Why? don't even think about it, we will use none of the 3 except Matthews but why would Boston. leading goal scorer. Even so, that is not even close to the value. You still need to add something like a first and a third or your backup and a 3rd. honestly, not even close in value if you are trying to make it fair. 3 mid round firsts will not get David Pastrnak.

Pastrnak's value is in the ballpark of Kucherov. Do you really think this deal would land Kucherov?

Also - as mentioned Boston's real problem is scoring (depth), so why would they trade their best scorer for a very good player who scores less. The Bruins have a ton of young not quite ready talent already.

they wouldnt trade him, read the description

No kidding. I did. I just don't get why you keep doing these.

Your Value is off. Way off. If you want to know the value of Pastrnak, you have to take into account what the Bruins would want in return based on team needs. Bruins need scoring. This doesn't improve their scoring, it diminishes it.

Ask yourself if you trade Pettersson for the deal you are offering - if the answer is no, the answer/value is no to pastrnak as well. Then realize Pettersson is 2.5 years younger than Pastrnak and Pastrnak has 101 more career goals than Pettersson.

Also assuming you are a Canucks fan, I don't know why you keep trying to find out what Calgary would have to give up to land him.

Your value gauge sucks.