SalarySwishSalarySwish

18/19 Simple version (?)

Created by: ricochetii
Team: 2018-19 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 6, 2018
Published: Jan. 6, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
One questionable trade, if Hamhuis doesn't stay in Dallas, and they want to dump Hanzal to replace him with Alzner.
Two realistic (?) UFA signings, along with re-signing our own players.
Strip Pacioretty of the C. He doesn't need the pressure. Give it to Gallagher. Nothing bothers him anyway.
Replace the assistant coaches. Muller can be given another chance, but everyone else goes.

Is this plausible?
If so, does it make enough difference to turn things around?
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,500,000
2$1,025,000
2$1,025,000
1$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,500,000
4$5,500,000
5$5,000,000
2$900,000
Trades
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2020
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2021
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$79,000,000$75,411,309$0$182,500$3,588,691
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LW
UFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
$4,900,000$4,900,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
$650,000$650,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C
UFA - 3
$1,166,667$1,166,667
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,025,000$1,025,000
LW
UFA - 1
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
$839,166$839,166
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$650,000$650,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 8
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 8
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD
UFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LD
UFA - 2
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$1,025,000$1,025,000
G
UFA - 3
$748,333$748,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jan. 6, 2018 at 8:11 a.m.
#1
Rational Fan(atic)
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 389
Likes: 70
I'm interested in hearing what Dallas fans think of this trade. Both are considered bad contracts but Alzner's is longer. Personally, as a Habs fan, I would do it, but I think there should be more coming from us honestly.
Jan. 6, 2018 at 9:49 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 430
Quoting: Campa96
I'm interested in hearing what Dallas fans think of this trade. Both are considered bad contracts but Alzner's is longer. Personally, as a Habs fan, I would do it, but I think there should be more coming from us honestly.


If there's more needed, it would be at the margins -- perhaps a 4th or 5th.

Good trade, I think. I like the signing of Stastny. Not enough of a De Haan fan to make that signing, but Jack Johnson, John Carlson and a few others would fit that hole nicely, though I'm seeing enough in Jerabek to wonder if he wouldn't make a good partner for Weber.

Stripping Max probably isn't really an option unless he asks for it to happen so that he can focus on his contract year. Which brings another question. Do you keep Max after next year or simply let him disappear? I also think Gallagher would lose some of his devil-may-care approach if he has to behave "like a captain."

Last point: wouldn't it be better to trade away Andrew Shaw if you're not going to use him?. I'd play him where you have Byron, but failing that, eating $1.5M and getting a good pick would be a better use than having nearly $4M parked on the 4th line.
ricochetii liked this.
Jan. 6, 2018 at 10:25 a.m.
#3
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,667
Likes: 4,091
Quoting: Campa96
I'm interested in hearing what Dallas fans think of this trade. Both are considered bad contracts but Alzner's is longer. Personally, as a Habs fan, I would do it, but I think there should be more coming from us honestly.


I'm interested as well.
Alzner performing better in Dallas would be the hope, and if not it would be easier to "pass the buck" when he has less term after spending 2 seasons in Dallas.
They are buying low, since it is only costing them a bad contract.

Quoting: Truebeliever
If there's more needed, it would be at the margins -- perhaps a 4th or 5th.

Good trade, I think. I like the signing of Stastny. Not enough of a De Haan fan to make that signing, but Jack Johnson, John Carlson and a few others would fit that hole nicely, though I'm seeing enough in Jerabek to wonder if he wouldn't make a good partner for Weber.

Stripping Max probably isn't really an option unless he asks for it to happen so that he can focus on his contract year. Which brings another question. Do you keep Max after next year or simply let him disappear? I also think Gallagher would lose some of his devil-may-care approach if he has to behave "like a captain."

Last point: wouldn't it be better to trade away Andrew Shaw if you're not going to use him?. I'd play him where you have Byron, but failing that, eating $1.5M and getting a good pick would be a better use than having nearly $4M parked on the 4th line.


De Haan might be a gamble, but he still has his prime and Weber as a partner should help as well.
Jerabek is another possibility, something we should get a better idea of once Weber returns this year.

Keeping Pacioretty is dependant on whether this all works. Taking the captaincy away maximizes the possibility of that happening. If it doesn't work, you want Pacioretty to be 100% focused on his performance and raising his trade value.
I like Gallagher for the C, but Weber is another option.

As for Shaw, this is intended to be simple and the beginning of the season. He'll play where he fits in best and he can move up the lineup if Hanzal or one of our wingers isn't cutting it.
Since he's cut out the shenanigans, he's been playing better hockey, so I'm okay with keeping him for now to give the younger guys time to stabilize. We have wingers to spare, so if a good deal comes along, we can consider moving him then.
There would be some shuffling to see who works best with the new acquisitions regardless.
See All