone. Everyone from line 1 to 4 and on D has bought into that message.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 28 at 9:44 p.m.
Thread:
Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Justafan79</b></div><div>Florida isn't a heavy team. Clearly you don't watch them at all they led the league in PIMs and are a very heavy team
Tkachuk, Bennett, Reinhardt,Montour Ekblad, OEL, Mikkola, Lomborg, <strong>Rodriguez, Okposo</strong>, Cousins, Lorenzo, Stenlund , Gadjovich.</div></div>
Homie trying to slip evan rodrigues and kyle okposo in there like I wouldn't know these guys arent a "tough archetype" lol. Also leading the nhl in PIMs isn't indicative of being a heavy team. The Sabres were ahead of the Rangers and Caps in total penalty minutes. Would anyone believe they are a tougher/heavier team?
Panthers are 13th in terms of average weight of each player. Im not saying they aren't tough/durable. They clearly are. You have to be to survive having a target on your back because of how you play.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 28 at 9:04 p.m.
Thread:
Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tjm220</b></div><div>Jeannot isn’t here in this instance to replace any of the top 6 offense. Although even if he only replicates the same numbers he had this year, <strong>he would be more useful than Robinson and Jost combined. He’s here to add 200 hits to an offense that doesn’t hit anyone. </strong>He’s an upgrade to the fourth line that sorely needs one, and he cost barely more than we were paying Girgensons this year.</div></div>
a) that's a bar (jost/robinson) that most of rochester could clear. And b), why does this matter? year after year we see that hit totals have absolutely no correlation to success in the post season. People look at teams like Florida and come to that conclusion.
Florida isn't a heavy team, it's a competitive and whiny team. That's what they are good at. They goad their opponents into believing that toughness is their issue by throwing borderline hits, cheap punches after whistles, and still images of 3rd pair d-men screaming at rookie goalies. Not to mention Maurice acting like a toddler on the bench. But that's exactly what we should want from the Sabres.
We don't need sherrif Jeannot throwing 200 hits and taking ill advised penalties. We need to double down on the offense and beat teams like florida at their own game without getting away from ours.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 28 at 8:28 p.m.
Thread:
Moves
You asked for Boone. You already know the answer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 28 at 8:26 p.m.
Thread:
Moves
i genuinely want to know what the thought process behind some sabres fans here is with regards to adding a guy like jeannot. The sabres had trouble scoring goals last year. Our rivals north of the QEW sacrificed their league leading offense for toughness, and cant score against a bruins team that is a shell of its former self. So obviously we have to follow that same pattern?
Let's actually score goals and get into the playoffs before we worry about how tough these guys are/aren't and whether that actually matters.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Apr. 27 at 1:05 p.m.
Thread:
Montreal can target them instead of others
Ik this is gonna sound kind of weird but bear with me.
Jack Quinn is the least available player in the league lol. The Sabres love him
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Apr. 27 at 12:52 p.m.
Thread:
Montreal can target them instead of others
Holtz isn’t good and Jack Quinn isn’t available.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 27 at 3:07 p.m.
Thread:
Please
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ujeje</b></div><div>I think Flyers accept.</div></div>
Yeah they would. I would accept just the 1st.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 27 at 2:57 p.m.
Thread:
Please
I think Flyers accept.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 27 at 8:16 p.m.
Thread:
CASEY
In the unlikely event we even present an offer sheet Colorado probably matches. On the bright side if they didn’t maybe that first rounder is late anyway so it’s not much of a loss.
First
2
3
4
Next
Page 3
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com