SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mock deadline 3

Created by: Clyde_Frog_FTW
Team: 2018-19 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: May 31, 2018
Published: May 31, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
trying to create a mock deadline scenario, tell me if you think trades are too one sided, but please do so with a suggestion.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$5,250,000
3$6,000,000
3$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$700,000
1$900,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
Trades
1.
MIN
  1. 2018 4th round pick (MIN)
  2. 2019 4th round pick (SJS)
  3. 2020 5th round pick (BUF)
2.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2019
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2020
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$80,000,000$73,592,758$25,000$1,507,500$6,407,242
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$5,750,000$5,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LW
NMC
UFA - 7
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
$916,666$916,666 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 2
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
$900,000$900,000
C
UFA
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
$5,187,500$5,187,500
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$2,166,667$2,166,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$4,166,667$4,166,667
LD
UFA - 3
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 5
$650,000$650,000
G
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
$650,000$650,000
RD
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 31, 2018 at 12:27 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 302
Likes: 52
Shaw and Schlemko? I get that we want to get rid of Ennis but he is only under contract for a couple more months in this deadline scenario. Coyle and Olof are certainly not negative assets so no reason to do this. Foligno deal is fine but Soucy and Kloos are worth more than that for sure.
May 31, 2018 at 12:56 p.m.
#2
Eichel Tower
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 4,716
Likes: 2,441
Foligno, M. + Soucy, C. + Kloos, J. to Buffalo for 2019 3rd (about the same as 3 fourths)
May 31, 2018 at 1:25 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Clyde Frog FTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 50
Likes: 7
Quoting: marmon725
Shaw and Schlemko? I get that we want to get rid of Ennis but he is only under contract for a couple more months in this deadline scenario. Coyle and Olof are certainly not negative assets so no reason to do this. Foligno deal is fine but Soucy and Kloos are worth more than that for sure.


Yeah it looks really bad, maybe I can make some adjustments, any thoughts?
May 31, 2018 at 1:34 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6
Likes: 2
I understand the desire to move the Ennis contract, but taking on Shaw's contract puts us in a much worse spot long term. it would be easier to try to move Ennis to a team with a lot of spare cap space that just need a roster spot filled. its only a one year deal so it won' hurt that team if they aren't trying to make any major moves at the deadline. Coyle obviously has struggled here but he's a player that could really excel with a change of scenery, kind of like Haula. So if you're going to move Coyle, i think it has to be for something more than making a team take Ennis, and then getting a tough Shaw contract in return.
May 31, 2018 at 1:43 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Clyde Frog FTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 50
Likes: 7
Quoting: marmon725
Shaw and Schlemko? I get that we want to get rid of Ennis but he is only under contract for a couple more months in this deadline scenario. Coyle and Olof are certainly not negative assets so no reason to do this. Foligno deal is fine but Soucy and Kloos are worth more than that for sure.


Check the changes now.
May 31, 2018 at 1:43 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Clyde Frog FTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 50
Likes: 7
Quoting: Gandalf_Noodles
I understand the desire to move the Ennis contract, but taking on Shaw's contract puts us in a much worse spot long term. it would be easier to try to move Ennis to a team with a lot of spare cap space that just need a roster spot filled. its only a one year deal so it won' hurt that team if they aren't trying to make any major moves at the deadline. Coyle obviously has struggled here but he's a player that could really excel with a change of scenery, kind of like Haula. So if you're going to move Coyle, i think it has to be for something more than making a team take Ennis, and then getting a tough Shaw contract in return.


Check the changes now.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll