SalarySwishSalarySwish

Blackhawks Prospect and Youth Pyramid

Created by: Tyler_A10
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: May 19, 2021
Published: May 26, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Please ignore all cap hits for resignings, they do not matter for this exercise. This is my Hawks youth pyramid, basically all players who will be 25 and under at the start of next season (26 and under for goalies) ranked into tiers based on their potential, current ability and play so far. Tier 1-3 is Left wing, center and right wing, Tier 4 is LD, tier 5 is RD and tier 6 is the scratches. LTIR is all players who are too old for the pyramid. Goalies can't fit in any of the slots so I have them listed by how I'd rank them by potential. As for the pyramid, I have Commesso, Soderblom and Lankinen in tier 3, and Basse in tier 6. Here is the link to my forum post on capfriendly where I explain all of my decisions:
https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/454174

Sidenote: John Quenneville will not be included as he is set to be a UFA at seasons end and is not likely to come back after a terrible AHL season.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
2$900,000
3$900,000
2$900,000
3$900,000
2$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
2$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$925,000
1$925,000
1$925,000
1$925,000
1$925,000
1$925,000
1$925,000
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the FLA
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
52$81,500,000$55,539,630$452,439$6,157,500$25,960,370
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
LW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
LW
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
LD
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$817,500$817,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$912,500$912,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$883,750$883,750 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$811,667$811,667 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
LW
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
C, LW, RW
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$820,000$820,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$866,667$866,667
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$853,333$853,333
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$859,167$859,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
C
UFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
RW, C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$825,833$825,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$880,833$880,833
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$825,833$825,833 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
C, LW
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
RD, C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

May 27, 2021 at 12:16 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 1,805
Dach is the definition of a tier 1 prospect...
ChiHawk liked this.
May 27, 2021 at 12:35 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 348
Likes: 155
Quoting: TheFlamingC
Dach is the definition of a tier 1 prospect...


I love Kirby, but I really don’t see him on that level. He did make the NHL right away, but he was seen as a reach in his draft class. Tier 1 to me is guys with franchise changing potential, but at no point yet has he been a star level player. I recognize he’s had injuries, but he’s also gotten hurt 3 separate times in 2 seasons in the NHL, so that hurts his pedigree too in my eyes. I’m usually really strict on why qualifies as a tier 1 prospect but if he truly takes the next step and goes from a guy with top 6 potential to solidified top 6 production at only 20-21 years old, he’s absolutely moving up to tier 1.
TheFlamingC liked this.
May 27, 2021 at 12:58 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,047
Likes: 9,349
Quoting: Tyler_A10
I love Kirby, but I really don’t see him on that level. He did make the NHL right away, but he was seen as a reach in his draft class. Tier 1 to me is guys with franchise changing potential, but at no point yet has he been a star level player. I recognize he’s had injuries, but he’s also gotten hurt 3 separate times in 2 seasons in the NHL, so that hurts his pedigree too in my eyes. I’m usually really strict on why qualifies as a tier 1 prospect but if he truly takes the next step and goes from a guy with top 6 potential to solidified top 6 production at only 20-21 years old, he’s absolutely moving up to tier 1.


He's also 20 years old. Dach is all day a franchise talent. The question is, after being rushed last season and injuries this year, when will he put it together.

Mitchell should be up a tier. For one, he had more pedigree then Wyatt Kaiser in the NCAA. Two, keep in mind he's in his first pro season (abbreviated season). Let's see the kid play a full season first.

It seems with your rankings that you are mixing up what a kid shows in the juniors or college versus being rushed into action in the NHL and not being an immediate impact player and shoe-in. Dach as example. For all intents and purposes, Dach is the definition of a franchise player. Mitchell being rated lower then Kaiser is another good example. Mitchell was more recognized in the NCAA as a top defender then Kaiser currently is, so because he was rushed into action and you didn't think he was a stud out of the gate you're saying Kaiser is now higher? Don't you think if Kaiser played this season in the NHL he'd look worse then Mitchell? I think you are missing the entire development piece of a player transitioning to the NHL. Boqvist, a prime example of what happens when a player is rushed...he looked bad last year, had a lot of bad moments this year but some good ones, next season should improve again. Dach and Mitchell should be the same and Kaiser will look out of place when he (if he) transitions to the NHL. Very very few players jump right in and look fantastic, those are the elite ones like Cat, Kane, McDavid, Matthews, etc. but the vast majority take a long time like Keith who didn't look very good his first season or two yet is a HOF elite player.
May 27, 2021 at 1:15 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 348
Likes: 155
Edited May 27, 2021 at 1:24 a.m.
Quoting: ChiHawk
He's also 20 years old. Dach is all day a franchise talent. The question is, after being rushed last season and injuries this year, when will he put it together.

Mitchell should be up a tier. For one, he had more pedigree then Wyatt Kaiser in the NCAA. Two, keep in mind he's in his first pro season (abbreviated season). Let's see the kid play a full season first.

It seems with your rankings that you are mixing up what a kid shows in the juniors or college versus being rushed into action in the NHL and not being an immediate impact player and shoe-in. Dach as example. For all intents and purposes, Dach is the definition of a franchise player. Mitchell being rated lower then Kaiser is another good example. Mitchell was more recognized in the NCAA as a top defender then Kaiser currently is, so because he was rushed into action and you didn't think he was a stud out of the gate you're saying Kaiser is now higher? Don't you think if Kaiser played this season in the NHL he'd look worse then Mitchell? I think you are missing the entire development piece of a player transitioning to the NHL. Boqvist, a prime example of what happens when a player is rushed...he looked bad last year, had a lot of bad moments this year but some good ones, next season should improve again. Dach and Mitchell should be the same and Kaiser will look out of place when he (if he) transitions to the NHL. Very very few players jump right in and look fantastic, those are the elite ones like Cat, Kane, McDavid, Matthews, etc. but the vast majority take a long time like Keith who didn't look very good his first season or two yet is a HOF elite player.


I’m really not sold on Ian Mitchell, I’ve been watching him for years and the upside really is not there. I don’t see him ever becoming much more than a 3rd pairing guy, but he could play in the NHL for a while in that role. He has very little polish to his game in either the offensive or defensive zone. His only high quality trait right now is his puck moving. It also doesn’t help that when Kalynuk and Beaudin played in the AHL, they absolutely destroyed the league. Meanwhile, Mitchell was far worse in his time down in the minors.
Kaiser has far more potential than Mitchell, he was a major boom/bust prospect coming out of the draft. Truly an elite skater with some of the best endurance in a college hockey player. I’d even say that outside of Boqvist, he has the highest upside of any defenseman in our organization, the likelihood of hitting that ceiling is low which is what caused him to go lower in his draft class and why he’s only a tier 3, but given how great he was in his first college season, I’m expecting a lot.
Also worth mentioning that Mitchell essentially flatlined in his development across his three seasons at Denver, Kaiser still hasn’t scratched the surface of what he’s truly capable of.

As for the Kirby stuff, is he really ever gonna be better than peak Nuge, Duchene, or Johansen? They were 60-70 point players at their best and that’s what I see as the ceiling for Kirby. That’s not a tier 1 player in my eyes if that’s the best you can be. Fringe 1Cs who were really good 2Cs. I don’t see Dach on the level of Matthews and McDavid or even prime Stamkos or Tavares. He’s not that, he’s closer to the Duchene level.


(Btw: The tiers are based on a combo of potential and likelihood to hit said potential. If I was basing it off current quality, the top of the pyramid would be exclusively current NHL players and that’s not fun when projecting the future. I did have Mitchell in tier 3 last year, but after watching him a full season in the NHL, there’s just a lack of Top 4 defenseman skills)
See All