SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Two Trades - Rasmus and a 1st

Created by: Kuch813
Team: 2018-19 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: May 30, 2018
Published: May 30, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Just dreaming about the JT signing, but are the CGY and COL trades fair? Seriously though, maybe moving Stamkos to LW could revitalize him and get him back to sniping? Maybe that kind of line setup would eliminate some of the over-passing and get Kucherov to shoot more as well? $11.4M coming off the cap after 18-19 between Coburn, Girardi, and McDonagh (no, I do not think he will be re-signed). A Callahan buyout after the 18-19 season would also save $3.133M for 19-20 and then be $1.567M in dead space the following year. That's $14.533M to help cover the extensions for Kucherov, Point, Gourde, and Bennett. Can probably do an extension for Stralman at a slight paycut for insurance as well. And then the next off-season, Killorn will probably have to be moved before the new contracts for Vasilevskiy, Sergachev, and Cirelli; but $1.833M from Carle's buyout will also come off that off-season.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$875,000
1$875,000
1$1,000,000
1$925,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$9,500,000
1$650,000
Trades
1.
TBL
  1. Andersson, Rasmus
  2. Bennett, Sam
  3. 2018 7th round pick (CGY)
CGY
  1. Dotchin, Jake
  2. Johnson, Tyler
  3. 2018 4th round pick (TBL)
2.
TBL
  1. 2018 1st round pick (COL)
COL
  1. 2018 7th round pick (TBL)
Additional Details:
RFA J.T. Miller
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the COL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the CGY
2019
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
2020
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$80,000,000$78,557,946$142,947$1,297,500$1,442,054
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 6
$9,500,000$9,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 7
$4,766,667$4,766,667
RW
UFA - 1
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 4
$686,667$686,667 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,950,000$1,950,000
C
UFA - 1
$728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
C, LW
UFA - 2
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 5
$875,000$875,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
$650,000$650,000
LW
UFA - 1
$875,000$875,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
$4,700,000$4,700,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 2
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$755,833$755,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RD
UFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 30, 2018 at 1:49 p.m.
#1
Beanmachine
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 500
From a Flames perspective I would do that trade - Fair both ways
Kuch813 liked this.
May 30, 2018 at 2:24 p.m.
#2
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,568
Likes: 9,189
Florida has less income tax than most states (and providences) with teams in the league and are way better equipped to win now, if he’d take a pay cut to go anywhere it would be there. Give him 10 mill though. If JT Miller isn’t enough for a first I doubt that 7th rounder helps any.
May 30, 2018 at 2:29 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 230
Likes: 27
Edited May 30, 2018 at 2:38 p.m.
From the Flames perspective, I would say Johnson "better" than Bennet, and Anderson "much better" than Dotchin, so with the pick upgrade the trade proposal is in the ballpark. Even so, I am not sure I would do the trade even though it addresses the Flames' need for a right shot forward. Bennet's style likely to be a much better fit with the new coach (and playoffs), and both he and Anderson still have significant potential to grow to their ceilings, so Tampa gets all the upside, with little upside potential for Calgary. To me, all things considered Bennett and Johnson are a saw-off, and losing Anderson is a big loss for Calgary. The pick upgrade is marginal in reality, considering the likelihood that either end up NHLers 2-3 years down the road.

If you substituted someone like Taylor Raddysh (young RW that Calgary needs) instead of Dotchin, and dropped the pick exchange, then there would be something to seriously talk about.
May 30, 2018 at 3:34 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 153
Likes: 6
Quoting: Shibbal18
Florida has less income tax than most states (and providences) with teams in the league and are way better equipped to win now, if he’d take a pay cut to go anywhere it would be there. Give him 10 mill though. If JT Miller isn’t enough for a first I doubt that 7th rounder helps any.

Yeah it would probably have to be slightly more, but I don’t see Yzerman going that high. The COL trade thinking was just so they keep something for a pick, even if it is a late rounder. I think Miller can/will fetch a mid-late first rounder, as I do not see him fitting into the cap plans.
May 30, 2018 at 3:36 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 153
Likes: 6
Quoting: cberg
From the Flames perspective, I would say Johnson "better" than Bennet, and Anderson "much better" than Dotchin, so with the pick upgrade the trade proposal is in the ballpark. Even so, I am not sure I would do the trade even though it addresses the Flames' need for a right shot forward. Bennet's style likely to be a much better fit with the new coach (and playoffs), and both he and Anderson still have significant potential to grow to their ceilings, so Tampa gets all the upside, with little upside potential for Calgary. To me, all things considered Bennett and Johnson are a saw-off, and losing Anderson is a big loss for Calgary. The pick upgrade is marginal in reality, considering the likelihood that either end up NHLers 2-3 years down the road.

If you substituted someone like Taylor Raddysh (young RW that Calgary needs) instead of Dotchin, and dropped the pick exchange, then there would be something to seriously talk about.

I think that would be fair.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll