Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,448
Likes: 1,589
Nashville trade: That's too much to give up for Jeannot. I get that you may be counting on him being more of the player he was last year and that's fine, but I really don't think anyone should give up a 1st for someone with 14 points on the year- not to mention a B propsect on top of that. Change the pick to the '23 2nd or the '24 2nd with a condition that it becomes a 1st based on Jeannot's performance and I think that's more reasonable.
Philly trade: Looks fine to me. Might be shy for PHI fans given Seeler's cost effectiveness, though.
Columbus trade: This is a very hard no. The reported demand for Gavrikov w/ 50% retained is around a 1st and a 3rd and even that's pretty absurdly high in my eyes. Then you add in Holloway and Yamo in exchange for Bemstrom and this trade quickly reaches the territory of the absurd. Both Holloway and Broberg are reported as being non-starters even in deals for big names, so there's no reason to believe Gavrikov and Bemstrom (who passed through waivers earlier this year) would change that. If your argument is that Holloway is the cost to dump Yamo's cap hit in order to fit these other additions, you're better off keeping Yamo, removing Bemstrom from the deal, and either sending down Shore or getting PHI to retain 50% of MacEwen's deal.
All-in-all, I don't hate the targets but these proposals could use some refinement.
McDavid, Connor
$250,000)
Jwilliams2k12 and LloydminsterLarry liked this.
CapFriendly
CapFriendly