SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ducks 2018-19

Created by: Mardzy
Team: 2018-19 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: May 18, 2018
Published: May 18, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Ducks need to hope Perry can have a bounce back season and the kids can produce.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$940,000
2$940,000
2$940,000
2$940,000
2$940,000
2$2,500,000
2$3,750,000
2$1,650,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$1,500,000
2$1,850,000
1$650,000
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2020
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$78,000,000$68,498,417$0$850,000$9,501,583
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 3
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
$8,625,000$8,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 2
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 4
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW
UFA - 3
$1,650,000$1,650,000
LW
UFA - 3
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$650,000$650,000
C
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 8
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
UFA - 4
$2,300,000$2,300,000
G
UFA - 1
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 4
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$794,167$794,167
LD
UFA - 1
$1,850,000$1,850,000
LD
UFA - 2
$900,000$900,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 18, 2018 at 5:49 p.m.
#1
Log off the internet
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 7,838
Likes: 3,867
This Kevin Boyle guy must be pretty good
Mardzy liked this.
May 18, 2018 at 6:55 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 229
Why would you sign Sbisa to such an awful contract. Gross. cry
May 21, 2018 at 11:53 a.m.
#3
Go Ducks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 107
Likes: 3
Pretty good team, but two concerns:
1. Since Kase and Monty had breakout seasons this year, it would be better to pay a little more for long term deals since they haven't shown consistent play. If they continue this play for the two years on your contracts, they'll require a much higher salary than they would get now.

2. I'd shuffle the lines a bit. If you wanna help Steel and Terry develop, they should be put on scoring lines with good players to ease them in. A 4th line role isn't their style of play. Also, for the young prospects, it would be better to give them playing time in the minors than have them scratched as backups.
Mardzy liked this.
May 21, 2018 at 11:59 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 403
Likes: 40
Quoting: SirQuacksALot
Pretty good team, but two concerns:
1. Since Kase and Monty had breakout seasons this year, it would be better to pay a little more for long term deals since they haven't shown consistent play. If they continue this play for the two years on your contracts, they'll require a much higher salary than they would get now.

2. I'd shuffle the lines a bit. If you wanna help Steel and Terry develop, they should be put on scoring lines with good players to ease them in. A 4th line role isn't their style of play. Also, for the young prospects, it would be better to give them playing time in the minors than have them scratched as backups.


I see your point, but do you want to give out multi-year deals to players with one year of relative success? How many years would you give each? To me I think bridge contracts should be given before consistent success has been shown. The reason I kept the prospects up is because there are going to be injuries, and I figure these guys will probably spend most of the year with the Ducks, but yes, makes no sense to sit in the pressbox, but couldn't they also be lost on waivers if they're sent down?
May 21, 2018 at 12:12 p.m.
#5
Go Ducks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 107
Likes: 3
I can see multi year deals being a risk if it's a player in his late 20s or 30s who had a breakout year after being inconsistent for a few years prior, but with young players like Monty and Kase, it's very likely that they will continue to improve (or at least remain stagnant), so it's not too big of a gamble.

As far as waivers go, players on entry level contracts can be sent up and down without having to clear waivers for a year or two (I'm not exactly sure how the duration is determined. It might be a number of NHL games played and could vary from player to player, but waiver exemption definitely is a thing.). This allows teams to test out rookies without worrying about losing them.
May 21, 2018 at 12:22 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 403
Likes: 40
Quoting: SirQuacksALot
I can see multi year deals being a risk if it's a player in his late 20s or 30s who had a breakout year after being inconsistent for a few years prior, but with young players like Monty and Kase, it's very likely that they will continue to improve (or at least remain stagnant), so it's not too big of a gamble.

As far as waivers go, players on entry level contracts can be sent up and down without having to clear waivers for a year or two (I'm not exactly sure how the duration is determined. It might be a number of NHL games played and could vary from player to player, but waiver exemption definitely is a thing.). This allows teams to test out rookies without worrying about losing them.


I understand how waivers work, Roy and Kossila's entry level deals are up, not sure they'd pass through, probaby good enough to be picked up by someone.
May 21, 2018 at 5:27 p.m.
#7
Go Ducks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 107
Likes: 3
I thought you meant the new guys like Steel and Terry. Even still, most teams usually sign an extra expendable player to play as a backup, like what Derek Grant and Marcus Petterson were supposed to be last year. This way they have a backup without risking waivers. There are also emergency loans which can be used in the case of an injury, which exempt the player from waivers as long as they are returned as soon as the injured player is healthy. Roy and Kossila can be used as replacements, but will still get playing time in the AHL.
May 21, 2018 at 6:33 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 403
Likes: 40
Quoting: SirQuacksALot
I thought you meant the new guys like Steel and Terry. Even still, most teams usually sign an extra expendable player to play as a backup, like what Derek Grant and Marcus Petterson were supposed to be last year. This way they have a backup without risking waivers. There are also emergency loans which can be used in the case of an injury, which exempt the player from waivers as long as they are returned as soon as the injured player is healthy. Roy and Kossila can be used as replacements, but will still get playing time in the AHL.


I understand the 13f/7d role. Didn't realize Roy and Kossila signed entry level deals at 23 and still had a year of waiver exemption.
SirQuacksALot liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll