joeyloeffler

Timelord

Member Since

Feb. 19, 2016

Favourite Team

Columbus Blue Jackets

2nd Favourite Team

Winnipeg Jets

Forum Posts

Posts per Day

0.0

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 19, 2017 at 2:38 p.m.

Thread: Searching for a 2 line center

Not bad because getting Roslovic would be fun, but is Perreault an improvement over Dubinsky at 2/3C? I would argue not, so not sure it makes sense.

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 19, 2017 at 11:08 a.m.

Thread: Duchene

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jacketsman61</b></div><div>That's too much to me. Essentially it is 2 first round picks and a 2nd round pick.</div></div>

I have to agree, I would consider Murray and Jenner (yay cap space), but not three with Carlsson

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 18, 2017 at 3:29 p.m.

Thread: Blue Jackets

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jacketsman61</b></div><div>Bjorkstrand is a no go. Like Duchene but not at the expense of Bjorkstrand</div></div>

I don't think Bjorkstrand is an automatic non-starter, but actually do lean towards not wanting to trade him. If I'm actually looking at making this trade, I'm probably giving it to the deadline to get a more extended look at Bjorkstrand. To be honest, Sakic is probably thinking the same thing from the other side.

I'd also rather trade a LW than a RW (than we shouldn't need to throw money at Stafford/Jagr/or other).

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 29, 2017 at 12:09 p.m.

Thread: Bluejackets all rumours

I am totally against the rumored Bonino interest. Yes, he is good but we don't need another 3C and don't need to spend the millions that it would take. We need a 1/2C

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 27, 2017 at 1:27 p.m.

Thread: One small trade followed by a big one

I don't think that Colorado quite takes that, may need some picks, otherwise I do like it. Note: I don't think Duchene is worth what they are actually (supposedly) asking for though . . .

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 27, 2017 at 1:24 p.m.

Thread: Columbus - Opening Day

With this same line-up, I think that I'd try Sonny up with Nick and Calvert on the fourth line . . .

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 2, 2016 at 4:50 p.m.

Thread: Line Charts . . . Top 6 Gagne? whatttttttt!

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bwells</b></div><div><i>Gagner is extremely talented, but is not reliable defensively and often attempts zone entries indiscriminately, so I think a spot on the wing suits him better. Plus, he is not a finisher, so he needs quality line mates. A second line of Foligno - Jenner - Gagner would be great IMO</i></div></div>

I do not disagree, however I just don't understand signing him for a solution at wing other than it is a low cost flier. If we're gonna try a winger in the top 6 that is not Bjork, I say we throw Milano in there. Granted if they aren't quite ready, I guess we have a cheap backup plan now.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>billcriddle</b></div><div><i>Pardon the inquiry, but if he can't finish, and he can't take a faceoff, and he can't enter the zone all that well, and he isn't a shut down center, how can you say he's extremely talented?</i></div></div>
Hahaha, touche'

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 19, 2016 at 5:34 p.m.

Thread: What if flip side

I don't think we should really be actively chasing Bostons 2nd (possibly 3rd) best center at 30 years of age as our solution for a 1C.

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 11, 2016 at 4:31 p.m.

Thread: Next summer

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jacketsman61</b></div><div><i>It is full.</i></div></div>

I think he wants a 23rd

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 8, 2016 at 7:26 p.m.

Thread: Vegas

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jacketsman61</b></div><div><i>Columbus is going to protect Wennberg. Not happening.</i></div></div>

Yeah, and I think that Vegas will try hover just a little over the floor for the first year or so for flexibility .

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 7, 2016 at 11:45 p.m.

Thread: If we must trade Hartsy

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jacketsman61</b></div><div><i>We are not getting Lindholm for Hartnell. Try again</i></div></div>

Then put in Nestrasil, I don't care. I just meant to show that I feel Carolina is best set up to take Hartnell in a trade after AZs and WPGs recent actions. Personally, I'd keep Hartsy unless some kids really show up in camp and the first half.

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 7, 2016 at 11:39 p.m.

Thread: If we must trade Hartsy

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsForTheWin</b></div><div><i>Hartnell has no value. If he had a 1 year contract you could get a 1st at the deadline, but noone is going to give a good asset for a 34 year old grinder with 3 years left. I'm sick of delusional CBJ fan's. You guys are worse than leaf fans on hfboards. STOP TROLLING HARTNELL!</i></div></div>

A. I'd be OK keeping him, hence the "if we have to."
B. In a world where McGinn is worth 3.3 for the same term and Perrault is worth 4.25 with an EXTRA year, Hartnell should be trade able to some degree.

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 7, 2016 at 11:30 p.m.

Thread: If we must trade Hartsy

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>moorese7en</b></div><div><i>A star prospect RW for an aging vet on a bad contract and a poor defenseman...and CAR throws in a pick??</i></div></div>

My main driver is that I'm not too high on Lindholm, if Carolina is I wouldn't be adverse to not sending him in return. Cody has decent bottom pairing potential but admittedly nothing to get excited for.

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 7, 2016 at 11:11 p.m.

Thread: Best Cap Team Challenge (3yr + contracts, Cap compliant)

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DonVito</b></div><div><i>All UND team, that's pretty cool</i></div></div>

Hey! I was wondering if anyone would notice without calling attention to it!

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 5, 2016 at 4:04 p.m.

Thread: Eberle

IMO . . . We don't really need a RW, we don't need a 3rd line C/W. I would like to see Bjork and/or Anderson get a chance. Left wing isn't a huge priority, Sonny could get a look at 2C with Calvert on the third . . . that is if we were to trade away Hartnell. I'm not sure how much sense buying out Clarkson makes on the ledger. Wouldn't mind having Schenn but I'd rather pay 1/4 the price to play Werenski or Kukan.

Where is Wennberg? GC better not be out third line center.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 16, 2016 at 2:51 p.m.

Thread: I'm not sure if this one would work?

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>billcriddle</b></div><div><i>Clarkson for Brown? The last thing CBJ needs is adding $600k to cap payroll and 1 year term to contract (through 2021-22) for a 31 yr old winger.</i></div></div>

Not sticking up for it, but only thing maybe . . . Brown's contract might be more "buy outable" due to the way that Clarkson's is structured?

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2016 at 1:00 p.m.

Thread: What do you think?

Looooooooooooooooove it . . . Seems pretty close to fair, or at least the framework could be there IF NJD is willing to take Clarksy. Then if we Tyson Jost at 11 (right about where he is trending) . . . I would be over the moon.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2016 at 11:48 a.m.

Thread: trade the pick

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jel779</b></div><div><i>I don't think that will be enough to get Lindholm.</i></div></div>

yeah, and I don't know if Lindholm is the number one center that we are dreaming of.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2016 at 11:40 a.m.

Thread: More rumors

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mikeyscav</b></div><div><i>Who are Campbell and Boll? I'm fine with moving Reinhart (it will sting though lol) as long as we get fair value back. Reinhart is already a top 6 forward too. Whether he's on wing or center, need to make room for him there</i></div></div>

They are contracts that we would want to move. They are maaaaaaaaaaaybe top 13 forwards . . . Boll is a buyout candidate. Campbell is worth a fourth line role.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2016 at 11:34 a.m.

Thread: Big Trade with EDM

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jacketsman61</b></div><div><i>Wow, with all due respect, that is by far the worst trade I have seen. Ryan Murray is not going anywhere. Even if we did have interest in trading him, he would command a lot more than that. A lot more.</i></div></div>

I kind of see the idea of using Murray to get rid of some contracts, but then we are retaining almost four million dollars anyway . . . might as well just buy Tyutin out. Plus mortgaging a good young D and getting the 4 pick, I don't like it. I don't love what I perceive as the value of a four pick. Between Jost, Brown, Keller . . . Dubois?) A great center prospect could be available through pick 10 or maybe even lower.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2016 at 11:27 a.m.

Thread: Trade of the Century

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsForTheWin</b></div><div><i>This is like walking into a store and buying a diamond ring, while paying them a bag full of crap.</i></div></div>

Hahaha, but let's be honest, a diamond is just a rock. The value is not intrinsic, it is assigned by society. Waste materials could be converted into biofuels . . .

I'll throw in Wennberg too.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14, 2016 at 6:00 p.m.

Thread: CBJ - ARI - EDM - NSH Trade

Yeah, you at least need to create a player to show who you're drafting at seven too.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14, 2016 at 5:57 p.m.

Thread: Unload Contracts

Well, who are you taking with the 'Yotes pick? TYSON JOST!!! . . . and I don't think I'd trade Hartsy and retain 50%

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 9, 2016 at 3:24 p.m.

Thread: 2016

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>alex4avs</b></div><div><i>Pretty confident that Avs trade wouldn't fly. MacKinnon is probably untouchable, but if moved to CBJ, Jenner or Atkinson would have to be involved. Also there's no way they take in that full Hartnett cap hit.

Let me try to make this deal work.

MacKinnon for Jenner + Johnson + 3rd round pick
Compher + 10 overall pick for Rychel and the 3rd overall??

Idunno, that's the best I can think of right now.</i></div></div>

From a CBJ fan perspective. I have Jenner as near untouchable, and the chance at hitting on Compher isn't really worth losing the chance on hitting with the Fin (especially if getting MacKinnon for the center position (and having the chance to draft Logan Brown or Tyson Jost at number 10. Yet, I think your trade is very fair, I just personally don't like it. Getting rid of a Johnson's NTC before expansion and two tough salaries (JJ and Hartsy) is a big positive.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 7, 2016 at 6:38 p.m.

Thread: Post Calder Cup

I have an irrational loathing for Miller because he spurned UND however I still give you 4 stars. Irrational loathing aside I objectively think that I can say that we should try to get a better number one Center.

First23 Next

Page 2

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

joeyloeffler

Timelord

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day