SalarySwishSalarySwish

Penguins TDL

Created by: PhilTheThrill
Team: 2017-18 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 16, 2018
Published: Feb. 17, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Hunwick I think would help LA a lot still, to improve their defense. Sheary and Gustavsson, especially with Ottawa's goalie situation and a second I think could get the job done considering I do not think there will be anyone who will bite on the actual price. The Grabner trade, looks lovely, but I doubt actually happens like that, but I know Rutherford will not trade his first rounder or Sprong so I did not know what else to put in there.
Trades
1.
LAK
  1. Hunwick, Matt
  2. 2018 5th round pick (PIT)
2.
OTT
  1. Gustavsson, Filip
  2. Sheary, Conor
  3. 2018 2nd round pick (PIT)
3.
NYR
  1. Miletic, Sam
  2. Prow, Ethan
  3. 2019 3rd round pick (PIT)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the DET
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
2019
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
2020
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$75,000,000$69,602,913$50,000$440,000$5,397,087
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$734,167$734,167 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$1,875,000$1,875,000
LW
UFA - 2
$9,500,000$9,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$1,650,000$1,650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$6,800,000$6,800,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
$640,000$640,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$2,075,000$2,075,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 6
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
$3,750,000$3,750,000
G
UFA - 3
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 5
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
$630,833$630,833 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
G
UFA - 1
$964,688$964,688
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Feb. 17, 2018 at 4:29 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 3,022
Likes: 351
Much more realistic than some of the other trades I've seen. I like these trades. Losing sheary would be tough but that works. Rangers want at least a second or higher or maybe a couple of high picks. But they would rather have an actual player that can help them in the playoffs. Who knows what they'll do with grabner.
PhilTheThrill liked this.
Feb. 17, 2018 at 8:16 a.m.
#2
Lafreniere
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 305
OTT needs a 1st and they are only losing 500k in salary.
Feb. 17, 2018 at 1:06 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 152
Likes: 13
Quoting: ShafferPens
OTT needs a 1st and they are only losing 500k in salary.


Their ask is close to what Kessels ask was, and I doubt that happens at all. If they were smart they’d take that deal.
Feb. 17, 2018 at 1:35 p.m.
#4
Lafreniere
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 305
Quoting: PhilTheThrill
Their ask is close to what Kessels ask was, and I doubt that happens at all. If they were smart they’d take that deal.

They don’t need to trade Brassard.

1) They are only saving 500k salary

Brassard makes 3.5m salary and Sheary makes 3.0m salary. Ottawa is trying to cut salary and they could cut more off by not taking a roster player back. That causes the salary cap issue for the Penguins.

2) They don’t get a “top” prospect

Honestly, this depends on Ottawa’s preference. I could see Ottawa wanting Sprong over Gustavsson or vice versa.

I wouldn’t ever consider a goalie prospect a “top” prospect, because they are hard to rate. A “top” goalie prospect? Sure you can call him that.

3) The arguably most important part for Ottawa: Getting a first

Ottawa already traded their first for Duchene , so there’s a good chance they won’t have a first in 2019. Ottawa is rebuilding, no question, so they would want a first is a deep draft(both 2018 and 2019 are deep drafts, fyi).
See All