Quoting: StuTheSniper
You have to remember Pacioretty is only signed for one more year. Draisaitl is signed until 2025, Klefbom until 2023... They also are left with Nurse, Larsson, Benning. There's their future d-core.
We have Weber, Petry, Juulsen... Why do we need a RD? We have Danault, Hudon, Poehling's coming, maybe even Drouin in that spot if Draisaitl was the 1C... Why do we need a 2C? We have a Talbot-Lindgren tandem. This is Talbot's first rough season, but look how the team in front of him is playing. He's a more than adequate starter and you have Lindgren being groomed into the starter role... Why do we need a G?
This just sets up MTL much better than EDM going forward, so it's an easy no for them.
top 4 RD because outside of webber we have nothing, I know petery is a good puck moving d man but he is a liability in the d zone and is slowwwww. Juulsen is not top 4 and needs development. That can be fixed with Boqvist being drafted.
2c need because Druoin (shown he is not a center) hudon (really?), daneault (maybe 2c at best but a better 3c). They just signed Kleffbloom and Draisitl they will not trade them.
Pleck to Pits i will assume didn't happen and he could play 2c for this year and re-sign for 2-2.5m and play 4c next year (and the return is terrible)
We currently (this year) get scored on less than edmonton and they most certainly have a better d core than we do. This is taking into account the last couple of blow outs we have suffered as well.
Would you rather have talbot or price?
Do you think the impact Draisitl would make would make up for the difference Price makes?
Do you think Draisitl will produce more than patch?
With this option
MTL gets worse at G and back up stays the same, and wing (decent depth to deal and better at center and does not get the puck moving d man they need they get a shut down d man albeit it does make the d better
EDM gets worse at D (but they have good depth to deal with that) and Center (but they have good depth to deal with that) Then they get better at G and Wing.