SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Putting Mike Smith out of MY Misery

Created by: canadian1967
Team: 2018-19 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 16, 2018
Published: Nov. 16, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Smith has to go, and Either Mrazek orMcIlhinney can't be as bad, plus we get some more cap space to add a rental if needed.
Trades
CGY
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. 2019 6th round pick (CGY)
Additional Details:
Either Mrazek OR McIlhinney but I prefer Mrazek because he's only 26, plus we get our 6th rounder back.
CAR
  1. Frolík, Michael ($2,000,000 retained)
  2. Smith, Mike ($2,125,000 retained)
  3. 2019 4th round pick (NYI)
Additional Details:
Smith might be fine with a change of scenery, and Frolik will be another asset for them at the TDL
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
2019
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CAR
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$79,500,000$68,252,542$0$1,540,000$11,247,458
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,950,000$1,950,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$850,000$850,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,675,000$1,675,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$725,000$725,000
LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,650,400$4,650,400
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,857,143$3,857,143
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$755,833$755,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 16, 2018 at 3:02 p.m.
#1
Brendan Fox
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 511
Likes: 135
You tried to Cap Dump Smith as a rental and ended up retaining exactly what you needed to get rid of.. You retain 4 million to "save" space???? also Smith is (despite his early struggles) probably better than Mrazek, and you just traded Frolik for literally nothing. if you wanna trade Smith because he hasn't played well, at least get something in return.... Also, you need picks and decided to give them a 4th just to make it worse.

I really hope this was a joke or just a way to trash on Smith, because if you're even slightly serious this is sad...
Nov. 16, 2018 at 3:21 p.m.
#2
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: brenfox31
You tried to Cap Dump Smith as a rental and ended up retaining exactly what you needed to get rid of.. You retain 4 million to "save" space???? also Smith is (despite his early struggles) probably better than Mrazek, and you just traded Frolik for literally nothing. if you wanna trade Smith because he hasn't played well, at least get something in return.... Also, you need picks and decided to give them a 4th just to make it worse.

I really hope this was a joke or just a way to trash on Smith, because if you're even slightly serious this is sad...


Put smith on waivers... problem solved.. if he gets picked up great!!! If not he can let shitty goals in at ahl level.
brenfox31 liked this.
Nov. 16, 2018 at 3:41 p.m.
#3
Brendan Fox
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 511
Likes: 135
Quoting: Jamiepo
Put smith on waivers... problem solved.. if he gets picked up great!!! If not he can let shitty goals in at ahl level.


at least they don't trade a 4th rounder and a 3rd liner to get rid of him, lmao. Also should save more cap, and in all likeliness he gets claimed and someone else will get dropped as a result (IE Mrazek or Pickard or something like that), which CGY can grab
GenXHockey liked this.
Nov. 16, 2018 at 3:50 p.m.
#4
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: brenfox31
at least they don't trade a 4th rounder and a 3rd liner to get rid of him, lmao. Also should save more cap, and in all likeliness he gets claimed and someone else will get dropped as a result (IE Mrazek or Pickard or something like that), which CGY can grab


My thinking exactly. Just something temporary. If Calgary can hold on (and I think they can due to the dumpster fire division that is the pacific) till near the TDL they may be able to make a move on a goalie like holtby. Flames have a solid team, just no goaltending.
brenfox31 liked this.
Nov. 16, 2018 at 4:47 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Canadian1967
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 84
Likes: 8
Quoting: brenfox31
You tried to Cap Dump Smith as a rental and ended up retaining exactly what you needed to get rid of.. You retain 4 million to "save" space???? also Smith is (despite his early struggles) probably better than Mrazek, and you just traded Frolik for literally nothing. if you wanna trade Smith because he hasn't played well, at least get something in return.... Also, you need picks and decided to give them a 4th just to make it worse.

I really hope this was a joke or just a way to trash on Smith, because if you're even slightly serious this is sad...


Yes, IT IS SAD that it has come to the point where Smith needs to be wiped from the Whole Organization. It is an indictment on Mike Smith.

I'm NOT dumping Smith for Cap reasons. I'm getting him the Hell out of my dressing room, and nobody is taking our problem, so I need to give something to get something.
So I'm trading Frolik and swapping a 4th for a 6th in order to remove the stench and bad attitude of Smith from my whole Organization.
I wouldn't waive him because nobody will take him and then he will pout even more than he already is, and I can't send him to Stockton, because I don't want him exposed to my up and comers.

It's a shame that it has come to this, but maybe Mrazek will be happy to buddy up with Rittich, or if not then bringing in McBackup to partner with Rittich won't be any worse than Smith ON-ICE.

So, no, there's not $4M of cap space gained, but the way it's structured we would gain about $1.4M, LEAVING us with $4M of space after the trade to do something else.

AGAIN, NOBODY WILL CLAIM SMITH ON WAIVERS, AND I DON'T WANT HIM POISONING MY GUYS IN THE MINORS, SO I HAVE TO GIVE SOMETHING TO GET SOMETHING AND THE SOMETHING I'M GETTING IS RID OF SMITH.
Nov. 16, 2018 at 4:50 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Canadian1967
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 84
Likes: 8
Quoting: Jamiepo
Put smith on waivers... problem solved.. if he gets picked up great!!! If not he can let shitty goals in at ahl level.


Nobody will claim him, and I ain't letting him anywhere near my young goalies in Stockton after waiving him. No way. He already has a bad attitude.
Nov. 16, 2018 at 4:51 p.m.
#7
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: canadian1967
Nobody will claim him, and I ain't letting him anywhere near my young goalies in Stockton after waiving him. No way. He already has a bad attitude.


Bad attitude?? He seemed pretty somber after last game.
Nov. 16, 2018 at 4:59 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Canadian1967
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 84
Likes: 8
Quoting: Jamiepo
Bad attitude?? He seemed pretty somber after last game.


That was the first time he hasn't thrown his D in front of the Bus. Good on him for that, but he has not been a happy camper this year.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll