SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL buy

Created by: Hakkis10
Team: 2018-19 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 4, 2018
Published: Dec. 4, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
MIN
  1. Johansson, Marcus ($2,200,000 retained)
NJD
  1. 2019 2nd round pick (MIN)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
2019
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2020
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2021
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$79,500,000$74,471,092$25,000$425,000$5,028,908
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,750,000$5,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$550,000$550,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$687,500$687,500
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,875,000$2,875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,166,667$2,166,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,166,667$4,166,667
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,187,500$5,187,500
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$650,000$650,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$650,000$650,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 4, 2018 at 6:39 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
I'd rather we keep the pick. The Wild have proven they aren't making a deep run with this roster for 6 years in a row and adding a 3rd liner isn't going to magically change that.
Dec. 5, 2018 at 2:12 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 210
Likes: 9
Quoting: arousedcat
I'd rather we keep the pick. The Wild have proven they aren't making a deep run with this roster for 6 years in a row and adding a 3rd liner isn't going to magically change that.


I think this is the last chance to win. Next year rebuild is only thing that makes sense
Dec. 5, 2018 at 11:46 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: Hakkis10
I think this is the last chance to win. Next year rebuild is only thing that makes sense


The problem is that this team doesn't have a chance to win, not even this year. They can make the playoffs but can't go anywhere once they do which has been proven for 6 years. If we rebuild next year why would we trade away a 2nd, which would help with that? Greenway and Zucker were both 2nd round picks and Zucker has shown he's a 30+ goal scorer and Greenway probably has a 25g/60p ceiling. So we're trading away a potential player with that ceiling for less than a year of a guy who has consistently between 40-50 points? No thanks from me. Like I said, I'd rather just keep the pick. Adding rentals for high picks has never worked out for us, see the Hanzal trade. If we're in the playoffs at the deadline, great, but I wouldn't give up any picks for rentals.
Dec. 7, 2018 at 7:48 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 210
Likes: 9
Quoting: arousedcat
The problem is that this team doesn't have a chance to win, not even this year. They can make the playoffs but can't go anywhere once they do which has been proven for 6 years. If we rebuild next year why would we trade away a 2nd, which would help with that? Greenway and Zucker were both 2nd round picks and Zucker has shown he's a 30+ goal scorer and Greenway probably has a 25g/60p ceiling. So we're trading away a potential player with that ceiling for less than a year of a guy who has consistently between 40-50 points? No thanks from me. Like I said, I'd rather just keep the pick. Adding rentals for high picks has never worked out for us, see the Hanzal trade. If we're in the playoffs at the deadline, great, but I wouldn't give up any picks for rentals.


you get picks back when Granlund, Spurgeon and Coyle are traded next season
Dec. 7, 2018 at 12:29 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: Hakkis10
you get picks back when Granlund, Spurgeon and Coyle are traded next season


Trading Granlund is a pretty bad idea, but if the return is large enough I think any GM would be foolish to not consider it. I think Spurgeon and Coyle are both likely gone within the next year or two. This year's draft is loaded with talent so that's why I'm not too keen on giving up picks this year, especially since the Wild have traded away 3 1sts (if you count Tuch) and 4 2nds in the past 6 drafts.
Dec. 7, 2018 at 12:54 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,223
Likes: 3,642
Quoting: arousedcat
Trading Granlund is a pretty bad idea, but if the return is large enough I think any GM would be foolish to not consider it. I think Spurgeon and Coyle are both likely gone within the next year or two. This year's draft is loaded with talent so that's why I'm not too keen on giving up picks this year, especially since the Wild have traded away 3 1sts (if you count Tuch) and 4 2nds in the past 6 drafts.


I don't mind trading a 2nd, depending on where they are at in the standings. If it's going to be a late 2nd rounder then I don't care, if it's an early 2nd rounder then I want to keep it.

Trading Granny should be on the table. He's not the guy you build a team around, he's a complimentary player. The Wild just don't have the goal scorers to get the most out of him. He's going to get a big contract for his play from his prime, but will be leaving his prime soon after the contract is signed. I'm not saying take a bucket of pucks for him or anything, he'll fetch a quality return. The same thing goes for Spurgeon.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll