SalarySwishSalarySwish

Flat Cap no CBO with Neal BO option 2

Created by: CD282
Team: 2020-21 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 18, 2020
Published: Apr. 18, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
See my original post here with suggested options:

https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/322121

And the Option 1 thread:

https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/322151
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,250,000
2$2,500,000
2$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,750,000
1$2,500,000
3$5,400,000
1$1,500,000
1$1,350,000
Trades
1.
EDM
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (CBJ)
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (OTT)
OTT
  1. Benning, Matthew [RFA Rights]
  2. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Reserve List]
2.
EDM
  1. 2020 3rd round pick (WSH)
3.
EDM
  1. 2021 5th round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
Any team that needs a shutdown D / PK guy. Trade happens after Russell's July 1st bonus is paid, therefore he's owed just $1.5M for his final season.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2021
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the EDM
2022
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$82,466,032$341,534$730,000-$966,032
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$230,000$230K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 6
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$808,333$808,333
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$875,000$875,000
LW
UFA - 1
$1,350,000$1,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,600,000$5,600,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,166,666$4,166,666
RD
UFA - 1
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Apr. 18, 2020 at 1:48 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 2,517
Which one do you like better?
Apr. 18, 2020 at 2:11 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,751
Quoting: Copenhagen
Which one do you like better?


Probably option 1, it's a strong lineup top to bottom. This option gives McDavid a better weapon on RW (could be Toffoli or Dadonov rather than Hoffman) so a stronger top-6, which might actually get the better results because the top-6 plays 60-70% of the 5v5 TOI. I did get most of the bottom-6 improvements into this one too... if Hoffman scores 35 vs Smith's likely 25 next to McDavid, is that worth the slight downgrade of the bottom-6? Does the line do better defensively with Hoffman or Toffoli vs with Smith? No point in paying for the increased production if they're going to give it all back at the other end.

Another thing to think about is what happens when an injury occurs: if your top-6 is loaded and you have a big drop off in talent after that, you could be in trouble if someone from the top-6 sustains a serious and lengthly injury. Option 1 would be better in this case.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 2:15 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 2,517
Quoting: CD282
Probably option 1, it's a strong lineup top to bottom. This option gives McDavid a better weapon on RW (could be Toffoli or Dadonov rather than Hoffman) so a stronger top-6, which might actually get the better results because the top-6 plays 60-70% of the 5v5 TOI. I did get most of the bottom-6 improvements into this one too... if Hoffman scores 35 vs Smith's likely 25 next to McDavid, is that worth the slight downgrade of the bottom-6? Does the line do better defensively with Hoffman or Toffoli vs with Smith? No point in paying for the increased production if they're going to give it all back at the other end.

Another thing to think about is what happens when an injury occurs: if your top-6 is loaded and you have a big drop off in talent after that, you could be in trouble if someone from the top-6 sustains a serious and lengthly injury. Option 1 would be better in this case.


Toffoli is to slow I think, another option might be Killhorn from TB. Option 1 gives you guys that can move up for injury easy. It is well done. Good job.
CD282 liked this.
See All