SalarySwishSalarySwish

Playoff Avs - Adding Yandle, Recall Zads & Rant

Created by: coga16
Team: 2015-16 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 21, 2016
Published: Jan. 27, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Yandle alwayas seemed like a good fit with the Avs, so a Team looks at being a buyer at the deadline to improve the team, could they land him with a deal similar to this.

The pick and decent prospect are pretty standard as part of a rental deadline deal, question is would Rangers want a cheap guy signed long term like Holden who is a pretty respectable but not glamorous 4-6 kind of guy.
Trades
NYR
  1. Holden, Nick
Additional Details:
2017 2nd round pick
(conditional 1st if resigns)
RFA rights to Connor Bleackley
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$71,400,000$56,588,596$212,500$3,760,000$14,811,404
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 1
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
UFA - 6
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 5
$925,000$925,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
$2,400,000$2,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
$675,000$675,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$2,666,667$2,666,667
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C
UFA - 2
$675,000$675,000
RW
UFA - 1
$600,000$600,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,625,000$2,625,000
LD
UFA - 1
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
$5,900,000$5,900,000
G
UFA - 4
$843,333$843,333 (Performance Bonus$60,000$60K)
RD
UFA - 3
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RD
UFA - 1
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
$1,450,000$1,450,000
G
UFA - 2
$850,500$850,500
LD
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$900,000$900,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
$3,600,000$3,600,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$650,000$650,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jan. 28, 2016 at 1:59 a.m.
#1
NateB19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 106
Likes: 7
On behalf of the Rangers, I accept.
Jan. 28, 2016 at 1:17 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 388
Likes: 13
Wayyyyyyy too high a price on Yandle who would not and should not figure into the Avs future plans
Jan. 28, 2016 at 4:44 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: LobsterMagnet19
Wayyyyyyy too high a price on Yandle who would not and should not figure into the Avs future plans


normally I would agree, but that really is close to the price of the premier rentals at the deadline, teams always have to over pay. Hes not worth that but if Avs ponied up to pay rental prices, I wouldnt be shocked to see a similar deal by them or another team
Jan. 28, 2016 at 11:26 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 388
Likes: 13
My point is that the price is too high for the Avs. They are not in the market for a rental and with the cap situation they would certainly not be able to afford Yandle beyond the season, so that makes the price (for 20 games only) sort of ludicrous. It's not ludicrous if you are A) a team vying for a cup right now or B) a team that could/would realistically keep Yandle, but the Avs are neither.
Jan. 29, 2016 at 3:06 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: LobsterMagnet19
My point is that the price is too high for the Avs. They are not in the market for a rental and with the cap situation they would certainly not be able to afford Yandle beyond the season, so that makes the price (for 20 games only) sort of ludicrous. It's not ludicrous if you are A) a team vying for a cup right now or B) a team that could/would realistically keep Yandle, but the Avs are neither.


I can agree with that, its too high for the Avs to pay since they shouldnt be burning assets on rentals, just fun to see if they did go all in, Yandle could be a guy I could see them target since the past few seasons Yandle ROR swap has always been talked about.
See All