Quoting: LoganOllivier
I am not actually as high on Kapanen as other Leaf fans but he did just come off scoring 20 goals and 44 points in his first full season. I'd say the comparison to Cogliano is a bit of a stretch and you can never compare a 22 year old to a 31 year old when determining value. That is all just silly.
Gudas is not a top 4 minute eating defenceman. He's a bottom pair guy who in a pinch won't cost you a great deal of trouble playing on the 2nd pair. That makes him at best a bottom 4 defenceman. You don't trade a former 1st round pick, who scored 20 goals in his rookie season, for a bottom 4 defenceman who is turning 29 and takes a tonne of penalties. That just doesn't make any sense. Gudas would cost the Leafs more than he'd help them.
I did say my comparison was wrong. My point was that you can say something in a certain way and make it look accurate even if it isn’t. Sort of like your Polak comparison before. But I just can’t fathom why you think Gudas is a 3rd pair guy when literally every metric says he isn’t. If you’re saying that he can play on a third pair, then sure, cause depending on the team and defensive pairings, choosing the right combo, stuff like that, he can end up on a third pairing. But on any given team, at worst he’s a number 5 and that’s only on the teams who have great defenses. On most teams, he’s a 3 or a 4. On some teams he’s as high as a 2. That doesn’t sound like third pairing to me
Like literally any way you want to swing it, the conclusion ends up being, Radko Gudas is a second pair quality d-man. Scores points at the rate of a number 4 d-man. Creates shots at the rate of a number 3 d-man. Corsi for percentage, number 4 d-man. High danger chance percentage, number 2 d-man. Expected goals percentage, number 3 d-man. Shot surpression, number 4 d-man. Overall advanced stats, a 2/3 d-man. Want to look at more traditional stats? Hits, top of the league. Blocks, 1st pair d-man. Plus/Minus, number 3 d-man. All this while playing on a bad team and facing 2nd tier comp and being saddled with one of the worst defensemen in the NHL for 40% of the year until we finally called some guys up and started using Hagg like he should be used. How does any of this scream 3rd pair d-man who might be able to play on the 2nd pair? It’s like saying Matthews is a 2C who might be able to be a 1C
If Gudas is on Toronto, for starters, he would probably be your 3rd best d-man. His point totals would probably jump from 20 to like 25-30 and you’d be describing him as a shut down, second pair d-man who can move the puck, which is accurate
Penalties is something that I haven’t seen somebody really complain about but there are some pretty good names who take lots of penalties. Hell the guy leading in minors taken is a Norris Nominee. Jake Muzzin has 3 less minors than Gudas. I doubt you think Muzzin does more harm than good. Gudas’ penalties would be even lower if you remove the coincidental penalties that don’t even result in having to go on the PK
And I still don’t know why you keep bringing up the trade when whatever you say doesn’t change anything. I’ve said it so many times, I’m okay with the fact that you don’t like the trade. Ever since my first reply to you I haven’t been arguing the value of the trade. All I’ve been arguing is that Gudas is a 2nd pair d-man. You commenting on the trade won’t change that argument