SalarySwishSalarySwish

Going into the playoffs

Created by: CoolHandL
Team: 2021-22 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 21, 2022
Published: Jan. 21, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Trades
PHI
  1. Khusnutdinov, Marat [Reserve List]
  2. Rask, Victor
  3. 2022 1st round pick (MIN)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2024
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$78,254,421$0$682,500$3,245,579
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,137,500$4,137,500
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,100,000$5,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$825,833$825,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,575,000$7,575,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,666,667$3,666,667
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,125,000$1,125,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$900,000$900,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$795,000$795,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jan. 21, 2022 at 3:04 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,670
Likes: 1,916
Cant be Khusnutdinov. Too valuable of a prospect. I don’t think MN should be trading futures, but if they were to pursue G, I think it’s one of [O Rourke, Hunt, maaaaybe Beckman or obviously anyone lesser, Pillar, Bankier, etc].
TanSor and dlt_hfu2847whsba liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 3:07 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 433
Likes: 275
Quoting: drmantalban
Cant be Khusnutdinov. Too valuable of a prospect. I don’t think MN should be trading futures, but if they were to pursue G, I think it’s one of [O Rourke, Hunt, maaaaybe Beckman or obviously anyone lesser, Pillar, Bankier, etc].


It'd have to be at least one big future - I waffled between Khusnutdinov and a Hunt/O'Rourke... hoping it would be one of those defensemen instead, for sure. I figure they'd be ok giving up the 1st because they can trade Fiala in the summer for another one.
MNCountryClub, TanSor and B_seka17 liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 3:10 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,670
Likes: 1,916
Quoting: CoolHandL
It'd have to be at least one big future - I waffled between Khusnutdinov and a Hunt/O'Rourke... hoping it would be one of those defensemen instead, for sure. I figure they'd be ok giving up the 1st because they can trade Fiala in the summer for another one.


Yeah I think if you want Giroux, it’s roughly a 1st and a B type prospect. But IMO, MIN absolutely should not include Khust for a rental. I’d really rather they didn’t go get a rental, but if it has to happen, Marats in my list of untouchables.
TanSor and CoolHandL liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 3:12 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: CoolHandL
It'd have to be at least one big future - I waffled between Khusnutdinov and a Hunt/O'Rourke... hoping it would be one of those defensemen instead, for sure. I figure they'd be ok giving up the 1st because they can trade Fiala in the summer for another one.


And that's exactly why I think acquiring Giroux is a bad idea. We need all the ELC players we can get and while Giroux would be great there's no way we can keep him past this year. If we trade Fiala in the offseason to recoup assets spent on Giroux then we're essentially just offloading Fiala for nothing long-term.

I think I'm in a minority amongst Wild fans but I really don't like the idea of acquiring a rental for a 1st + a good prospect. The Hanzal trade probably ruined that idea forever for me...
MNCountryClub and CoolHandL liked this.
Jan. 21, 2022 at 3:20 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 433
Likes: 275
Quoting: TanSor
And that's exactly why I think acquiring Giroux is a bad idea. We need all the ELC players we can get and while Giroux would be great there's no way we can keep him past this year. If we trade Fiala in the offseason to recoup assets spent on Giroux then we're essentially just offloading Fiala for nothing long-term.

I think I'm in a minority amongst Wild fans but I really don't like the idea of acquiring a rental for a 1st + a good prospect. The Hanzal trade probably ruined that idea forever for me...


I hear you about Hanzal, that stung bad. Giroux is a whole other level (and temperament) of player though. I do think it is more likely that Guerin does not make this kind of rental move, but if they really want to go for the cup this spring I think this kind of trade has to be looked at.
TanSor and MNCountryClub liked this.
See All