SalarySwishSalarySwish

My Lines for Opening Night

Created by: SJSGM
Team: 2023-24 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 11, 2023
Published: Oct. 11, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I know that these aren't the lines and pairings that the Sharks have been so far in practice nor do I expect this at all, but this is what I personally would want

Sharks have been running a top line of Hoffman-Hertl-Zadina for 4 straight days now in practice, which doesn't really make sense to me. You have a lot of great playmakers in the lineup like Eklund, Barabanov, Bordeleau, and Granlund, so why would you have a line of all shooters? Doesn't make sense. Keep Zadina on the top line w/ Hertl so you have the Czechs together and can hopefully unlock Zadina, but switch Hoffman for Eklund so you have a playmaker with those two shooters.
2nd line for me is the same as SJ has been running in practice. Give Bordeleau a legit shot with legit linemates, and hopefully Bordeleau/Barabanov can set up Duclair a lot.
3rd line you have two shooters in Hoffman/Kunin centered by Granlund, who can only pass.
4th line has Sturm/Zetterlund to be solid defensively/physically and Labanc can maybe chip in a bit w/ the goals.
I like Smith but don't know who you'd take out for him

Ferraro-Benning as the top pair which is a brutal top pairing, but gotta work w/ what we have. Both are solid defensively and physically, and can log big minutes.
Thrun-Rutta has been used at practice, hopefully Rutta can provide a steady presence for Thrun and help Thrun develop into a legit middle pairing guy. Thrun might honestly be the best defenseman on the team (which is wild) but I don't want to put him on the top pair right away, be more careful.
Have really liked Knyzhov so far in preseason, a solid/steady defensive bottom pairing with Emberson, who I've also liked.
Vlasic scratched because why should he play over anyone in the lineup? I honestly don't think he's a better player than anyone in the top 6 (and if he is than it's really close) and he's not part of the team's future, so why not give another, younger guy those minutes? You know what you're getting with Burroughs, no upside but definitely like his physicality and defensive play.
Kahkonen starts, he's looked really solid in preseason.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WSH
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$79,575,001$25,000$1,062,500$3,924,999

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$916,667$916,667
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$762,500$762,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Oct. 11, 2023 at 3:24 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,254
Likes: 4,677
I am 100% in agreement with your line combos! My only thought is I really feel like Eklund and Bordeleau together! They had chemestry! Same so far with Duclair and Barabanov and Hertl and Zadina. Mixing in Hoffman Granlund and Kunin to mix and match would be nice! It’s way easier once Couture comes back though.

The D I can’t agree more…. But I don’t see how you scratch Vlasic to start the season. (Though I want to!) Maybe after a handful of games, but last year he wasn’t bad so unless he regresses again this year I think Quinn is forced to play him. But to me Knyzhov Embersom and Thrun have to play this year! Thrun I have a feeling is a long term top 4 D for us but with Embersom and Knyzhov we have to see if they are guys you build with or move on from. Personally I feel Knyzhov is a better D than Vlasic and maybe even Ferraro and Embersom could be the best RD we have on the roster right now.

Next year I don’t see how Thrun and Mukhamadulin aren’t playing every night and if the sharks do anything in FA it would be to pick up a RD like Pesce. Or someone who is a top 4 with some offensive ability. So this is the year for Embersom and Knyzhov to shine or move on.

Still don’t know why we signed Burroughs to be honest especially to 3 year deal.
yikes, areax91 and SJSGM liked this.
Oct. 11, 2023 at 3:40 p.m.
#2
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,093
Likes: 12,836
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I am 100% in agreement with your line combos! My only thought is I really feel like Eklund and Bordeleau together! They had chemestry! Same so far with Duclair and Barabanov and Hertl and Zadina. Mixing in Hoffman Granlund and Kunin to mix and match would be nice! It’s way easier once Couture comes back though.

The D I can’t agree more…. But I don’t see how you scratch Vlasic to start the season. (Though I want to!) Maybe after a handful of games, but last year he wasn’t bad so unless he regresses again this year I think Quinn is forced to play him. But to me Knyzhov Embersom and Thrun have to play this year! Thrun I have a feeling is a long term top 4 D for us but with Embersom and Knyzhov we have to see if they are guys you build with or move on from. Personally I feel Knyzhov is a better D than Vlasic and maybe even Ferraro and Embersom could be the best RD we have on the roster right now.

Next year I don’t see how Thrun and Mukhamadulin aren’t playing every night and if the sharks do anything in FA it would be to pick up a RD like Pesce. Or someone who is a top 4 with some offensive ability. So this is the year for Embersom and Knyzhov to shine or move on.

Still don’t know why we signed Burroughs to be honest especially to 3 year deal.


I hope by mid year :

Eklund - Hertl - Zadina
Couture - Bordeleau - Barabanov
(I’d rather extend Barabanov and trade Duclair)

Trade Duclair for value
Hopefully find some value for Hoffman
Move Labanc

Zetterlund/ Kunin - Granlund - Kunin/ Zetter
Smith - Strum - Trade move

Thrun - Rutta
Ferraro - Benning
Shakir (for a tryout by end year) - Knyzhov

Goalies (like to see Chrona get some reps like Maki)
Oct. 11, 2023 at 3:58 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,254
Likes: 4,677
Quoting: yikes
I hope by mid year :

Eklund - Hertl - Zadina
Couture - Bordeleau - Barabanov
(I’d rather extend Barabanov and trade Duclair)

Trade Duclair for value
Hopefully find some value for Hoffman
Move Labanc

Zetterlund/ Kunin - Granlund - Kunin/ Zetter
Smith - Strum - Trade move

Thrun - Rutta
Ferraro - Benning
Shakir (for a tryout by end year) - Knyzhov

Goalies (like to see Chrona get some reps like Maki)


Agree with resigning Barbi! Wouldn’t mind resigning Duclair if he fits well.
I am hoping Kahkonen rebounds like it looked like in preseason and training camp!

I want to be patient with Mukhamadulin! We’ve rushed so many D and destroyed their careers
areax91 liked this.
Oct. 11, 2023 at 6:22 p.m.
#4
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,093
Likes: 12,836
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Agree with resigning Barbi! Wouldn’t mind resigning Duclair if he fits well.
I am hoping Kahkonen rebounds like it looked like in preseason and training camp!

I want to be patient with Mukhamadulin! We’ve rushed so many D and destroyed their careers


Oh I just mean use his 9 games like Eklund (if he’s performing well). But agreed.

I like to see those 9 games, as while to some it’s a small sample size, I believe if a player has “IT” he’ll show it.

Like Eklund being sent down after his 9 games was the 10/10 correct thing to do. But those 9 games, while not perfect nor being a prospect like Bedard; showed Eklund has it. He now just has to keep it.

I’d like to see Shakir and what we’ve got similarly. Like Thrun showed last year. Thrun could be something (not just a 3rd pair or 4th guy) and that’s what we saw in his showcase. And much like Eklund, Thruns now gotta keep it.

Obviously there are flashes in the pan (Kiviranta for example) but I always like seeing how prospects handle an NHL “vacation” from the AHL.
Rob32sjsharks and areax91 liked this.
Oct. 11, 2023 at 7:03 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,254
Likes: 4,677
Quoting: yikes
Oh I just mean use his 9 games like Eklund (if he’s performing well). But agreed.

I like to see those 9 games, as while to some it’s a small sample size, I believe if a player has “IT” he’ll show it.

Like Eklund being sent down after his 9 games was the 10/10 correct thing to do. But those 9 games, while not perfect nor being a prospect like Bedard; showed Eklund has it. He now just has to keep it.

I’d like to see Shakir and what we’ve got similarly. Like Thrun showed last year. Thrun could be something (not just a 3rd pair or 4th guy) and that’s what we saw in his showcase. And much like Eklund, Thruns now gotta keep it.

Obviously there are flashes in the pan (Kiviranta for example) but I always like seeing how prospects handle an NHL “vacation” from the AHL.


Hot damn you and I are very much on the same exact page!
What is your thoughts on Laroque?
areax91 liked this.
See All