SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sedins to SJ for the playoff push.

Created by: CheechYou
Team: 2017-18 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 21, 2018
Published: Feb. 21, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
A run for the cup before they resign back in Vancouver in the offseason.
Trades
SJS
  1. Sedin, Daniel ($3,500,000 retained)
  2. Sedin, Henrik ($3,500,000 retained)
VAN
  1. 2019 2nd round pick (SJS)
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (SJS)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2019
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2020
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$75,000,000$70,447,167$235,500$932,500$4,552,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 1
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$717,500$717,500 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$735,000$735,000
C
UFA - 1
$1,900,000$1,900,000
RW
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
$3,275,000$3,275,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 1
$3,800,000$3,800,000
RD
UFA - 3
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
LD
UFA - 2
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 8
$625,000$625,000
G
UFA - 1
$1,635,000$1,635,000
LD
UFA - 3
$650,000$650,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 21, 2018 at 8:49 p.m.
#1
Go Canucks Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 135
Likes: 28
Canucks might do it for 0 retained but for half retained. we will need a 1st
Feb. 23, 2018 at 12:38 p.m.
#2
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 927
Terrible trade for both sides. Canucks would probably want more and the Sharks don't need to lose more picks.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll